Photo #1458 has been twice seconded, qualifying it for tournament entry.
Last edited:
World-Class Nudes
- Thread starter wmonbear
- Start date
Photo #1458 has been twice seconded, qualifying it for tournament entry.
Harpsman
Light one for Me
Prod3
Expect Nothing and Appreciate Everything
⬆ Remember, "liking" is not the same as seconding.
Yes, I do find it strange that someone may "like" a picture you put up, but then not nominate it IMO. As a rule I don't do that on this thread as it may cause confusion. If I like a picture enough I will "second" it with a post, and that is it, so it is clear cut!
FYI it doesn't mean to say I don't like other pictures that I don't "second", they're just not "second" material in my eyes.
A selection of 10 from me as its Christmas too... I've been saving a few nice ones up for the occasion
Yes, I do find it strange that someone may "like" a picture you put up, but then not nominate it IMO. As a rule I don't do that on this thread as it may cause confusion. If I like a picture enough I will "second" it with a post, and that is it, so it is clear cut!
FYI it doesn't mean to say I don't like other pictures that I don't "second", they're just not "second" material in my eyes.
A selection of 10 from me as its Christmas too... I've been saving a few nice ones up for the occasion
1468B,1468F, and 1468G have each been seconded and as such are officially qualified for tournament entry.
Last edited:
Harpsman
Light one for Me
Cant believe no-one has backed this picture
That's why I stopped posting in this thread for about 9 months. Picture of the Day and Best Non-Nude are the best source for these pictures.
For what it's worth 1468 F & 1468 G.
Luxman
#TRE45ON
The model looks good, but would look better facing the camera, and the lighting should be on the camera side.
Also the background is hazy and the resolution quality of the photo isn't great.
Click on pic for photoshoot and better hi-res version of photo #1462
I like this photo more from the same photoshoot. She's facing the camera, the lighting is good, and the background looks better.
Premium Link Upgrade
Last edited:
Prod3
Expect Nothing and Appreciate Everything
I agree with Luxman there. On one hand the original picture is showing its original colour and tones, but I think it could have been touched up a bit to bring it to life IMO
One example:
(Re-framed with a bit of light taken out and added more colour, contrast and warmth, plus vignette)
Cant believe no-one has backed this picture
That's why I stopped posting in this thread for about 9 months. Picture of the Day and Best Non-Nude are the best source for these pictures.
Although I didn't second pic 1462, I did "like" the post overall, as the featured model (Chanel Fenn aka Victoria Sokolova) happens to be one of my current faves
and I do like the photo set as a whole. In fact, there are at least a couple of pics within it I would've seconded had they been nominated.
Regarding the actual pic that was posted from the set, I guess I'd place it in the OK category... the model is just too distant from the viewer, imo.
Compare/contrast it with photo 1463/1470. This one, approved for tournament entry, frames the model much closer to the viewer.
Last edited:
Harpsman
Light one for Me
Fair enough, I saw the full set, it was just the picture took my eye. As for facing the camera, you endorsed 1468 G (as I did too) and the model has her back to the camera.
Fair enough, nice job - not a fan of 'touched up' pics, although most of them are processed in an enhanced way
Again, fair enough, even if a little uber critical.
Cheers
Luxman
#TRE45ON
I meant only her head facing or turned towards the camera, and the sunlight on her body on the camera side instead of only on top.
1468-G has a very sexy butt.
Last edited:
