*2016 US Presidential Elections* - Candidates, Statistics, Campaign Timelines, Debates

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Anyone who follows politics and even the novice knows that Clinton had a canned answer ready as her handlers knew the question was coming. She couldn't even answer something spoon fed to her.

As for being a Bernie supporter, my bad.

You're just a garden variety partisan hack.

As someone experienced with earpieces, transmitters and receivers I can tell you that people receiving radio messages behave exactly as she did last night. Rapid eye movements, pauses in speech, etc.... or that could have been symptomatic of Parkinson's.
 
As someone experienced with earpieces, transmitters and receivers I can tell you that people receiving radio messages behave exactly as she did last night. Rapid eye movements, pauses in speech, etc.... or that could have been symptomatic of Parkinson's.

She is wearing her hair over her ears now.

The Clintons will do anything for power.

Fuck that bitch.
 
The pardon can be worded in such a fashion that it will cover her in any scenario imaginable. As long as he issues a pardon before he leaves office, Trump's threat will never be carried out.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_.../2008/07/preemptive_presidential_pardons.html
Good call BC. I guess I totally forgot about how Ford did that for Nixon. But judging by the media not mentioning it I'd say a lot of people forgot as well.

But really, that's such a BS power. To be able to absolve someone of "all offenses against the United States which he … has committed or may have committed or taken part in" is just crazy.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
And to anyone out there wringing their hands about these Hillary/Bill/Trump comparisons, understand this. No one is using her husband's sexual history to compare Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump. Nor is anyone drawing parallels between Bill Clinton and Donald Trump's actions. In fact, no one is highlighting Bill Clinton's rampant history of **** and sexual ***** during his terms as Governor of Arkansas and President, at all. They are highlighting Hillary's role in repeatedly COVERING UP her husband's history of sexual *****. They are highlighting Hillary's role in repeatedly ENABLING her husband's history of sexual *****. They are highlighting Hillary's role in the systematic intimidation and silencing of his accusers of sexual *****. And she didn't do these things to protect her husband, or from any his belief in his innocence. She did these things to protect and preserve his power. So Hillary Clinton is in many ways the judge that enabled a sexual predator to get away with his crimes. No less than seven times. Paula Jones, sexual harassment, 1994. Juanita Broaddrick, ****, 1978. Eileen Wellstone, sexual assault, 1969. Carolyn Moffet, sexual assault, 1979. Elizabeth Ward Gracen, sexual assault, 1982. Helen Dowdy, sexual assault, 1986. Cristy Zercher, sexual assault, 1992. So if you are angry and shocked at the Republican candidate's WORDS -- and you should be -- then you should also be frothing at the goddamn mouth -- and SEVEN times as vocal -- at the Democratic nominee's ACTIONS. Because if you're not? You are a fucking hypocrite.
~ehowa.com

QFT
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Nate Silver has been on a roll for 8 years and Allan Lichtman has been on one for 32 years and came to the same conclusion Silver has until this year yet Silver's data is the only one that counts. Makes sense to me.

Silver hasn't only been on a roll, he's nailed it down to exact electoral counts. If Silver's predictions change, I'll change my opinion without batting an eye, he's got this **** figured out and I learned a long time ago, back in high school to be exact, that arguing against valid statistics is an exercise in futility. I'm not vested in one outcome or another, I think Clinton and Trump both suck.
 
Silver hasn't only been on a roll, he's nailed it down to exact electoral counts. If Silver's predictions change, I'll change my opinion without batting an eye, he's got this **** figured out and I learned a long time ago, back in high school to be exact, that arguing against valid statistics is an exercise in futility. I'm not vested in one outcome or another, I think Clinton and Trump both suck.
He did not predict the exact electoral count in 2008.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
He did not predict the exact electoral count in 2008.

Which just illustrates he's gotten progressively better at what he does. At any rate, dismiss fivethirtyeight if you like, but I'm reminded of a friend of ours that touted "unskewed polls" in the last rodeo and ended up eating liberal amounts of crow in the aftermath.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol

image hosting 30 mb

While I agree the hypocrisy is relevant; the difference is that the people in the photo weren't held to a higher standard, as people running for POTUS should be. Then again, we've as a nation, have set that fucking standard pretty god damn low.

Speaking of low, here's Hilldebeast referring to someone as a "Sand N1663r:"

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/18539

And some words probably best left in the locker room:


upload images free
 
So Trump has declared war on the GOP establishment and is calling for his supporters to vote against the down ticket candidates for not supporting him. Meanwhile, the GOP establishment are reading their local tea leaves and have banished him - their party's nominee, 4 weeks before the election. If the american public really hates the washington insiders club, we'll soon find out.

Go Donald. He's about to go nuclear.
 
Top