• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Why is Got Gisele so popular?

I've always liked Leah xoxo but I think Gisele is just hotter, but Aria Giovanni is another story. :lovecoupl

The only solo/softcore models (I can think of) that I find nearly as hot are Renata Daninsky, Brianna Frost, Shay Loren and Cam with Carmen.

:bowdown:I think Alexa Loren is hotter.:lovecoupl

Leah's 100% natural too and her tits are truly amazing. But in a weird way, she's almost too perfect. It's hard to explain.

And, although I'm not the fan I used to be, when Aria Giovanni first burst on to the scene, I literally couldn't believe my eyes. She's still a knockout, but man, back in the day she was a force of nature.

I felt the same way about Katie Fey, only that's still yet to change. Last week I watch a 30 minute interview with her. In Ukrainian. I have no idea what the fuck she was saying and she was being interviewed by a drag queen, but I still couldn't budge my eyes. Very few models could inspire that kind of mindless gawking from me.

I think Sofi A from Met Art is the new addition to that list. Among a few others. And all of these girls are light years beyond Giselle IMHO. She's certainly no slouch, but I really don't understand all the hubbub, bub.
 
This thread makes me nervous, kinda. Be niiiiiice, people.

I agree w/Petra, different strokes for different folks. She's definitely pretty -- she's got that super-perfect all-American "Barbie" look goin' for her. And I'm assuming guys are more about her LOOKS than what she does since she's a solo model making it on a porn site. Don't deny it!

:hatsoff:

I gots to agree with that. To me she's just a pretty "Barbie" look model and that's it. :2 cents: I'm not much of a fan of the so called all-American "Barbie" look. I feel that's what the media is preaching to me rather than letting people make up their own minds. I wonder why? :crash:

Because of the same reason Justin Bieber and Avatar are popular: People are stupid as fuck. Must be the heat or pollution or an alien virus damaging their brains.

:rofl: :glugglug:

She's very pretty...GREAT tits but top to bottom she competes with Got Gisele???

Yes. The glamor world and FreeOnes is full of ladies just as pretty as GG and there are many in my opinion who are much more pleasing in all departments. It all depends on what you like or have been convinced (media) to like. :2 cents:

The only model I can see on her level from a pure head to toe....every body part beauty comparison is Veronica Zemanova.

Allot of other girls are very nice portraits. Got Gisele and Veronica Zemanova are not simply nice portraits...they are fucking Rembrandts.

WOW!! I think you are getting a bit carried away HM. :rofl:
It's just your opinion. It not a fact that can ever be proved, is it?

A PC is still much more popular than a Mac but that doesn't mean a PC is better, does it? :2 cents:
 
Yes. The glamor world and FreeOnes is full of ladies just as pretty as GG and there are many in my opinion who are much more pleasing in all departments. It all depends on what you like or have been convinced (media) to like. :2 cents:
More to the point I think people tend to look at different things....therein lies some of the reasoning for differences of opinions. Some people look at things more intricately than others. Some are more superficial in their analysis. If for example a person just looks at who they think is prettiest then naturally there are going to be more people that competition.
WOW!! I think you are getting a bit carried away HM. :rofl:
It's just your opinion. It not a fact that can ever be proved, is it?
I suppose your opinion of me getting carried away is a fact?:cool:
A PC is still much more popular than a Mac but that doesn't mean a PC is better, does it? :2 cents:

Depends on what criteria you're judging them on.
 
More to the point I think people tend to look at different things....therein lies some of the reasoning for differences of opinions. Some people look at things more intricately than others. Some are more superficial in their analysis. If for example a person just looks at who they think is prettiest then naturally there are going to be more people that competition.

Your reply is basically the same thing I said in your words. :2 cents:
So I guess we agree on this point, don't we?

I suppose your opinion of me getting carried away is a fact?:cool:

No I can't say it's a fact. As you correctly stated it's just my opinion based on 13 replies so far with more to cum. I don't really see the point but I hope you do keep posting in this thread as I'll have a good laugh reading them.

Plus I thought your comparison of GG with Rembrandt was a classic Hot Mega post. :1orglaugh

If you don't already work for GG's advertising/promotion team I think she should consider offering you a spot on her team. ;)

Depends on what criteria you're judging them on.

I think the results of any comparison will depend on what criteria you're judging them on. :2 cents:
 
Your reply is basically the same thing I said in your words. :2 cents:
So I guess we agree on this point, don't we?

In your eyes, the statement you make below and the one I make are equal in the point they convey?? Although you go on later to agree that it depends on the criteria, we're not saying the same things in the 2 statements below.

Yours conveys a simple matter of personal taste or outside influence. Mine says beyond simple personal tastes, the degree of criteria a person uses affects their comparisons of like things. For example, some see "enhanced" tits as a detraction irrespective of the quality or effect on a girl's appearance. Others don't draw a distinction between "enhanced" tits and natural tits as long as they look good.
Yes. The glamor world and FreeOnes is full of ladies just as pretty as GG and there are many in my opinion who are much more pleasing in all departments. It all depends on what you like or have been convinced (media) to like. :2 cents:

More to the point I think people tend to look at different things....therein lies some of the reasoning for differences of opinions. Some people look at things more intricately than others. Some are more superficial in their analysis. If for example a person just looks at who they think is prettiest then naturally there are going to be more people that competition.

