• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Will you still watched porn scene with condom in it?

Will You Still Watched Porn Scenes With Condom

  • Yes,

    Votes: 36 70.6%
  • No

    Votes: 12 23.5%
  • Not Sure Yet

    Votes: 3 5.9%

  • Total voters
    51
This is not a huge secret that many young men are imitating things they see in porn. By combining this subject with another kissing thread subject. Do you think that young men would grow up to be better lovers and value usage of condoms more if they showed more kissing and made using of condoms look more sexy and normal in porn? It doesn't really help much either that women are screaming like firealarm before male actor has even gotten his pants off to build all kind of illusions to young minds.



...just came from sauna while ago. Think we could all go to some public sauna, all naked of course like normally. Then have anders do some sexy poses in the middle and see whose blood stats to gather downwards. I'm pretty confident on myself having seen more than enough naked males from close range, yet never gotten it hard from that even by accident... What about the rest? (here little song fitting to situation, you probably won't understand anything, but after halfway you should understand at least most relevant part... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66gOc8cRz3c)

Since here has also been these cuckolding subjects around. Do you people think that we can thank majority of any kind of porn from huge amount of cuckolding sissy boys nowadays? I mean, when you watch porn, do you see yourself as 3rd person like inferior cameraman watching the scene of alpha male fucking from safe distance or do you prefer to imagine yourself being that male actor and nailing that woman by yourself instead? Pretty much all porn you could possibly watch has this cuckolding nature. Watching porn is about watching another male fucking another woman, like cuckolding person watching his wife being fucked by another man. Near the end of the movie people are even watching these facials, creampies, watching some other males jizzing your wife. Does it make you want to lick that cum off or does it turn you off? Where are you watching? Is porn building cuckolds from the very beginning, making people used to this 3rd party position?

I don't watch love making porn, if I wanted to watch slow love making I would watch that garbage that comes on network cable after 11 o'clock.
 
I will still watch it, I'm not a huge fan of condom porn and would much rather the guy wasnt wearing one, but the safety of the performers has to come first (no pun intended)
 
Maybe, but I will be irritated in scenes where the use of condoms makes no sense in context. It would be like watching a movie where a fight scene goes down, but the law prohibited the stunt men from actually touching each other for safety reasons. It would end up being a pretty crappy unrealistic scene.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
I don't get why its a huge issue. I mean I understand why men don't like seeing it, but like I've said before- if construction workers have to wear hardhats, police officers have to wear bullet-proof vests, football and hockey players have to wear protective gear and doctors get rubber gloves, then pornstars should wear condoms. STD's ARE a workplace hazard, any way you look at it. Its twice is scary, because people who film porn also have sex in their personal lives, and can pass it along if they're unaware of what they may have.

Yes I get that the general public has a higher STD rate than porn performers, but we're talking strictly workplace sex here. Protection is important. Saving lives is important. More important than whats visually more appealing.
 
Saving lives is important. More important than whats visually more appealing.

Wearing a hardhat in no way effects the end product. What the consumer buys it's the same regardless if a hard hat was worn while wearing it. It's a bad analogy. While I might not have a problem with it in a lot of incidences myself I also have to admit that wearing a condom makes creating certain type of material IMPOSSIBE. That's not the case with things like hard hats and steel toes shoes so it's not the same thing.

Then again...playing devil's advocate I could say taking that line of thought to it's logical conclusion society might as well just ban pretty much every major sport and a gigantic amount of movie and television shows. If we were honest with ourselves and really had the courage of our convictions, IF, that's what we really believed we would do that. If safety was really our number one and most important concern they wouldn't exist in the first place. Anybody that has every watched one of them and enjoyed it found that the visual appeal of it was more important than the safety of the people that watched it. Those people enjoyed others putting themselves in harms way. That might be a harsh way of putting it but it's the truth and reality no matter how many people don't want to admit that

How many hockey, boxers, football players, racecar drivers, MMA fighters, and stuntmen have long term or permanent conditions that are very serious all done in the name of visual appeal, for entertainment? The conclusion is that safety isn't the most important thing in society and that's not necessarily wrong if non-mentally challenged adults have informed consent when they willingly take the risk. That's a part of life.

Do I look badly upon people that don't want to see condoms in porn. No, I guess I don't. Not any more than I look badly upon people that like to watch sports where the athletes face dramatically increased rates of chronic brain damage and joints that will no longer work right before they reach middle age because they collided with each other hard countless times.
 

larss

I'm watching some specialist videos
I have no problem with seeing condoms in porn and have often felt that they should be - not just for the performers health but also because condoms should be the norm for casual sex anyway.
Given that most porn is fantasy casual sex, it seems that the wearing of condoms should be made to be seen as second nature.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
Wearing a hardhat in no way effects the end product. What the consumer buys it's the same regardless if a hard hat was worn while wearing it. It's a bad analogy. While I might not have a problem with it in a lot of incidences myself I also have to admit that wearing a condom makes creating certain type of material IMPOSSIBE. That's not the case with things like hard hats and steel toes shoes so it's not the same thing.

