i would. but give me something like this: http://tour.shemalestrokers.com/07/khloehart/shemale_khloehart.html
Emmmmmmm no...
Only with Areeya in a extreme case...
She/he is Areeya:
http://www.nude-gallery-free.com/galleries/shemales/shemale-1045/indexph.html
http://www.trannyseductions.com/2142/ladyboy-areeya-in-the-kitchen-2142Pchnt.htm
http://www.trannyseductions.com/2240/ladyboy-in-the-shower-2240Pchnt.htm
Her face is a little pretty but.... mmm... ugh...
Emmmmmmm no...
Only with Areeya in a extreme case...
She/he is Areeya:
http://www.nude-gallery-free.com/galleries/shemales/shemale-1045/indexph.html
http://www.trannyseductions.com/2142/ladyboy-areeya-in-the-kitchen-2142Pchnt.htm
http://www.trannyseductions.com/2240/ladyboy-in-the-shower-2240Pchnt.htm
Her face is a little pretty but.... mmm... ugh...
It's good to have a goal.
They're not chicks with dicks. They are dudes with tits! - Jesus in a hustler ad parody.
Soo... No.
I take the Ancient Roman view on things like this.
If you are the one doing the fucking, then you are not "gay". As long as you are the "top" or the "dominant" partner, then you are just being "super-masculine", like any good virile male should be.
But if you are the one bending over and getting fucked, or kneeling down and sucking it, then you are "effeminate", and practically a woman. As long as you behave like "bottom" or a "submissive", you are fair game for sexual conquest.