Yeah, they did. But as I've posted before, if you remember that game Boise State pretty much dominated it for three quarters. Then Oklahoma woke up and COMPLETE ERASED their substantial deficit in less than one quarter. Boise State ended up winning that game in overtime, that is true, but by the end of the game it took some trick plays for them to beat the Sooners. Props to Boise State for winning that game, but I'll forever maintain that had the Sooners taken the Boise State Broncos seriously in that game from the beginning instead of waiting until the fourth quarter, I don't think think that Boise State would have stood much of a chance. Same thing with Boise State's win over the Oregon Ducks in Autzen this season. They got a BIG lead and then watched it mostly evaporate once the Oregon Ducks got serious. The Ducks (and this coming from someone who is NOT an Oregon Duck fan) damn near won that game - they only ran out of time at the end after digging themselves too big a hole at the beginning. Boise State is dominant in the freakin' WAC - no matter what anybody posts, I'll NEVER believe that they could be that dominant playing in a REAL football conference and having to play strong opposition EVERY WEEK and I'll remind you that Boise State lost to the Washington Huskies last year, a team that started 2 - 0 and then finished the season 4 - 9 and in LAST PLACE in the Pac-10.
This post and some of your other posts are complete nonsense, Luv. What the hell does Boise State's performance last year mean for this year? NOTHING DUDE. Leave it in the past. I know that, in your mind, Ohio State was good enough last year so that must be the reason why they are in the BCS this year, but that faulty logic ***** THE SANCTITY OF THE BCS.
Boise State would beat you beloved Ohio State THIS YEAR. Not NEXT YEAR and not LAST YEAR. THIS SEASON. YES, THEY WOULD because THIS YEAR'S BUCKEYES SUCK. Plain and simple. The Buckeyes had their chance to make their case and lost their 2 most important games. Ohio State and USC AND Boise State are all being harmed by their conferences overall shittiness collectively. But tOSU had its chances this season to win and they didn't in the big games.
Texas is going to pound them and frankly, as a Buckeyes fan, the last thing I would think you'd want for your team is watching them getting a pounding on national TV in a bowl game BECAUSE THE ENTIRE NATION will be venting frustration at Ohio State for not belonging in the BCS!
Is it Boise State's fault that their "superior" opponents don't take them seriously in your eyes? Seriously? Do you think Boise State gives a **** about that? They play. They win. End of story.
I fail to see how you claim Ohio State would play better in the USC game if only Pryor had more experience. Dude. That's another lame excuse. Maybe USC would've hung 80 on Ohio State if Sanchez had more experience. It was his first season starting too.:dunno:
I am the Boise State dicklicker on this board, so keep that in mind. I do believe Boise State should leave the WAC and head into the Mountain West. Will the MWC want a potential Goliath program in their conference? Maybe, maybe not. But I don't think they can be held accountable for their opponents on their schdule playing great or sucking. You make the schedule and you play the opponent. Nobody has a crystal ball to determine WHICH TEAMS WILL BE AWESOME IN 4 Years and which teams will suck..these schedules are determined years in advance you know. Fresno State tries to play any bigname opponent for ALL THEIR OOC. They win some. They lose some. But this strategy means they've never won a Conf CHampionship since Boise State became a power. Maybe this is not the best strategy in the BCS universe.
Boise State has had 4 undefeated seasons in 7 years? They're not as bad as you seem to think. Oregon was ranked #19 when the beat them. Maybe Boise State will try to get some OOC games with some national powers but will the national powers want to to play them now...:dunno:
