Obama trashes America 18 times on foreign soil

[Jack Davenport]

Here are 18 separate attacks he unloaded while in China and Laos:

There are still too many poor ******** in the United States

Too many ******** in America are not getting enough to eat

Despite America's wealth, we’re not providing sufficient educational resources in poor communities

America lacks the “political will” to help poor inner cities that have suffered discrimination.

Americans are “lazy” in thinking we don’t need to learn about foreign nations.

Colin Kapernack is justified protesting the National Anthem, as the NFL star is raising “real, legitimate issues” about things America needs to be talked about.

America suffers from racism, conflicts between ethnic groups, and discrimination against immigrants.

Criticisms of America being imperfect and having problems with racism discrimination are accurate.

America still has “situations where women are not treated equally.”

America “didn't think through” our policy in Vietnam War, as dropping cluster bombs proved counterproductive to "winning hearts and minds."

America’s treatment of Native Americans was “tragic.”

America “struggled to stay true” to our founding ideal that all men are created equal.

When the environment is destroyed in America, it’s because the private sector is being “lazy."

The United States is still to this day learning how to develop industry without destroying the environment.

Due to industrialization, America “used to have terrible pollution … everywhere.”

America’s role in the Vietnam war led to mass displacement of people from their homes.

America dropped more bombs on Laos than on Germany and Japan during World War II … more than 2 million bombs … “the bombs fell like rain.” More bombs, he said on several occasions, were dropped on Laos per capita than anywhere else in the world.

We bombed the “simple homes” of civilians in Laos. “Villages and entire allies were obliterated.” The ancient Plain of Jars “was devastated.” Countless civilians were ******.

https://news.grabien.com/story-montage-18-times-obama-trashed-america-asia

Fuck that God damn piece of **** and any motherfucker that supports him.

 

[GodsEmbryo]

Oh boohoo, cry me a river will ya.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Oh boohoo, cry me a river will ya.

Fuck you. There has been a long standing tradition that American presidents do not criticize America on foreign soil until Obama came along.

I know that you Euro trash enjoy such things especially coming from an American president, but most Americans don't take it lightly.

The next time a jihadi bombs or shoots up your country we'll tell you the same thing.

 

[Mayhem]

:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:

 

[bodie54]

I know that you Euro trash enjoy such things especially coming from an American president, but most Americans don't take it lightly.

Yeah Fuckin A we're all about pretending we're infallible. Introspection? Accountability? That bullshit's for limp wristed pussies. Maintain that façade at all costs baby, even if it doesn't fool a soul and makes us look delusional.

 

[GodsEmbryo]

Fuck you. There has been a long standing tradition that American presidents do not criticize America on foreign soil until Obama came along.

LOL. Well, let me quote Nixon on his visit in China talking to the Chinese Prime Minister (1972): "Let me say to the Prime Minister in a lighter vein that the problem we have in keeping things in confidence in our country are greater then the ones which he has". Just saying that there are a lot of speech transcripts available making your "long standing tradition" a big pile of ****.

I know that you Euro trash enjoy such things especially coming from an American president, but most Americans don't take it lightly.

The next time a jihadi bombs or shoots up your country we'll tell you the same thing.

You know nothing BC. There are two kind of people. The ones who deny reality, pretend nothing's wrong but get mad whenever someone points out a mistake. And the ones who deal with it. If you want to pretend the USA has been a fairy tale country with rainbows and fluffy unicorns, go ahead, that's your problem. Do you think it would have been an "****** on the USA" if you would have read it in a history book? Or in a study? Or if a Republican president would have said it? It wouldn't have changed the reality of what happens/happened. Countless civilians in Laos did get ******. America does suffer from racial issues and polution. There are problems with education. It doesn't change if a president dares to recognize those issues in public, in a foreign country or not.

