I'm not Mega, and I didn't rep you. I guess this is a good example of what's wrong with your cult. You make bullshit claims about things that are easily provable and then ignore all the evidence. I can bring up a list of everybody I have repped and you're definitely not on it. You should go and have a lie down.
Another Obamacare Horror Story Debunked
- Thread starter Straight Shooter
- Start date
I'm not Mega, and I didn't rep you. I guess this is a good example of what's wrong with your cult. You make bullshit claims about things that are easily provable and then ignore all the evidence. I can bring up a list of everybody I have repped and you're definitely not on it. You should go and have a lie down.
Oh you're Mega alright. Just trying to pass yourself as an Aussie this time people are still chvckling about "photos" that you sent to a few OCSM's that caused you to leave the board in the first place.
HehehehehehehehehehahaHyena
Closed Account
How can you have catastrophic coverage when you're always telling us how rich and successfull you are?
- - - Updated - - -
How can you have catastrophic coverage when you're always telling us how rich and successfull you are?
He's tried this one on me too. Just ignore him.
When you've got it, flaunt it. I have stacks of 100 dollar bills laying around the house with some physician's name it. It makes for an interesting 18 holes of golf on Wednesdays. Especially when they get into a bidding war to wax my cart.
My friend, it's time to stop posting for the day.
:2 cents:
:2 cents:
Can I quote you in a year or two?
Waa! Waa! Waa! That is what I hear on this topic.
Romeycare has been in effect for a few years now. When they started up it was a disaster. They got over the shakeout issues.
Massachusetts now has the highest healthcare enrollment, over 98% I believe.
If the Republicans picked the guy who architected the healthcare reform to begin with, I'm not sure whey they didn't sell him as the guy who could roll it out effectively. They could have said the other guy has no experience, why should we deal with his learning curve. ...but they didn't.
From what I read, Romneycare is a burden on the middle class. Unlike the Youtube video floating around implying that the wealthiest will fund the have-nots, Romneycare is paid for by the middle class. That is today, we will see how it works out in the long run. However, I suspect that will be the case at the end of the day. The CBO says there is a $100B plus savings over a decade. Ok. Call me a doubter. I think it will be a net increase and it will be the middle class that pays. Just my guess. No better than my Super Bowl prediction.
Now, if the goal is to increase the overall number of people covered by healthcare. That is what I will think will happen. Will the quality of healthcare go up? I suspect for those not previously covered before, but that is probably it.
Lots of crying on this, but I think as usual mostly focused on the wrong areas.
Romeycare has been in effect for a few years now. When they started up it was a disaster. They got over the shakeout issues.
Massachusetts now has the highest healthcare enrollment, over 98% I believe.
If the Republicans picked the guy who architected the healthcare reform to begin with, I'm not sure whey they didn't sell him as the guy who could roll it out effectively. They could have said the other guy has no experience, why should we deal with his learning curve. ...but they didn't.
From what I read, Romneycare is a burden on the middle class. Unlike the Youtube video floating around implying that the wealthiest will fund the have-nots, Romneycare is paid for by the middle class. That is today, we will see how it works out in the long run. However, I suspect that will be the case at the end of the day. The CBO says there is a $100B plus savings over a decade. Ok. Call me a doubter. I think it will be a net increase and it will be the middle class that pays. Just my guess. No better than my Super Bowl prediction.
Now, if the goal is to increase the overall number of people covered by healthcare. That is what I will think will happen. Will the quality of healthcare go up? I suspect for those not previously covered before, but that is probably it.
Lots of crying on this, but I think as usual mostly focused on the wrong areas.
A couple of points in response to this. It was a disaster and it was only on the state level. Now we have a nationalized disaster. Secondly, Democrats and Republicans voted for the Massachusetts law and Obamascare was crammed down our throats by a single party.
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I think you may have missed a point there (or maybe not missed, just don't agree), but I do agree this was crammed down the throats of the minority party. THIS from my point of view caused the problems Obama has getting buy-in from the Republicans.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Pat Fenis again
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Nothing but obstruction and attempts to delay the legislation by senate and house republicans to a plan that was initially written by The Heritage Foundation, asshat senator Mitch McConnell made it clear that making Obama a one-term president was their top priority, yeah, I can't imagine that all 20,000 pages were done in a good faith effort by the republicans.
Puh-leese. I am really going to have to go back and check the congressional record to see if Republicans ever rammed legislation through without ONE single Democrat vote. And BTW the usually smarmy and snarky Jay Carney is starting to get a little pissy in his pressers because usually sympathetic reporters are starting to hit him with tough questions. I am enjoying this.
Until adoption of the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, the U.S. Postal Service functioned as a regular, tax-supported, agency of the federal government.
According to the laws under which it now operates, the U.S. Postal Service is a semi-independent federal agency, mandated to be revenue-neutral. That is, it is supposed to break even, not make a profit.
In 1982, U.S. postage stamps became "postal products," rather than a form of taxation. Since then, the bulk of the cost of operating the postal system has been paid for by customers through the sale of "postal products" and services rather than taxes.
According to the laws under which it now operates, the U.S. Postal Service is a semi-independent federal agency, mandated to be revenue-neutral. That is, it is supposed to break even, not make a profit.
In 1982, U.S. postage stamps became "postal products," rather than a form of taxation. Since then, the bulk of the cost of operating the postal system has been paid for by customers through the sale of "postal products" and services rather than taxes.
Similar threads
