Why the fuck would you ever get married?

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
and to me- isn't thinking about cheating with another woman, just as bad as actually doing it?

Not unless you're thinking about it ALL the time. Then I'd say your thoughts are going to soon turn into actions.

I doubt many people would see thoughts or fantasies as cheating. Maybe some strictly religious people would refer to lust as a sin, but it's still different than actually cheating... even to them.
 
What is it with this "bad/wrong" thing? And why are people so focused on "cheating"?

and to me- isn't thinking about cheating with another woman, just as bad as actually doing it?
This is what I don't understand. Not trying to single you out, and I think you're showing some of the most insight.

But to me, I think the problem is that we focus on "bad" and "wrong" instead of "right." We focus on "cheating" instead of "enjoying." Why is that?

If you're focused on other things than what is "right" with your marriage and what you "enjoy" with your marriage, then you really shouldn't be married to your spouse. Honestly. Might as well be honest about it.

Don't give a fuck about the divorce rate. There is no "award" for being married only once. There is no "award" for being married the fewest times. People change. People make mistakes. And other people aren't always honest, especially with themselves. I'm honest with my wife, and she is honest with me.

Now with that all said ...

Can another woman than my wife get me hard? Yes. I think I've stated enough evidence on this board to more than qualify that. Do I ever think about "cheating" on my wife? I could answer that question directly, but instead, all answer it indirectly. Let's go beyond the fact that I'm not on this board when I'm not traveling away from my wife (when I'm with her, I just want to be with her). Why do I deny myself opportunities while on the road, especially with the "lesser appreciated beauty" I go for (not that I'm much of a catch)?

My wife is the ultimate lay. She was when I first married her, she was the ultimate anticipation when I first met her, and now 15 years into being with her, that lust -- and I mean lust -- has only gotten stronger. I lust for her gaze. I lust for her curves. I lust to be inside of her in every way. I lust to be one with her. I still unload inside of her like it's my first time, taboo and everything else. I crave it!

Let's even take away, for a moment, the fact that my wife and I love -- not just prefer, but love -- having a monogamous relationship. If she said I could sleep with another woman, would I? Not "cheating," with full approval. Would I? Here's the deal, no. I am not going to ever feel as comfortable and content as I do with my wife. No woman is ever going to give me pleasure as much as my wife. Furthermore, I'm not into "cliches" like "why have hamburger when you have steak at home," my wife is just the ultimate, and I want the ultimate.

Now let's flip this. What if my wife wanted another man? I love her enough to let her have another man. If she came to me and told me why, I want to make her happy. In fact, I could find a way to enjoy another man making love to her with myself. Why? Because seeing the most beautiful woman in the world lusted after can be sexy, as long as you let go of the "property" and other non-sense. Spouses aren't property, they are partners, and what your partner values is what you value.

That is marriage, at least as I define it for myself.

You want to look at porn when married? Tell her beforehand! You want to have an open relationship? Tell her beforehand! You want to have "guys nights out"? Tell her beforehand! You don't want the BJs to stop after marriage? Tell her beforehand! Tell her all you want once you get married, no matter how selfish you think it is, she needs to know all your desires!

There are no "absolute values" in relationships. There are the values of the partners, which they vow to accept when they marry. Hell, there's nothing wrong with multiple partner relationships, except the difficulty in trying to get 3+ people to agree on all the same values. It's all relative, but it requires honesty and maturity to work.

And that means you can't be a hypocrite with one-way values purposely built on denial instead of sharing. You can't lust for relationships with other women while coveting your marriage and never letting your spouse even look at another man, that's clearly a "property" view. It's one thing if you agree to have such an one-way setup -- you can sleep with other women and she does not sleep with other men, if that's what she wants (and might even want to enjoy the women with). But it's about values that actually conflict and are in hypocrisy. Where you find pleasure and you deny her the same. It has to be about an arrangement of mutual pleasure.

Instead, what a lot of relationships seem to be horribly built-on is hiding things. I really don't care to call it "cheating" because it totally misses the point, let alone conjures ideals of "absolute rights/wrongs." A lot of people really get off on the hiding of it, the cheating aspect, the wrongness, and that's where the very issue and foundation of marriage in "honesty" breaks down. It's not the alleged "cheating" that is difficult to get over, but the lack of honesty, the question of if your spouse enjoys hiding things from you, etc... Too many people don't realize that until it happens, especially the person who did so!