Then again...playing devil's advocate I could say taking that line of thought to it's logical conclusion society might as well just ban pretty much every major sport and a gigantic amount of movie and television shows. If we were honest with ourselves and really had the courage of our convictions, IF, that's what we really believed we would do that. If safety was really our number one and most important concern they wouldn't exist in the first place. Anybody that has every watched one of them and enjoyed it found that the visual appeal of it was more important than the safety of the people that watched it. Those people enjoyed others putting themselves in harms way. That might be a harsh way of putting it but it's the truth and reality no matter how many people don't want to admit that

How many hockey, boxers, football players, racecar drivers, MMA fighters, and stuntmen have long term or permanent conditions that are very serious all done in the name of visual appeal, for entertainment? The conclusion is that safety isn't the most important thing in society and that's not necessarily wrong if non-mentally challenged adults have informed consent when they willingly take the risk. That's a part of life.

Do I look badly upon people that don't want to see condoms in porn. No, I guess I don't. Not any more than I look badly upon people that like to watch sports where the athletes face dramatically increased rates of chronic brain damage and joints that will no longer work right before they reach middle age because they collided with each other hard countless times.

Yes but an athlete sustaining injuries due to his decisions affects him ONLY. His decision, his consequences. But when a performer has sex at work, unprotected, he/she runs the risk of spreading disease to others who aren't in the industry. And those people can spread it to others. And so on and so forth. One persons decisions to not wrap it has the potential to physically harm countless others. And with the rate of STD's now, it just seems smart to enforce it. For the record, I wish there was a way to enforce everyone who engages in casual sex to wrap it up. I think its our duty, as sexually active adults, to make the right decisions regarding sexual health.
 
Yes but an athlete sustaining injuries due to his decisions affects him ONLY. His decision, his consequences. But when a performer has sex at work, unprotected, he/she runs the risk of spreading disease to others who aren't in the industry. And those people can spread it to others. And so on and so forth. One persons decisions to not wrap it has the potential to physically harm countless others. And with the rate of STD's now, it just seems smart to enforce it. For the record, I wish there was a way to enforce everyone who engages in casual sex to wrap it up. I think its our duty, as sexually active adults, to make the right decisions regarding sexual health.

I could maybe buy that rationale if we were talking about some contagious airborne plague going around that people couldn't reasonably avoid, but we aren't. Outside of vary rare and hard to transmit accidental non-sexual blood transmissions most of those other people that get infected are going to do so because they themselves are doing foolish things and willingly putting themselves at risk. It's not the government's job any more to protect those people from themselves than somebody like say an athlete that puts their body on the line.

Further, considering the general population is pretty sexually active as it is and that the performers in porn constitute an incredibly small portion of the overall population the adult performers' contribution to the outbreak of diseases overall is pretty small. The state or country would logically be better off just creating a law saying every single person is not allowed anymore than one or two different sexual partners in a year. They would at least then be intellectually honest and do something that might have a slight hope of cutting out STD transmissions. Outside of that or a cure to all sexually transmitted diseases nothing is going to be effective in a practical sense of stemming STD transmission as a whole. Of course that law would be ridiculous and nobody would go for it, but it's about as ridiculous as enforcing condoms in porn and still more logical if that is really there goal and not just to do something to go after porn in the flimsy guise of public safety.
 
I watch hardcore porn to see the woman being pleased and penetrated. A condom doesn't change the penetration any. I've never stopped to care either way.
 
You will see more condoms in porn. After this week, I have seen several bigger names announce on Twitter that they will be condom only from now on. More companies will willingly start to use them.
The problem of STD testing and other controls in the industry is the fact that people still have intercourse and oral sex outside of the industry. That will always be a continuing issue, unless all stars and starlets agree not to have sex outside of the industry, or with any other than a single, monogamous partner outside of the industry.

I neither need nor expect a starlet who has many partners to have unprotected sex. Use of protection should be left up to the consent of the star and starlet, with any one person in the scene having "veto power" (to require all men in the scene to wear them).

Yes, I love unrestricted, unprotected sex too. But I prefer that in the context of monogamous relationships. And there are plenty of monogamous couples who only have sex with one another to enjoy that. I know I'm seemingly in the minority among men who enjoy monogamous couples in pornography, and have no need to see a woman taken by more than one man in her career. I'm not focusing on the man at all, only how he is pleasing her.
 

Maggie Green

Official Checked Star Member
You will occasionally see them used on sex toys as it's cost prohibitive to buy new ones every time you shoot a new vid with a different person.

I've shot my fair share of lesbian porn and I have never seen a condom put on a dildo. I always bring my own toys to set and the other girls I know do as well.
 
Top