I always asumed a country loving patriot would understand that and make his country an even "more" beautiful place by recognizing problems and solving them. Alas, there are to many chauvinists (not only in the US by the way) who just stand in a jurk circle around their flag and shout "we're number one!" and get mad whenever something in this country is questioned. Pitty.

So go ahead, cry me a river. I really don't care if you live in denial.

 

[Jack Davenport]

I know that you Euro trash enjoy such things especially coming from an American president, but most Americans don't take it lightly.

Yeah Fuckin A we're all about pretending we're infallible. Introspection? Accountability? That bullshit's for limp wristed pussies. Maintain that façade at all costs baby, even if it doesn't fool a soul and makes us look delusional.

We are the greatest experiment as a country that man ever created. Even with our faults. We don't need a motherfucker who at one point proclaimed that " we aren't blue states or red states but the United States" when he had aspirations of running for and transforming America as the worst thing to ever happen to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. To now in his final weeks as president criticzing the U.S. as if he was some leftist college professor safely ensconced at his job with tenure.
For everything America has done wrong, we have done 10 things right and no country had tried to right their wrongs more than the U.S. nor is there a more free society where you can remind them of it without fear of being imprisoned if you dare to mention it.

Do go fuck yourself too you liberal filth and feel free to leave and take 10 more like you with you on your way out.

 

[Jack Davenport]

LOL. Well, let me quote Nixon on his visit in China talking to the Chinese Prime Minister (1972): "Let me say to the Prime Minister in a lighter vein that the problem we have in keeping things in confidence in our country are greater then the ones which he has". Just saying that there are a lot of speech transcripts available making your "long standing tradition" a big pile of ****.



You know nothing BC. There are two kind of people. The ones who deny reality, pretend nothing's wrong but get mad whenever someone points out a mistake. And the ones who deal with it. If you want to pretend the USA has been a fairy tale country with rainbows and fluffy unicorns, go ahead, that's your problem. Do you think it would have been an "****** on the USA" if you would have read it in a history book? Or in a study? Or if a Republican president would have said it? It wouldn't have changed the reality of what happens/happened. Countless civilians in Laos did get ******. America does suffer from racial issues and polution. There are problems with education. It doesn't change if a president dares to recognize those issues in public, in a foreign country or not.

I always asumed a country loving patriot would understand that and make his country an even "more" beautiful place by recognizing problems and solving them. Alas, there are to many chauvinists (not only in the US by the way) who just stand in a jurk circle around their flag and shout "we're number one!" and get mad whenever something in this country is questioned. Pitty.

So go ahead, cry me a river. I really don't care if you live in denial.

Pointing out that keeping things is confidence isn't exactly a major critique of American society and is more a criticism of the functions of government. Is that all you fucking have? Compare that to an American president that takes every opportunity to criticize the country he leads to other countries instead of filing his grievances here where they belong to be addressed. He wouldn't dare have pointed out all of his deeply harbored resentment when he was running for election in 2008 or reelection in 2012. No he waits until his second term and final weeks to take his final jabs at America.

He is the Barry from Hawaii and the one that attended a Madrasa in Indonesia now. The same motherfucker that listened to the same **** every Sunday from a Marxist pastor.

To some of us, it was clear what he was and is, to others he was the Messiah.

Nobody ever claimed America is perfect, we have a segment of society that enjoy being on the Democrat plantation. To most of them excelling academically is trying "to be white" those problems will never be legislated to a successful end. But in the end, America has done far more to further the cause of freedom than any other country that ever existed and that is an undeniable fact.

Now if you didn't hear me the first time, kindly go fuck yourself.

 

[GodsEmbryo]

Is that all you fucking have?

LOL. You wanted an entire list or what? Riiiight, so it's "more a criticism of the functions of the government". But education for example must be... a function of the boyscouts I asume

You really don't get it do you...

BC needs a hug, poor BC

 

[Jack Davenport]

LOL. You wanted an entire list or what? Riiiight, so it's "more a criticism of the functions of the government". But education for example must be... a function of the boyscouts I asume

You really don't get it do you...