Likewise, a lot of people excuse sleeping with another woman on not having sex. In all honesty, it means there's a communication issue. If you communicated that sex was important to you before marriage, you must communicate how she's not living up to her agreement. Sleeping with another woman is not the way to do it, because it wrongly involves another person into your value partnership. Masterbation? Yes, that's one way. Porn? Yes, that's another, although I wouldn't recommend Porn if you knew before you married her that she had a real problem with it (you accepted those values of hers). There are still only two people involved in these cases.

And don't let anyone tell you that "oh, sex is secondary," because if it's not "secondary" in your view, then it's not, period, no one can answer for you or your relationship. Sex is very important, at long as at least one person is functional. Unless, of course, you communicated it wasn't important before you married. I know there are a lot of dishonest women out there who give BJs before marriage, and then stop after getting married. Understand they are fools who should communicate their lack of interest beforehand, and are only setting themselves up for expectations.

And most important, marriage should never be considered a "responsibility that cannot end." Yes, marriage is a responsibility. But it's not one that cannot end. People can and should choose to end relationships when they are not working out. It's more difficult with kids, because that's a third party that's now involved, likely the most important party. Ending marriage should be about finding compatibility, especially the compatibility of not living with each other. If you're having a strong "hate" aspect in a relationship, if you have kids, divorcing to escape it may not make much difference in how much your kids are fucked up as a result of those lessons. Learning to deal with someone is sometimes the better path to choose, especially if you've taken on such responsibilities.

Although some people just aren't understanding in the least bit, and there's no much that can be said for them. They may not find any compatibility and contentness ever in their life. Avoid such people, period.
 
No it's not well put.

You can have happiness and love and she [or he] can be your heart and soul blah blah blah... without being married. And to say that you need to be married to find true love and inner peace, ect, well, don't talk rot.

i hope you don't take offence to this question, but have you found inner pearce in true love and blah blah blah? i really am asking


i don't believe marriage is the admission of true love or the magical accepting of inner peace . i believe it is the revelation that the other person and you have formed true love and wish to commit to each other in order to continue sharing that special bond. it's nothing more than a promise to stay together for all your love is worth. that is why marriages differ in lengths and circumstances. all marriages are not equal, much like the differences in people the differences in relationships also exist.:2 cents:
 
Re: What is it with this "bad/wrong" thing? And why are people so focused on "cheati

This is what I don't understand. Not trying to single you out, and I think you're showing some of the most insight.

But to me, I think the problem is that we focus on "bad" and "wrong" instead of "right." We focus on "cheating" instead of "enjoying." Why is that?

If you're focused on other things than what is "right" with your marriage and what you "enjoy" with your marriage, then you really shouldn't be married to your spouse. Honestly. Might as well be honest about it.

Don't give a fuck about the divorce rate. There is no "award" for being married only once. There is no "award" for being married the fewest times. People change. People make mistakes. And other people aren't always honest, especially with themselves. I'm honest with my wife, and she is honest with me.

Now with that all said ...

Can another woman than my wife get me hard? Yes. I think I've stated enough evidence on this board to more than qualify that. Do I ever think about "cheating" on my wife? I could answer that question directly, but instead, all answer it indirectly. Let's go beyond the fact that I'm not on this board when I'm not traveling away from my wife (when I'm with her, I just want to be with her). Why do I deny myself opportunities while on the road, especially with the "lesser appreciated beauty" I go for (not that I'm much of a catch)?

My wife is the ultimate lay. She was when I first married her, she was the ultimate anticipation when I first met her, and now 15 years into being with her, that lust -- and I mean lust -- has only gotten stronger. I lust for her gaze. I lust for her curves. I lust to be inside of her in every way. I lust to be one with her. I still unload inside of her like it's my first time, taboo and everything else. I crave it!

Let's even take away, for a moment, the fact that my wife and I love -- not just prefer, but love -- having a monogamous relationship. If she said I could sleep with another woman, would I? Not "cheating," with full approval. Would I? Here's the deal, no. I am not going to ever feel as comfortable and content as I do with my wife. No woman is ever going to give me pleasure as much as my wife. Furthermore, I'm not into "cliches" like "why have hamburger when you have steak at home," my wife is just the ultimate, and I want the ultimate.

