Woman 'hit on the head with boss's genitals' awarded $95 million in compensation

Although sexual harassment needs to be harshly dealt with isn't $95 million an obscene amount of money that may end up costing a lot of people at Aaron their jobs? And why wait a year after the harassment starts, why not quit your job after the first/second incident and call the cops on the scumbag so he couldn't hurt anyone else, what she said he did went far beyond an internal complaint.

Woman 'hit on the head with boss's genitals' awarded $95 million in largest sex harassment award ever


article-2002112-0C810BD000000578-994_233x337.jpg

Ashley Alford said she was assaulted by a store manager at Aaron's furniture store

A woman has been awarded a staggering $95 million in compensation in a sexual harassment case against her former employers - believed to be America's highest ever payout.

Ashley Alford, in her mid 20s, won the award from her former employers, Aaron's of St Louis, after a manager in the furniture and electrical store allegedly attacked her in a stockroom, lifting her shirt and masturbating over her while holding her down.

Prosecutors alleged Richard Moore - who is still awaiting trial - would pinch Miss Alford and make inappropriate comments before the 2006 attack.

They say on two occasions he hit her on the head with his penis.

On the second occasion, in October 2006, he was also said to have held her down on the warehouse floor, lifted her shirt and masturbated until he ejaculated on her.

Miss Alford's lawyer David Ratner said: 'From what we can tell, this is the absolute largest sex harassment verdict in the country for an individual plaintiff.'

Miss Alford claimed the assault came after almost a year of escalating harassment in a work environment, 'rife with sexual jokes and lewd propositions.'

article-2002112-0C8109D600000578-631_468x567.jpg

Happier times: Mrs Alford is seen here at a Halloween party three years after the alleged assault


In court documents, Miss Alford said Mr Moore sought 'sexual favours in return for her continued employment, her ability to leave for lunch or take a longer lunch hour and her ability to take a vacation.

'For example, Alford testified that Moore gave her unsought gifts for which he demanded 'sucky-sucky.''

She testified that in September 2006, Mr Moore grabbed her by her ponytail, unzipped his trousers, pulled her head back and hit her in the head with his penis.

The papers continued: 'On October 12, 2006, Moore again grabbed Alford, pulled her head against his pants, pulled out his penis and hit her on the head with it.'

In a second attack that day, he was said to have held her down, lifted her shirt and masturbated until he ejaculated on her.

Mr Moore's semen and DNA were later found on paper towels collected by the police.

article-0-0C80552800000578-727_468x286.jpg

Huge: Aaron's, the Atlanta-based rent-to-own company, is fighting a record compensation award of $95 million


Despite the massive $95 million award, it is understood a federal cap on harassment damages will limit the total to around $41.6 million.

The court heard how Miss Alford called an internal harassment hotline in May 2006 to report the alleged abuse, but said the complaint was never properly followed up.

She added that at some point after the call she was approached by Mr Moore's supervisor, who confronted her in front supervisor Mr Moore.

Mr Moore's boss was then said to have told him to 'watch his back' because of the complaint.

Miss Alford claims that after the confrontation she was denied a promotion for complaining about the alleged assault.

article-0-0C804F3300000578-617_468x286.jpg

Size: Despite the size of the award, it is expected to be capped to $45 million


In deciding the damages, jurors were told that the company was worth $980 million and made $118 million last year in profit.

The Atlanta based company has 1,800 stores nationwide and employs more than 10,000 people.

The company found Aaron's liable for negligent supervision, sexual harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The suit was originally filed by the U.S. government Equal Employment opportunity Comission in 2008, before Miss Alford's lawyers took over the case.

Judy Cates, the lawyer who originally filed the suit, said after the decision: 'This company has always denied responsibility and continues to deny its responsibility to its workers.'

She added the jury: 'Wanted to send a message to Aaron's to change the culture and environment for their employees.'

Chad Strickland, vice president of associate resources at Aaron's said: 'Aaron's is extremely disappointed with the jury's verdict and believes that the award does not accurately reflect the evidence that was presented in this case.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ngle-sex-case-award-Aarons.html#ixzz1OtQr4YDt
 
wtf ! hit her on the head with his penis !!! lol !
 
The caption to the second pic is confusing.

It says "Happier (past tense) times" but then says the pic is from 3 years after the attack.

It also calls her Mrs. Alford but in the rest of the article she's called Miss Alford.

WHAT KIND OF SHITTY REPORTING IS THIS?!?!?!?!?

:cool:
 
The caption to the second pic is confusing.

It says "Happier (past tense) times" but then says the pic is from 3 years after the attack.

It also calls her Mrs. Alford but in the rest of the article she's called Miss Alford.

WHAT KIND OF SHITTY REPORTING IS THIS?!?!?!?!?

:cool:

Maybe she got 'happier' after leaving that job but has become unhappy again during the recent trial, and maybe she was married at the time of that pic so was Mrs but now unmarried so Miss. Or could just be shitty reporting :dunno:


I'm going with shitty reporting.

It is a UK newspaper, after all.

:cool:
Bear in mind it's not in the same league as The Guardian or The Times etc


WTF? Smells fishy to me.
Was thinking the same thing. Other than his DNA on some paper towels it was her word against his. I'd want to see the whole event captured in HD on CCTV before awarding those sorts of figures.
 

Ike Stain

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
This Richard Moore character sounds like a perfect candidate for a hit reality TV show!
 
Maybe she got 'happier' after leaving that job but has become unhappy again during the recent trial, and maybe she was married at the time of that pic so was Mrs but now unmarried so Miss. Or could just be shitty reporting :dunno:

I'm going with shitty reporting.

It is a UK newspaper, after all.

:cool:
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
$95 million for a teabag!? :surprise: :facepalm:

The McDonald's girl didn't even get that much and she deserved more.

At least she didn't dress like a pervert faerie that wanted it. :tongue:
 
Not much evidence to back this up by the sounds of it, but if it's true what a fucking douche.
 
The caption to the second pic is confusing.

It says "Happier (past tense) times" but then says the pic is from 3 years after the attack.

It also calls her Mrs. Alford but in the rest of the article she's called Miss Alford.

WHAT KIND OF SHITTY REPORTING IS THIS?!?!?!?!?

:cool:

It looks like they fudged facts in order to justify posting a "slutty" picture of her.

If the guy did what she claims, he should go to jail and the woman should get some financial compensation for her grief and whatever damages she accrued after her employment ceased, but that's fucking ridiculous. This country's retarded and getting more retarded every day.

I'm sure there will be an appeal and the amount awarded will be drastically reduced. There are people who are crippled for life by negligence and they get a fraction of what this woman got.
 
There is so much bull in this story I can smell the stench of cow pasture somehow through my computer.

If the facts (the ones I read) are true, the guy should be in jail for rape and sexual assault (they must not be true).

How often is someone going to get their head near enough to someone's crotch to where they are going to get smacked with the guy's doink without them having some complicity in the act?? Further, who sits there and let's another person wank over them??:confused::rolleyes:
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
By the sounds of it, she's lucky she didn't get raped. The man held her down against her will and jizzed on her. That not only violates her as an employee but a human being. So good for her, getting that kind of settlement. This kind of shit needs to stop.

If it were me though, I would have just taken a golf club to his nutsack and made sure he literally wouldn't be able to do this again lol.
 
Sounds like BS to me.

I don't' know the laws their going by but if you forcibly hold someone down, look under or remove clothing and ejaculate on them wouldn't that still be considered a form of rape? Meaning he would be facing jail-time and there wouldn't be a lawsuit per-se?
 

Jon S.

Banned
Bill Clinton was schlubbing at Aarons?:dunno:


But seriously:

The papers continued: 'On October 12, 2006, Moore again grabbed Alford, pulled her head against his pants, pulled out his penis and hit her on the head with it.'

In a second attack that day, he was said to have held her down, lifted her shirt and masturbated until he ejaculated on her.

WTF!?!?!? Who the fuck in their right mind would have stuck around after the 1st attack that day for another attack to occur? And all of this took place after a similar attack in September of the same year? :dunno: Yeah right!!! That makes absolutely no sense at all! Sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me. Furthermore, how the fuck would all of this shit take place without any of the other employees seeing any of it!?!?!? Yeah....I believe this story! My take on it is that he (the manager) probably did make some inappropriate comments and/or advancements, which though unacceptable, were tolerable. But in an effort to REALLY get paid, she decided to embelish significantly! NOBODY in their right mind would have stuck around a work place in that environment...where you were actually getting physically assaulted. Makes no sense at all!:2 cents:

Bottom line, this simply does not pass the smell test.
 
Bill Clinton was schlubbing at Aarons?:dunno:


But seriously:



WTF!?!?!? Who the fuck in their right mind would have stuck around after the 1st attack that day for another attack to occur? And all of this took place after a similar attack in September of the same year? :dunno: Yeah right!!! That makes absolutely no sense at all! Sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me. Furthermore, how the fuck would all of this shit take place without any of the other employees seeing any of it!?!?!? Yeah....I believe this story! My take on it is that he (the manager) probably did make some inappropriate comments and/or advancements, which though unacceptable, were tolerable. But in an effort to REALLY get paid, she decided to embelish significantly! NOBODY in their right mind would have stuck around a work place in that environment...where you were actually getting physically assaulted. Makes no sense at all!:2 cents:

Bottom line, this simply does not pass the smell test.

It's BS alright....true story;

I once worked of a company years ago...The married president of the company was fucking around with his secretary (not a small company either..at all).

In this order; the president of the company was relieved of this duties by the board...the president subsequently separated from his wife and moved in with the secretary. The secretary filed a sex harass suit against the company using the affair with the president as the basis. The company settled with the secretary then her and the former president live happily ever after (as far as I know).

As I understand it the company's position was that it was better to settle than spend money and embarrassment on a trial.:facepalm:

Point is....there is no way this chick is laying there getting jizzed on unless she was fucking the guy all along. And there's no way the guy is smacking her about the noggin out of the blue unless he's a sociopath sicko..OR unless he understood (from her) it was ok.
 

Kingfisher

Here Zombie, Zombie, Zombie...
Hit on the head by his junk? That was just the starter for her weekend...
That's not only excessive, but retarded.
 
It's BS alright....true story;

I once worked of a company years ago...The married president of the company was fucking around with his secretary (not a small company either..at all).

In this order; the president of the company was relieved of this duties by the board...the president subsequently separated from his wife and moved in with the secretary. The secretary filed a sex harass suit against the company using the affair with the president as the basis. The company settled with the secretary then her and the former president live happily ever after (as far as I know).

As I understand it the company's position was that it was better to settle than spend money and embarrassment on a trial.:facepalm:

Point is....there is no way this chick is laying there getting jizzed on unless she was fucking the guy all along. And there's no way the guy is smacking her about the noggin out of the blue unless he's a sociopath sicko..OR unless he understood (from her) it was ok.

Agreed.

*Sidebar- That chick is hot. :dunno:
 
Top