BC needs a hug, poor BC

I know being Belgian is generally an impediment but try and follow along.

Democrats have been in charge of the educational system in this country for the better part of 60 years. It is a function of liberal policies. Even GWB got caught up in it with No ***** Left Behind. Not to mention failures like Common Core.

If anyone needs a hug, it is the poor victims of Democrat teachers and professors on just about every level.

I attended private school until my sophomore year. I decided I wanted to graduate with my friends. The curriculum being taught as a sophomore and junior were taught at the private school in the 7th and 8th grades.

Needless to say it was a breeze and I was taking college credits by my senior
year in high school.

 

[sean miguel]

No country is perfect and no one is claiming the U.S. is or has been. But we're grading on a curve. And what purpose does that serve for an American president to go abroad and repeatedly criticize his own country?

Yeah, I'm going with piece-of-**** Saul Alinksyite.

 

[Will E Worm]

His policies led to less jobs. Barry ignores the Constitution and our rights.

Barry has ****** more people with his actions than anyone.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/noam-chomsky-obama-is-running-biggest-terrorist-operation-that-exists/


Barry also wants to allow more illegals into America to put an even bigger burden on Americans.


Deportations have to start soon.

 

[Supafly]

Some of our fellow members have already pointd this out.

I'll just say: There is a difference between naming this you know are still to be worked on towards the better direction and "trashing"

You should be aware of this difference. Unless you are just annoyed by ANYTHING a political opponemnt does.

 

[GodsEmbryo]

Looks like your education wasn't of much use. It's the second time you beat around the bush and avoid the main topic and frankly it's irrelevant. Let's start with the obvious

There has been a long standing tradition that American presidents do not criticize America on foreign soil until Obama came along.

I only need one criticism of a president before Obama to make your point invalid. I did. So you're wrong.

Pointing out that keeping things is confidence isn't exactly a major critique of American society and is more a criticism of the functions of government

It doesn't matter that you try to paint it as something not about this or that to wriggle your way out of it. If you would consider "criticism of the functions of the government" a valid point for someone 'not attacking' the US I can easily point out one of these 18 "attacks" that's about education. That's a function of the governement as well. It can't be both valid and invalid at the same time. So, you're wrong

blah blah blah private education

So what, you still have State Regulations. You're still wrong.

Democrats have been in charge of the educational system

If you identify this as the problem, good for you, but it's irrelevant for the topic.

Which brings us back to the topic: calling someting trashing and attacking the US... by simply saying on foreign soil what's already known.
The internet (something you can consider very international), libraries, educational systems... full of information and statements on these 18 things. There are hundreds of books, studies, publications, debates... written about it. Facts and figures all around. But when a president mentions it (he doesn't even go into detail), it suddenly becomes an ****** on his own country. Just because he dares to say it in a foreign country. And why?

Compare that to an American president that takes every opportunity to criticize the country he leads to other countries instead of filing his grievances here where they belong to be addressed.

Do you dare to say that your president never addressed the racial issues, the shootings, education, poverty, food for ****, etc...? Internet is a bitch dude, articles allover the place.

Which leaves only one thing: it's an ****** on the US because he said it in a foreign country. An ******... Yeah.

Little BC had has eeny-weely fweelings hurt, boohoo, BC needs a hug

Here's a picture of a kitty

photo uploading websites

 

[Jack Davenport]

Looks like your education wasn't of much use. It's the second time you beat around the bush and avoid the main topic and frankly it's irrelevant. Let's start with the obvious

Avoided it how? You brought up the educational system in the U.S. I addressed it. Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit.

I only need one criticism of a president before Obama to make your point invalid. I did. So you're wrong.

And a **** poor example it was. I am sure you Googled diligently to find other examples of presidents trashing America on foreign soil. Suffice it to say that was the best you could come up with. And you will never find examples that will reach the level of Obama. He tipped his hand with his apology tour in Egypt when he first took office. But he went balls out once he was reelected.