Now let's flip this. What if my wife wanted another man? I love her enough to let her have another man. If she came to me and told me why, I want to make her happy. In fact, I could find a way to enjoy another man making love to her with myself. Why? Because seeing the most beautiful woman in the world lusted after can be sexy, as long as you let go of the "property" and other non-sense. Spouses aren't property, they are partners, and what your partner values is what you value.

That is marriage, at least as I define it for myself.

You want to look at porn when married? Tell her beforehand! You want to have an open relationship? Tell her beforehand! You want to have "guys nights out"? Tell her beforehand! You don't want the BJs to stop after marriage? Tell her beforehand! Tell her all you want once you get married, no matter how selfish you think it is, she needs to know all your desires!

There are no "absolute values" in relationships. There are the values of the partners, which they vow to accept when they marry. Hell, there's nothing wrong with multiple partner relationships, except the difficulty in trying to get 3+ people to agree on all the same values. It's all relative, but it requires honesty and maturity to work.

And that means you can't be a hypocrite with one-way values purposely built on denial instead of sharing. You can't lust for relationships with other women while coveting your marriage and never letting your spouse even look at another man, that's clearly a "property" view. It's one thing if you agree to have such an one-way setup -- you can sleep with other women and she does not sleep with other men, if that's what she wants (and might even want to enjoy the women with). But it's about values that actually conflict and are in hypocrisy. Where you find pleasure and you deny her the same. It has to be about an arrangement of mutual pleasure.

Instead, what a lot of relationships seem to be horribly built-on is hiding things. I really don't care to call it "cheating" because it totally misses the point, let alone conjures ideals of "absolute rights/wrongs." A lot of people really get off on the hiding of it, the cheating aspect, the wrongness, and that's where the very issue and foundation of marriage in "honesty" breaks down. It's not the alleged "cheating" that is difficult to get over, but the lack of honesty, the question of if your spouse enjoys hiding things from you, etc... Too many people don't realize that until it happens, especially the person who did so!

Likewise, a lot of people excuse sleeping with another woman on not having sex. In all honesty, it means there's a communication issue. If you communicated that sex was important to you before marriage, you must communicate how she's not living up to her agreement. Sleeping with another woman is not the way to do it, because it wrongly involves another person into your value partnership. Masterbation? Yes, that's one way. Porn? Yes, that's another, although I wouldn't recommend Porn if you knew before you married her that she had a real problem with it (you accepted those values of hers). There are still only two people involved in these cases.

And don't let anyone tell you that "oh, sex is secondary," because if it's not "secondary" in your view, then it's not, period, no one can answer for you or your relationship. Sex is very important, at long as at least one person is functional. Unless, of course, you communicated it wasn't important before you married. I know there are a lot of dishonest women out there who give BJs before marriage, and then stop after getting married. Understand they are fools who should communicate their lack of interest beforehand, and are only setting themselves up for expectations.

And most important, marriage should never be considered a "responsibility that cannot end." Yes, marriage is a responsibility. But it's not one that cannot end. People can and should choose to end relationships when they are not working out. It's more difficult with kids, because that's a third party that's now involved, likely the most important party. Ending marriage should be about finding compatibility, especially the compatibility of not living with each other. If you're having a strong "hate" aspect in a relationship, if you have kids, divorcing to escape it may not make much difference in how much your kids are fucked up as a result of those lessons. Learning to deal with someone is sometimes the better path to choose, especially if you've taken on such responsibilities.

Although some people just aren't understanding in the least bit, and there's no much that can be said for them. They may not find any compatibility and contentness ever in their life. Avoid such people, period.

Allot of richness in this post. Quite excellent in many respects..However, I don't think I would have an interest generally in my wife experiencing sex outside of our marriage.

I'm not jealous at all and I don't think my perspective would be the product of a jealous emotion.

Sex is just sex to me, until it involves marriage....then it's something else I believe.

It ought to be special I think. I respect the decisions of others who have a different perspective on this as I'm pro choice on their choices.

You say there are people who are not "understanding", I would tend to characterize those people for the purposes of this subject as selfish me-firsters lacking the patience and dedication for anything that requires sharing.
 
I have never been married or in a relationship. I have been stabbed in the back so many times by people that I thought I could trust that it makes it hard for me to trust another human being. I own my own house and plan to pay off the mortgage by the time I am 40. Seems like a realistic goal for me. Marriage is too risky, I don't want to risk loosing my house when the marriage falls apart.

