Your thoughts on porn sites that post out of focus/poor quality photos

[Mr. Daystar]

IMO porn is not art. It's smut, it's filth, and I'm perfectly fine with that. You know why it's called art? Because some guy got caught looking at it by his wife and he told her it was art LOL.

Yeah, well to the people producing it, it might be. It sure as hell isn't on par with Nat Geo, but the guy with the camera might take his work more seriously then we do. Which is why I put quotation marks around the word art. It was a little jab at porn photographers.

Another point not being considered is, auto focus digital cameras might refocus, or try to find a new focal point, if the model moves. As far as those Brandi Love pics go John, I would bet my last dollar they were on purpose, to show off some new shoes, or because a fan sent them to her.

 

[bigg mike]

Here's another one. WTF?

 

[Mr. Daystar]

That's not a picture, that's a screen capture. Or I should say that's what I THINK it looks like.

 

[FreeOnes_Adam]

Definitely seeing some video screen captures in this thread. They never look as good as a proper image, but the video generally looks good, despite the crappy screen caps.

 

[bigg mike]

But it still looks bad. Why post it?

 

[Mr. Daystar]

But it still looks bad. Why post it?

Because some would rather have a lil sumpin', then nothing. I prefer quality to quantity, others not so much. The other thing is, most people are posting freebies from around the web. The good quality hi res, probably comes from the $29 per month section. I'm not sure if we're even allowed to post that stuff from the member section. Could be a legal thing too.