It doesn't matter that you try to paint it as something not about this or that to wriggle your way out of it. If you would consider "criticism of the functions of the government" a valid point for someone 'not attacking' the US I can easily point out one of these 18 "attacks" that's about education. That's a function of the governement as well. It can't be both valid and invalid at the same time. So, you're wrong

Democrats have created the curriculum and have been in charge of congress for the majority of the past 60 years. One of the best examples of Democrat failure within the function and nuances of government.

So what, you still have State Regulations. You're still wrong.

The state only regulates teacher qualifications and minimum curriculum requirements. Private and home schoolers run circles around students of public education.

If you identify this as the problem, good for you, but it's irrelevant for the topic.

You cherry picked one Obama criticism for discussion. So you made it part of the topic of discussion.

Which brings us back to the topic: calling someting trashing and attacking the US... by simply saying on foreign soil what's already known.
The internet (something you can consider very international), libraries, educational systems... full of information and statements on these 18 things. There are hundreds of books, studies, publications, debates... written about it. Facts and figures all around. But when a president mentions it (he doesn't even go into detail), it suddenly becomes an ****** on his own country. Just because he dares to say it in a foreign country. And why?

We have unwritten rules prior to Obama. One is that you do not criticize America on foreign soil. Obama considers himself a trailblazer in breaking tradition. He has done it on a level that it gives leftists, especially foreign leftists like you boners.

Do you dare to say that your president never addressed the racial issues, the shootings, education, poverty, food for ****, etc...? Internet is a bitch dude, articles allover the place.

He can address whatever the fuck he wants. There are over 300 million Americans that he needs to bitch and moan to. Not Laotians and the Chinese.

Which leaves only one thing: it's an ****** on the US because he said it in a foreign country. An ******... Yeah.

it's an ****** on the U.S. because he is criticizing the country he leads on foreign soil. You will find very few if any world leaders willing to engage in such behavior.

Little BC had has eeny-weely fweelings hurt, boohoo, BC needs a hug

No not really. It seems you are the one who wears their feelings on their sleeve.

Here's a picture of a kitty

Well at least you like some form of pussy. I didn't think you liked it at all to be honest.

 

[sean miguel]

America still has “situations where women are not treated equally.”

But Obama repeatedly praises islam where women are treated equally.


the stupid fucking left - those dependable useful idiots.

For while Communists make full use of liberals and their solicitudes, and sometimes flatter them to their faces, in private they treat them with that sneering contempt that the strong and predatory almost invariably feel for victims who volunteer to help in their own victimization.

-Whittaker Chambers

 

[Supafly]

But Obama repeatedly praises islam where women are treated equally.


the stupid fucking left - those dependable useful idiots.

That is, in fact, not a contradiction

 

[The Yak]

I'm becoming concerned that so many of you are sober enough on a Saturday afternoon to produce these voluminous, point-by-point takedowns of one another. Have a ***** for Christ's sake.

 

[Jagger69]

I'm becoming concerned that so many of you are sober enough on a Saturday afternoon to produce these voluminous, point-by-point takedowns of one another. Have a ***** for Christ's sake.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to The Yak again.

With the Houston game nearing a very successful conclusion (up 42-0 on Lamar late in the 4th quarter) as we speak and with the Longhorns game coming up shortly afterwards, my (and those fellow degenerates who are willing to accompany me in same) direction is quite likely to start heading down the HOV lane on the ******* Expressway (if it hasn't already to be truthful) on a fairly concurrent ratio with the aforementioned football action so all I can say in retrospect is that rarely, if ever, has so much never been said by so few concerning so little that has already been said by so many.

Hopefully, that is more what you have been looking for in the way of commentary, my dear Yak buddy....:****::dunno::*****:

 

[Johan]

Obama acknowledges America's not perfect, how outrageous, how unpatriotic !