I do like the idea of marriage of two people that love each other tieing the knot and having children and growing old together. Marriage is the right thing to do if you want to have a family. For me it is way to risky and I have had alot of bad experience in dealing with people so thats why I will probably remain single all my life.
 
i have never been married or in a relationship. I have been stabbed in the back so many times by people that i thought i could trust that it makes it hard for me to trust another human being. I own my own house and plan to pay off the mortgage by the time i am 40. Seems like a realistic goal for me. Marriage is too risky, i don't want to risk loosing my house when the marriage falls apart.

I do like the idea of marriage of two people that love each other tieing the knot and having children and growing old together. Marriage is the right thing to do if you want to have a family. For me it is way to risky and i have had alot of bad experience in dealing with people so thats why i will probably remain single all my life.
when?!?
 
Re: What is it with this "bad/wrong" thing? And why are people so focused on "cheati

However, I don't think I would have an interest generally in my wife experiencing sex outside of our marriage. I'm not jealous at all and I don't think my perspective would be the product of a jealous emotion.
I didn't mean to suggest those who wouldn't share their wife are such. I just meant that in my case, I'm at the point that I'm willing if she ever asks. So far, she says she only wants me, and that's more than fine as well. ;)

You say there are people who are not "understanding", I would tend to characterize those people for the purposes of this subject as selfish me-firsters lacking the patience and dedication for anything that requires sharing.
The thing is that one can be "selfish" in a relationship, as long as those "selfish" desires are compatible with the values of your lover. When they aren't, that's a problem, especially when people are selfish enough to keep it hidden from their lover.

In the end, marriage is something people should only do when they find someone compatible with their values. At the same time, people do change over time, and values sometimes change. People have to have a relationship built on honesty and trust, and try to work through them. For those that cannot, divorce is not a "nasty word," it's sometimes necessary.

Although anyone who can't seem to work out things with their spouse, then divorce, and still have problems communicating should really, really not have kids. Unfortunately, many of them already do. And it's sad that they cannot get past their hurt and recognize their kids should never be exposed to it.
 
No it's not well put.

You can have happiness and love and she [or he] can be your heart and soul blah blah blah... without being married. And to say that you need to be married to find true love and inner peace, ect, well, don't talk rot.

Not really in my view.It's about being committed to a relationship.The only way society recognises this commitment is through marriage, that's why it's been a stabilising thing until recently.People who think it's unnecessary to show this commitment (by avoiding the formality) are probably lacking just that little commitment themselves.Otherwise why not stand in front of your peers and declare it , which is what it's all about.
It's a bit like driving , you can tell yourself you are a good driver but you need to pass your test to prove it.Believe me, being married to someone isn't the same as cohabitation.
 

Alyssa Rose

Official Checked Star Member
Oh boy....
Bitter much? :p

Here goes...

Damn....I'm starting to hate this thread since so many young people here seem to be anti-marriage.

:wave2:I'm a young person that is definitely PRO marriage :D

Dual income, so you can have BMW's and Porsche's...

:confused: Wait wait wait! Im married, where the heck is my porsche??

I heard the divorce rate in America is 67%. Most people still think it's only 50%. Either way, that's pretty steep and Americans should consider that when getting married.

Why is that? I mean are you saying that your like 'everyone else'? That would be like saying, 67% of people eat chocolate ice cream so next time you go to baskin robbins you should consider that before ordering your usual strawberry... Just because other people can't grasp what marriage means why shouldn't we?

I don't understand it- the happy people chiming in must not be 'satisfied' because the only reason you would sign in to Freeones is to jack off to free porn.

Uhmm... I dont have the right parts to :rubbel: soooo there goes that theory :p Im on freeones because it makes for interesting conversation and for threads like this.


Marrige really is for having children. I mean thats what its really all about right

Oh, so women who are infertile and men who are sterile shouldnt get married right? I mean since theres no point..:confused:

and to me- isn't thinking about cheating with another woman, just as bad as actually doing it?

Everyone at some point sees someone that is undeniably attractive and fantasizes about what it might be like to be with that person. I agree with feller, if I see a pair of shoes I want that I think about taking, but dont, does that make me a theif? I see attractive men all the time, would I ever be with another man? No. I am so turned on by my husband its unreal, the way he touches me the things he whispers in my ear, the way he knows exactly what I like, No other man could compare, doesnt mean I don't like a little bit of eye candy every once in a while, its harmless.


