I wish. That was one of the most exciting periods in the history of open wheel formula car racing. Both turbos and normally aspirated engines were allowed back then. Unlike today, Indy was pretty much a "run what ya brung" race. Now, dumbed down, normally aspirated, V8 spec engines are the rule.They now keep the horsepower down (the 2.65 turbos could top 1000 horsepower), and glue the cars to the track with massive downforce to keep the formula easy enough, so even half-talents like D@nica Patrick and Marco Andretti can look like they know what they're doing.
Turbo 4's and 6's were used in Formula One in the 80's... and that was also one of the most exciting periods in F1's history. The BMW turbo 4 was said to have roughly 1300 horsepower in qualifying trim. The engines under the current 2.4 V8 formula probably have 750 horsepower on a good day (cool, damp air on qualifying day). Premium Link Upgrade . The turbo era was fantastic, though I also loved the V12's (especially the Ferraris). But the V10 formula was quite boring (IMO) and this rev limited V8 formula is the absolute worst, as far as technical innovation and excitement. When was the last time anyone talked about F1 engines during a race broadcast? The only engine formulas more boring than what F1 uses now is the IRL formula and the NASCAR formula. Even the Grand Am formula is more exciting (IMO).
I look forward to the new turbo era. Unlike the old turbo formula, now that we've come SO far in electronics, I expect the turbo lag to be less. And I think the racing can be as good or better than last year because of the KERS addition. F1 is about innovation and staying on the edge of the curve. I say, bring it on!!! :nanner:
The best engine in formula 1 was the cosworth v8, followed by the zetec r v8 ******. Let's not forget schumi's multiple crowns with ferrari v8s, v10s and v12s.
You forgot also to speak about the yellow teapot era with the 1977 yellow renault turbo and with 1985 the mc laren tag porsche. It was an era that was brilliant by its technology and capacity of innovation.
You also forgot to mention about transam and canam, two highly respect disciplines from the late sixties till the mid seventies.
I was just speaking to the post that suggested that 4 cylinder turbo engines were somehow yesterday's news or were irrelevant.
:why:
Wow. Somebody sure did project an imagined meaning into my post.
Turbo 4 bangers. What is this, Indy cars from the 70's?
Sorry if I read you wrong. You meant this as a good thing? :dunno:
Anyway, I didn't mean to paint you into a corner. That you even know about 1970's Indycars and you're here among us makes me happy. Seriously, no hard feelings.
George Harrson's song about Niki Lauda, Jackie Stewart, and his good friend Emerson Fittapaldi.![]()
I was simply drawing a comparison to a bygone era. It wasn't a judgment about whether or not it's a good thing.
In fact, I sorely miss the open formats of the past. Not to the point of run away escalation, but in terms of innovation where teams achieved their success by being clever by choice or by circumstance... not because of suppressive rules.
I feel like F1 is turning into NASCAR more and more.
I've driven Silverstone - in an Aston Martin DB4, Fun!
Back on topic, I'm really disappointed to see team orders back. I've always thought ordering a driver to race in a certain way to be against the principle of genuine competition.