AP-GfK Poll: 87% in US disapprove of Congress

you assume (naively) that politicians, when elected, are pursuing idealistic practices and projects.

THEY ARE NOT

Every governmental official is serving the incentivized interests of corporations.

the problem with Mega's perspective is that he actually believes democrats are righteously superior to republicans in some manner. that is an easy thing to do when you completely ignore any corrupt practice of a democrat leader.
 
you assume (naively) that politicians, when elected, are pursuing idealistic practices and projects.

THEY ARE NOT
Some are some aren't. I believe corruption happens to most people...they don't bring it with them.
Every governmental official is serving the incentivized interests of corporations.
Every one of them?:confused: Wow...we are really fucked then.:crying:
the problem with Mega's perspective is that he actually believes democrats are righteously superior to republicans in some manner. that is an easy thing to do when you completely ignore any corrupt practice of a democrat leader.

No. I don't. I have said on multiple occasions that GOPers are just far worse I know that seems like a distinction without a difference (better versus worse) but it is a difference IMO.

The Iraq war, tax cuts disingenuously perpetuated in spite of the country's needs, the debt limit issue brought to crisis point just to name a few.

If that isn't a convincing argument for these beings being worse then I don't know what is.

The biggest problem is their efficiency in producing and promulgating bad policy.

It's like comparing one disease that has the ability to kill you over the course of year to one that has the ability to kill you over the course of days. Or an easier example, GOPers are people who can't be reasoned with versus Demos who can be. This has been demonstrated over and over again. Probably not a redeeming quality in all cases as they bend over backwards at times.

Which is worse?
 

bahodeme

Closed Account
There are people with valid ideas on improving the economy. They are not people that the voters would put in to Congress or The Oval Office because they are not "likeable". If you get a chance to watch Bloomberg look at those that discuss the economy. Imagine them stating that they are planning to run for office. Special intersts groups & corporations wouldn't support them because they lose money/influence. The voters would revert back to high school, and think why would I vote for this geek? Plus most of us have some skeleton in the closet. Would you want the world to find out? So we are now voting for not the best person for the job, but the lesser of 2 or 3 evils.
 
Last edited:
What does Obama's second term have to do with Congress have a 87% disapprovial rating?

I could be wrong but I think tri was just venting (frustration) over the more is tried the more backfires.
 
1311823248731.png
 
C

cindy CD/TV

Guest
Whoa, so your saying that 13% of people actually approve of congress? That's more than I thought. :1orglaugh;)

Hey, you stole my line! :1orglaugh :goodpost:


Yo, what's up Mega!!!!!! *big hug* :) :glugglug:
 
Atar you know.....just use common sense, everyday logic that you applies in most cases to a personal budget.

We have record of whether tax cuts 'work' in creating jobs. There is no evidence; clear, anecdotal or even in understanding business principles which supports the notion that tax cuts to employers encourage job creation.

Again, companies exist to be profitable not hire people. Understanding this, how would a tax cut for a business meeting demand encourage them to add an employee at the expense of using the additional money to pad their profits?

That doesn't need right, left or indifferent spin to understand. That's just a common sense question of the policy when a person understands the business realities.

Is debt negative? Just like in your personal finances the answer is, it depends.

Going into debt for extravagances then using more debt to pay off that debt is bad debt...no doubt about it.

However, catching a good deal on an investment and assuming the risk by going into debt to take advantage of it (because in the end it will benefit you more) is good debt. I don't think a person with a $80K income buying a $400K home for $320 is going to turn around then start complaining about his $320K debt against his $80 annual income.:dunno:

Allot of these examples are analogous to our personal finances sometimes. A deficit is a deficit no matter if it's the g'ment talking billions or trillions...or you talking tens or hundreds of dollars.

I agree; but everything you just said....I feel no one could ever get elected on.

You have to appeal to a definitive answer. You can't verbally /shrug and say idk let's find out together. You also can't say hey debt is good and bad and it changes to fit the situation and what your debt is on not just how much. After all debt is just another way of saying Promise. It's a promise to pay; paying a promise with a promise is still just that.

People will say okay what's our debt? good or bad?

and then the honest person will say....... Both.....

People will say okay fuck off give me someone who can clearly tell me wtf is going on. Then enter guy Smiliy who tells them what they want to hear.

Some argue we should go back to gold standard; others say to issue our own money again.

“If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good, makes the bill good also…

Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurers and the other helps the people. If the currency issued by the Government was no good, then the bonds would be no good either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to increase the national wealth, must go into debt and submit to ruinous interest charges…” -Thomas Edison
 
Top