World-Class Nudes
- Thread starter wmonbear
- Start date
Fresh photos for you!
Last edited:
Liza V @ Art of CK
If I could just see her mouth as well, this pic would have had my endorsement.
Prod3
Expect Nothing and Appreciate Everything
@shag1993 and @Supafly I'm just curious whether the
you both left against my submitted image were supposed to be an actual seconding or not from you?I believe the most recent rules issued by @wmonbear stipulate that any "likes" or "loves" don't go towards a seconding and you have to post a comment or
❤️ to get it seconded. Please correct me if I am wrong though @wmonbearI am unaware if you both (@shag1993 & @Supafly) know the rule or not as at one time any "likes" or "loves" did go towards seconding, but now is NOT the case as far as I know.
With this in mind, I am confused that if you both do know the most recent rule, why you marked the picture as "love", but then didn't second the picture?
IMO it does seem odd to "love" a picture but then not following it up by seconding it! I would understand if you left a "like" but didn't go any further though.
Sorry if this post comes across as pedantic (again), but I am Black and White when it comes to these things, and figuring out the middle ground doesn't come easy to me!
Luxman
#TRE45ON
The photo would be better if her entire face was visible.If I could just see her mouth as well, this pic would have had my endorsement.
Totally agree... if someone "loves" a photo by clicking the@shag1993 and @Supafly I'm just curious whether the
I believe the most recent rules issued by @wmonbear stipulate that any "likes" or "loves" don't go towards a seconding and you have to post a comment or
I am unaware if you both (@shag1993 & @Supafly) know the rule or not as at one time any "likes" or "loves" did go towards seconding, but now is NOT the case as far as I know.
With this in mind, I am confused that if you both do know the most recent rule, why you marked the picture as "love", but then didn't second the picture?
IMO it does seem odd to "love" a picture but then not following it up by seconding it! I would understand if you left a "like" but didn't go any further though.
Sorry if this post comes across as pedantic (again), but I am Black and White when it comes to these things, and figuring out the middle ground doesn't come easy to me!
emoji, they should then follow-up with a post to second it.If one doesn't intend to second a nomination, they can choose to view it without comment, or "like" it to indicate it has some appeal, but does not meet their qualifying standard.
yes i second your leaf lover **********@shag1993 and @Supafly I'm just curious whether the
I believe the most recent rules issued by @wmonbear stipulate that any "likes" or "loves" don't go towards a seconding and you have to post a comment or
I am unaware if you both (@shag1993 & @Supafly) know the rule or not as at one time any "likes" or "loves" did go towards seconding, but now is NOT the case as far as I know.
With this in mind, I am confused that if you both do know the most recent rule, why you marked the picture as "love", but then didn't second the picture?
IMO it does seem odd to "love" a picture but then not following it up by seconding it! I would understand if you left a "like" but didn't go any further though.
Sorry if this post comes across as pedantic (again), but I am Black and White when it comes to these things, and figuring out the middle ground doesn't come easy to me!
I second and no didn't know rule
1726**********
gmase
It's a new dawn.
The rules are the rules, but I would suggest it is possible toTotally agree... if someone "loves" a photo by clicking the
If one doesn't intend to second a nomination, they can choose to view it without comment, or "like" it to indicate it has some appeal, but does not meet their qualifying standard.
a photo without considering it to be 'World Class". For example, this picture of Angela White is quite lovely. You could draw a straight line from her butthole, through her pussy, between her boobs, and - finally - reaching her nose. They are all in perfect alignment. But, alas, it's just a basic porn pic. I love it, but it's not 'World Class'.
The rules are the rules, but I would suggest it is possible to
For example, this picture of Angela White is quite lovely. You could draw a straight line from her butthole, through her pussy, between her boobs, and - finally - reaching her nose. They are all in perfect alignment. But, alas, it's just a basic porn pic. I love it, but it's not 'World Class'.
View attachment 873179
You make a valid point, my friend!
This is not only a valid point, but a world class point.You make a valid point, my friend!
Does anyone second this? 😜
Prod3
Expect Nothing and Appreciate Everything
The rules are the rules, but I would suggest it is possible to
For example, this picture of Angela White is quite lovely. You could draw a straight line from her butthole, through her pussy, between her boobs, and - finally - reaching her nose. They are all in perfect alignment. But, alas, it's just a basic porn pic. I love it, but it's not 'World Class'.
View attachment 873179
But this thread is not for basic porn pics like that of Angela White, and I wouldn't think of posting one like that here, as nice as it is to see everything lined up. wmonbear has said we all have to find top drawer, artistic, sensual and sexy pictures.
I believe everything I post in this thread conforms to what wmonbear has asked for in one way or another IMO (which other members who post here may have a difference of opinion with).
As I said in my original post, I find it odd that with the artistic picture that I posted, or any other artistic/sensual/sexy pictures someone may post, if someone "loved" it, they didn't actually nominate it as well.
If this was a thread for pictures like that of Angela White, and someone "loved" it, wouldn't you think that it should be considered for nomination from the person who "loved" it as well?
I guess wmonbear will be the judge of this one! 😁
Interesting discussion, but the bottom line remains unchanged... photo nominations must receive at least 2 posted "endorsements" before qualifying for tournament entry.
Last edited:
gmase
It's a new dawn.
We all agree this is a thread for "top drawer, artistic, sensual and sexy pictures." No one (especially me) is stating otherwise.
The like, love distinction reminds me of Spinal Tap and turning it up to 11. I could use no reaction,
, or as the scale or use no reaction, , , or nominate. It's all the same scale with different points of reference.I'm not disagreeing with you at all. Just pointing out how someone could think or believe differently. (A frequent problem of mine actually.
)