Alright now lets tackle the subject of divorce shall we?

The divorce rates are as high as they are now a days not because of 'unhappy people' but because of 48 hour stunts (ie:Britney Spears in Vegas anybody?) and because quite frankly, people get divorced for the dumbest reasons these days. "He wore that orange shirt I hate, guess we're gettin divorced", "he called me a bitch because I was PMSing and destroyed his 1000$ baseball card collection, get the divorce papers ready" Or my favorite is when people claim "irreconcilable differences" Really? I mean come on now, did you forget that when you married it was for better and for worse? Not just better? Sickness AND health, Wealthy AND poor... You get through all those irreconcilable differences, and you do it together. Marriage doesn't mean perfection, by any means, but if you love each other, you can get through anything. & though im a woman I do believe that probably about 75% of divorces happen because of women. We sometimes act completely bitchy and crazy and then blame the man... (Now thats not to say that men arent really clueless and retarted sometimes cuz uhm they definitely are :p)

:2 cents:
 

habo9

Banned
The only reason I would get married for , is if the woman was extremely rich & on her death bed :tongue:
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
LOL..what's the point of getting married? I'm pretty sure everyone here had sex prior to getting married.

Tammy

He just wants to pull an "Anna Nicole" on her: marry an old, sick, rich woman and hope for a quick death. Clearly, any woman would be lucky to hook up with him. :rofl:
 

habo9

Banned
He just wants to pull an "Anna Nicole" on her: marry an old, sick, rich woman and hope for a quick death. Clearly, any woman would be lucky to hook up with him. :rofl:

You said it , any woman would be lucky to hook up with me thanks :nanner:
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Preach it, brutha... preach it! :D
 
Actually, losing your intercourse virginity on your honeymoon ...

LOL..what's the point of getting married? I'm pretty sure everyone here had sex prior to getting married.
Sex, yes. Intercourse, no. So if you define sex as only intercourse, and not ejaculation elsewhere, then some of us married as virgins, or close to it. I would have been an intercourse virgin had it not been for one, stupid girlfriend who mounted me and took the load in seconds (not realizing I was an intercourse virgin).

But it was still close enough to feeling like losing my intercourse virginity on my honeymoon. I still visualize (and unload) to the memory of my wife riding my rod for the first time, and taking that load inside of her. I'll never forget it. Best fucking sex ever!
 
Re: Actually, losing your intercourse virginity on your honeymoon ...

Can someone please point me in the direction of the "soulmate" bar?The place where Ill meet the woman that will bring me true "inner peace".Like I said before,sounds nice,but highly unlikely.I really dont see myself getting married,but I know I want a child or two_One woman,one to two kids,then Im getting cut.I will be a good father and if things work out with the woman,great.If not,it will not affect how dedicated I will be to my children.Some say children out of wedlock is wrong,but what the fuck do they know.Marraige isnt some invisible forcefield that keeps people from lying,cheating and being bad mothers/fathers.Its up to the individual,being married has nothing to do with it.
 
I don't disagree ...

Can someone please point me in the direction of the "soulmate" bar?The place where Ill meet the woman that will bring me true "inner peace".
Don't know if it exists. God knows I just got fucking lucky with my wife. I had actually gotten sick of women not wanting to take on a relationship and just wanting to fuck prior. Yes, I kid you not! I had fun, but I had given up on finding such a woman.

Then I met my wife (to be). Everything changed.

Like I said before,sounds nice,but highly unlikely.I really dont see myself getting married,but I know I want a child or two_One woman,one to two kids,then Im getting cut.I will be a good father and if things work out with the woman,great.If not,it will not affect how dedicated I will be to my children.Some say children out of wedlock is wrong,but what the fuck do they know.
I don't think it's wrong at all. The only thing I will say is that people must be committed to raising that child. So the reason why most people view it as "wrong" to have a child out of wedlock is because they don't think people are committed to raising the child.

Given the fact that people have unintended kids out of wedlock, that's probably on-point, statistically. But if people are dedicated to having kids out of wedlock, then I agree, it's nothing different. And people who feel "trapped" in marriage by a kid are probably even worse.

