World-Class Nudes

The Yak · May 30, 2020

wmonbear said:
note: All that's needed is just 1 other member to agree that this pic is exceptional, i.e. "world class", for it to qualify for tournament entry.

This may or may not count but you see that user Freq3 appears to have offered a thumbs-up reaction to my post on the picture in question. Could that count as a second vote? One could assume Freq3 agrees that the picture is of high-quality based on that.

Prod3 · May 30, 2020

The Yak said:
View attachment 783202

This may or may not count but you see that user Freq3 appears to have offered a thumbs-up reaction to my post on the picture in question. Could that count as a second vote? One could assume Freq3 agrees that the picture is of high-quality based on that.

I will make it clear that it was a reaction to you for putting a "thumbs up" against the picture I submitted and not actually for the picture itself.

However, me putting the picture up in the first place is kind of a "thumbs up" in its own right, as I think the picture, and any picture I put up, is very nice and should be submitted into competition. I'm guessing it will be the same for anyone who submits a picture here.
I think we need clarification from wmonbear whether putting the picture up in the first place counts as a thumbs up. 🙂

wmonbear · May 30, 2020

Freq3 said:
I will make it clear that it was a reaction to you for putting a "thumbs up" against the picture I submitted and not actually for the picture itself.

However, me putting the picture up in the first place is kind of a "thumbs up" in its own right, as I think the picture, and any picture I put up, is very nice and should be submitted into competition. I'm guessing it will be the same for anyone who submits a picture here.
I think we need clarification from wmonbear whether putting the picture up in the first place counts as a thumbs up. 🙂

Sorry, members cannot second their own nominations. Two (2) other members must also find the pic "tourney worthy" for it to qualify.

Prod3 · May 30, 2020

wmonbear said:
Sorry, members cannot second their own nominations. Two (2) other members must also find the pic "tourney worthy" for it to qualify.

Thats what I thought 🙂

The Yak · May 30, 2020

wmonbear said:
Sorry, members cannot second their own nominations. Two (2) other members must also find the pic "tourney worthy" for it to qualify.

Didn't realize he was the one who submitted the picture. My fault.

wmonbear · May 31, 2020

Click here for previous page nominations.
See a pic you believe to be stellar? Simply "like it" or give it a

, ☑ , or

.
Absent my stamp of approval, if 2 or more members "second" its nomination, it will officially qualify for tournament entry.

DuanCulo · Jun 2, 2020

DuanCulo · Jun 3, 2020

wmonbear · Jun 4, 2020

⬆ note: Luxman's "like" is for the post in general, as it does not specify any of the photos singularly.

Luxman · Jun 4, 2020

I liked photos 3, 4, and 5 in post #1108 by DuanCulo.

wmonbear · Jun 4, 2020

Luxman said:
I liked photos 3, 4, and 5 in post #1108 by DuanCula.

Got it! 😉

Prod3 · Jun 7, 2020

DuanCulo said:
View attachment 784710

Its got 3 thumbs up from me as I like this picture a lot, but still counts as just one for the purposes of the selection process

wmonbear · Jun 7, 2020

DuanCulo said:
View attachment 784710

This photo nomination has now been twice endorsed (i.e., seconded), thus qualifying it for tournament entry.

Prod3 · Jun 7, 2020

wmonbear said:
#1085A... seconding this nomination. ☑

wmonbear said:
This photo nomination has now been twice endorsed (i.e., seconded), thus qualifying it for tournament entry.

@wmonbear - Just a bit confused about these two when it comes to seconding. I do understand any picture needs 2 endorsements after the nomination to make it through to competition.

Post #1085A has been "seconded" by yourself but not gone through to the approved stage with your picture of the stamp. This was the only ☑ or

for this picture.

However #1108C that was recently put up was also "seconded" by myself after Luxman.

Just wondering which picture has the correct "Seconded" statement?

Sorry for splitting hairs and being pedantic 🤪

wmonbear · Jun 8, 2020

Freq3 said:
@wmonbear - Just a bit confused about these two when it comes to seconding. I do understand any picture needs 2 endorsements after the nomination to make it through to competition.

Post #1085A has been "seconded" by yourself but not gone through to the approved stage with your picture of the stamp. This was the only ☑ or for this picture.

However #1108C that was recently put up was also "seconded" by myself after Luxman.

Just wondering which picture has the correct "Seconded" statement?

Sorry for splitting hairs and being pedantic 🤪

For a picture to qualify for tournament competition, 2 or more members (other than the submitter) must "second" its nomination.
Occasionally, I will give my stamp of approval as a lone endorser in those instances that I'm 'blown away' by a photo.
But more often, I simply "second" the nomination and wait for another member to ratify it for approval.
This was the case with post #1085A. Other than myself, no one else has endorsed it, so it remains ineligible for tournament entry.
Hope this answers your question.

Prod3 · Jun 8, 2020

wmonbear said:
For a picture to qualify for tournament competition, 2 or more members (other than the submitter) must "second" its nomination.
Occasionally, I will give my stamp of approval as a lone endorser in those instances that I'm 'blown away' by a photo.
But more often, I simply "second" the nomination and wait for another member to ratify it for approval.
This was the case with post #1085A. Other than myself, no one else has endorsed it, so it remains ineligible for tournament entry.
Hope this answers your question.

Thanks for clearing that up wmonbear