Women Objectify Themselves

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Women Objectify Themselves

Sexual objectification should not be blamed on guys. MOST of the time it is instigated and perpetuated by women. Let's all JUST be honest about that :-) No harm, no foul.


Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread
 
"It's not my fault I sexually assaulted her, officer. My penis does all my thinking for me."

"Oh ok then. No problem"

:facepalm: :facepalm:
 
I have no problems with women objectifying themselves because they CHOOSED to do so. It's a form of enpowerment to flaunt your body for a purpose you choosed.

When Beyoncé chooses to flaunt her ass, thighs, cleavage, etc. in her music videos she decided to do so and she's the one who will benefit of it.
When FEMEN topless activists protest do their top-less protests, they chosed to do so and they make their case heard.
When a teenager posts sexy pictures of her on social medias, they choosed to do so.

But when you have hal-naked woman on **** or car adds, they did not coosed to appear on billboards. When women are forbidded to were pants on air on Fox News, when women are groped in public transports or cat-called in the street because they wear a skirt, they did not choosed to do so and they don't benefit from it.
 
The advertisement and Fox News examples don't wash, Johan, those women are remunerated in exchange for their exhibitionism, yes, they do, in fact have a choice. The groping on public transport and in the street examples are on point, though.
 
I have no problems with women objectifying themselves because they CHOOSED to do so. It's a form of enpowerment to flaunt your body for a purpose you choosed.

When Beyoncé chooses to flaunt her ass, thighs, cleavage, etc. in her music videos she decided to do so and she's the one who will benefit of it.

and the fact that Beyoncé can't dance or I should say dances like a 150 lb halibut you just hauled on board is no fault of her own. Apparently, you either have it, or you don't.
 
The advertisement and Fox News examples don't wash, Johan, those women are remunerated in exchange for their exhibitionism, yes, they do, in fact have a choice. The groping on public transport and in the street examples are on point, though.

Choosing between agreeing to do that or leave your job, I do not consider this as a real choice. I would compare that to Daech ordering every people who does not embrace radical islam to either embrace it or be slaughtered by jihadis. That's not a choice.
 
I would compare that to Daech ordering every people who does not embrace radical islam to either embrace it or be slaughtered by jihadis. That's not a choice.

Actually, that is a choice. And some people choose not to denounce their own faith and convert to Islam and knowingly suffer the consequences.

THAT is what a martyr is.
 
Choosing between agreeing to do that or leave your job, I do not consider this as a real choice. I would compare that to Daech ordering every people who does not embrace radical islam to either embrace it or be slaughtered by jihadis. That's not a choice.

So you're equivocating ****** with finding another job. Ok, Punchy, we will have to agree to disagree on that point.
 
Choosing between agreeing to do that or leave your job, I do not consider this as a real choice. I would compare that to Daech ordering every people who does not embrace radical islam to either embrace it or be slaughtered by jihadis. That's not a choice.

Let me correct you sir. It is not a choice to keep or leave a job. It is a free choice to accept a job. Uniforms and dress codes are completely up to the employer.
 
I don't feel it's good to ********** insert your wiener or any of your 10 fingers into a lady's vagina or anus but if she intentionally dresses in revealing clothing it's perfectly fine to make specific and descriptive comments about the flesh and body parts she's exposing even if you accidentally brush up against her with your erection several times during an 8 hour work period.
 
Back
Top