Marraige isnt some invisible forcefield that keeps people from lying,cheating and being bad mothers/fathers.Its up to the individual,being married has nothing to do with it.
Agreed, utterly agreed. Again, it's about commitment. The problem is that people see a lot of unmarried people not committed having unintended off-spring. In the case of people who were already married and having an unintended child, at least they were committed in one way. Doesn't mean they are committed to raising the child, but they were often committed to each other.

If people are together and committed to each other, I agree, marriage doesn't matter.
 
I was engaged to a wonderful woman and she broke up with me. I was very much in love and would have done anything for her.

I've gotten over it and her. I'm happy as can be. I can understand why people would not want to get married. It seems like most relationships have a shelf life. Two, three, five years or so. There are the exceptions of course, but I agree, marriage should be looked at very closely before entering into it.
 
Re: Actually, losing your intercourse virginity on your honeymoon ...

Can someone please point me in the direction of the "soulmate" bar?The place where Ill meet the woman that will bring me true "inner peace".Like I said before,sounds nice,but highly unlikely.I really dont see myself getting married,but I know I want a child or two_One woman,one to two kids,then Im getting cut.I will be a good father and if things work out with the woman,great.If not,it will not affect how dedicated I will be to my children.Some say children out of wedlock is wrong,but what the fuck do they know.Marraige isnt some invisible forcefield that keeps people from lying,cheating and being bad mothers/fathers.Its up to the individual,being married has nothing to do with it.

There is no "soulmate" bar I know of that purports to be the meeting place of people destined to be together which is what I assume you mean with the question.

Marriage nor any relationship irrespective of how wonderful, is not magic. It takes work, understanding, trust and most importantly..the ability to tell yourself "no" at times. Most people believe they must or will find someone they are in absolute and perfect agreement with 100 pct. of the time. Hardly such a person exists as most people torn on issues, don't agree with themselves 100 pct. of the time.

There may be a modicum of destiny involved to the degree one believes in such a thing. However, if you go into it believing your marriage relationship is based solely on destiny it will more than likely fail as you will most definitely take for granted the dedication and sacrifice required to maintain it.

Hmmm, "destiny"? Could Michael Jordan have been anything else but the greatest basketball player in the eyes of many to ever player the game? Who knows. But for a time, he tried his best to be something else and not a basketball player. In his efforts to do so, did circumstance, perspective and opportunity conspire to meet in one place for him causing the effect of him ultimately becoming the great Michael Jordan? Shit! Isn't that destiny for lack of a better term?? But I'm struck by the phrase "destiny unfulfilled" which would appear to concepts at odds with each other...an oxymoron like "deafening silence". I mean, if it's "destiny" it's suppose to happen no matter what and by definition could never be "unfulfilled" right? No. "destiny unfulfilled" is a circumstance with a favor chance of success which has failed because it lacked the necessary dedication and sacrifice.

Are our relationships (good or bad) including failed marriages part of a larger growth process for us as individuals for which there is no right answer but simply, the process? A destiny? Well we know all marriages can be destined for many things including failure but one thing is for sure, we don't succeed or fail at anything unless we try.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Re: Actually, losing your intercourse virginity on your honeymoon ...

I really dont see myself getting married,but I know I want a child or two_One woman,one to two kids,then Im getting cut.I will be a good father and if things work out with the woman,great.If not,it will not affect how dedicated I will be to my children.

I see you're in the U.S. (California). So if you think you're going to have kids, not get along with their mother and still be able to maintain a healthy relationship with your kids, you have about as much chance of that happening as finding that "soulmate bar" you were asking about. Your dedication might end up being nothing more than that court ordered check you will send every month.

I'm not anti-marriage by any means. I think it's a good thing (for society, if not always for the individuals involved). I was engaged years ago, and it just didn't work out. Right now, marriage is just not something that I'm looking for. But if my primary objective was to have kids and be a father (who is in their lives daily), I would probably look to adopt by myself - or possibly inseminate a surrogate (which is still a bit dodgy, legally speaking). And then, if I later met a woman suitable for marriage, they would still stay with me if things didn't work out between us.

I almost wound up in court with my ex over who got to keep the cat that I adopted from a shelter (before I even met her!). So I'm not under any illusion that any man (not married to a crack ho or a heroin addict) is going to be getting primary custody of kids in the U.S. You'll get maybe a weekend/month, if she's in the mood to be at home when your weekend is due.
 
Top