Anti-Israel Presidency?

[jasonk282]

Give England back to the Celts!

Boudica! Boudica! Boudica!

Were the Celts not Irish?

 

[Baill Inneraora]

Yes and no. Ireland was inhabited by Celts and so was Scotland, Wales, England and much of France. The Romans took over England and pushed the Celtic tribes out.

 

[tartanterrier]

I can see trouble for Obama in the future coming from a Jew.I mean
the Jews practically run the US anyway,so if he breaks the relationship
with Israel then he'll be in real deep shit.

I think when Obama and Brownose are pushing for the Iranians to stop
being secretive.That answers that question

 

[DreamSparrow]

What is superficial is that the Palestinians have voted for a corrupted terrorist based government that is composed of Radical and Antisemitic pieces of shit who are in thirst for blood of killed Israeli civilians. Palestinians backed up Arafat, now they back up Hamas and you still think an issue is possible. Barack Obama makes pressure on the Israelis in ordure to achieve what Clinton didn't.

If Israel seemed genuine in wanting peace and demonstrated this by freezing settlement expansion, then I'd say you'd have some kind of a point. But considering that Israel is clearly grab yet more land it doesn't own, and these "bloodthirsty radicals" are struggling to hold on to the tiny scrap they've been left with, I just can't agree.

I do not support Palestinian terrorism against Israel. I have extended family working and studying in Israel. However, I also reserve the same judgement for Israel in its treatment of the Palestinians - I do not support Israeli terrorism against Palestine. Judging by your whole-hearted support of the Butcher of Beirut, you don't seem to agree.

This also means that I see this conflict in terms of two sides who have clearly done terrible things to one another. That seems incontrovertible to me. But since one side was aggressed upon first by having their land stolen from them, and that theft continues today... the Palestinian argument makes more sense to me.

Put it this way... if someone invaded Britain, shuffled the the British people into a measly scrap of Norfolk, reduced what towns that remained to rubble, and then continued to humiliate us by consuming what we had left bit by bit every day, would I oppose them? Yes, I certainly would.

The Palestinians never existed as a real populace but are mostly migrants from the various Arab countries surrounding Israel.

The keys to the homes that Palestinians were forcefully removed from refutes this lie. The censuses carried out by the British Mandate of Palestine refute this lie. Genetics refutes this lie.

There may never have been a Palestinian state, per se, any more than there may never have been a Kurdistan, but they've always been in the region - even back when they were still called Jews and Christians.

Give England back to the Celts!

Boudica! Boudica! Boudica!

Yep, exactly. That's what Zionism boils down to - it's like the Irish and Scots demanding England back. Except it's even more ridiculous than that... As I pointed out earlier, DNA analysis shows that the average Palestinian is descended from the same ancient stock as the average Israeli... the difference is that Israelis are a combination of other groups too. So if anything, it would be more like an Irish or Scottish person demanding England back for the Celts... only to discover the English are probably more Celtic than they are...

I don't even agree with the nativist principle, but since Zionism is built on it, it needs to be addressed.

 

[Boothbabe]

There's no point in trying to reason with georges. He sees everything in black and white and thinks (deadly) force is the answer to everything and only wars can achieve peace. In his mind every muslim is a terrorist and the only good Arab is a dead Arab. You'd have better luck teaching math to a rock.

 

[titsrock]

Did you know that the best way to analyze a Georges post is in bed...with some cigs and wine...and a little *jazz* on in the background...then we read a Georges post, laugh, and then let amours take us wherever...

 

[georges]

There's no point in trying to reason with georges. He sees everything in black and white and thinks (deadly) force is the answer to everything and only wars can achieve peace. In his mind every muslim is a terrorist and the only good Arab is a dead Arab. You'd have better luck teaching math to a rock.

Hhahahahha:1orglaugh That is the silliest and the dumbest post I have ever read . I don't see everything in black and white unlike you who see everything in fluorescent pink glasses.:yesyes: I am always pragmatic and realistic something you are not Boothbabe, when I have to deal with any situation. Sadly with leaders like Ahmadinejhad, Khadafi, Bachar El Assad and Habbas, you need an iron fist in a canvas glove and never yield to these leaders's demands.
I don't put every muslim in the same basket because christians have also some fundamentalits like the westboro baptist church which isn't a reference either, so before saying what is in my mind boothbabe when you don't know me personally , get you facts straight otherwise shut up. I trust this is very clear, I am not going to tolerate that kind of bullshit quick made statements :nono:
Country with leaders who are ani western civilization, anti semitic, radical religious zealots and fundamentalists can only be dealt with force.
Your logic is like a thin a piece of paper, once you tear up that piece there is nothing left. You have been proved wrong in several threads, yet you still continue to act as if you were better and clever than others when you are just a basic simpleton who is very far to have a good sense of analysis and realism of the situation.

 

[pussy+dickdenice]

Don't get personal please. Keep on to the topic.​