Depends on what criteria you're judging them on.

No I can't say it's a fact. As you correctly stated it's just my opinion based on 13 replies so far with more to cum. I don't really see the point but I hope you do keep posting in this thread as I'll have a good laugh reading them.
I suppose the point of it is as lucid as every reply you've made in this thread beyond your basic point.:cool:
Plus I thought your comparison of GG with Rembrandt was a classic Hot Mega post.
You should re-read my response. I never compared her to Rembrandt but to Rembrandt's work.:2 cents: And I think you either missed the point of that post or read into it the wrong way.

But if you want to try and relate it to this thread...let's. The context of this thread is why is GG so popular (presumably) as compared to other models on FOs? If it's your suggestion that she is somehow more popularly advertised here beyond what's been done for others, where is the case for that? Further, when you look at the Miss FOs contest for example and her placing...among those who did promoted themselves (versus those who did no promoting) for the contest..she probably promoted herself the least. Yet she placed quite prominently (5th) and the only one of the 10 finalists who doesn't perform hard core. To what do you attribute that? Certainly some of it is her being a familiar OCSM here but if it were just about that she wouldn't have even made the top 50 IMO. As there are other, more familiar, possibly more "popular" OCSMs who didn't place in the top 50.
If you don't already work for GG's advertising/promotion team I think she should consider offering you a spot on her team. ;)
I'm disappointed. It took you this long to get to the proverbial vested interest response.:crying: Besides, if I can't even convince someone like you, how accomplished can I actually be at it?:tongue:

But why would someone with a vested interest in promoting GG create a thread seeking to find others as good or better?
I think the results of any comparison will depend on what criteria you're judging them on. :2 cents:

Really??:rolleyes: I suppose that would have been the point of me suggesting how superficially one person may look at something as compared to how intricately another may.
 

joal0503

Closed Account
marketing strategy camwithher...

she got money...and big boobs...shes hot...christ whats the point of this thread?
 

larss

I'm watching some specialist videos
I like her. She interacts on this board, is beautiful and has a great body. Her friend and colleague Violet is also eye-popingly gorgeous.

Amy Reid I have never got. That she has a fantastic body, cannot be denied, but I don't find her very attractive.
 
In your eyes, the statement you make below and the one I make are equal in the point they convey?? Although you go on later to agree that it depends on the criteria, we're not saying the same things in the 2 statements below.

:laughs:

Sorry, I didn't explain myself as clearly as I should have, HM. :crying:
What I meant to say is your statement is basically an extention of what I said. You added criteria which I agree with. You can add more criteria if you like.

Yours conveys a simple matter of personal taste or outside influence. Mine says beyond simple personal tastes, the degree of criteria a person uses affects their comparisons of like things. For example, some see "enhanced" tits as a detraction irrespective of the quality or effect on a girl's appearance. Others don't draw a distinction between "enhanced" tits and natural tits as long as they look good.

You put some butter on my toast. Once again I agree. I see nothing to disagree on here. :2 cents:

I suppose the point of it is as lucid as every reply you've made in this thread beyond your basic point.:cool:
.

:laughs:

You should re-read my response. I never compared her to Rembrandt but to Rembrandt's work.:2 cents: And I think you either missed the point of that post or read into it the wrong way.
.

It was very clear to me that you were comparing GG to Rembrandt's work. I should have typed an "a" before Rembrandt to make it clear that I was also refering to Rembrandt's work. :thumbsup:

But if you want to try and relate it to this thread...let's. The context of this thread is why is GG so popular (presumably) as compared to other models on FOs? If it's your suggestion that she is somehow more popularly advertised here beyond what's been done for others, where is the case for that?

GG clearly gets her fair share of advertising here at freeones. This thread is a perfect example. I'm talking about her even though I'm not really a fan. Every time an OCSMs name is used or a pic is posted it's advertising/promotion. I've no idea if she is somehow more popularly advertised here beyond what's been done for others as I don't pay much attention to GG. Models with dark hair, skin and eyes are noramlly of more interest to me. I simply reply to posts that catch my attention to.

However, I would guess she is more popularly advertised because it would make good business sense to promote the more popular models. She is cleary very popular.

If freeones were running a promotion they are much more likely to use a very popular and well recognised face like GG than a less well known model, aren't they? So my guess is she probably does get a bit more air time then say Rebekah Dee. That's business. That's life. :2 cents:

Further, when you look at the Miss FOs contest for example and her placing...among those who did promoted themselves (versus those who did no promoting) for the contest..she probably promoted herself the least. Yet she placed quite prominently (5th) and the only one of the 10 finalists who doesn't perform hard core. To what do you attribute that? Certainly some of it is her being a familiar OCSM here but if it were just about that she wouldn't have even made the top 50 IMO. As there are other, more familiar, possibly more "popular" OCSMs who didn't place in the top 50.
.

:laughs:

Let's not talk about the FO contest. I don't think anyone of us regular members knows what was really going on behind the Miss FO thread. I'll just say this. If I remember correctly at one point even some of the contestants were questioning the vote count. Let's just agree GG did very well and leave it at that.

I'm disappointed. It took you this long to get to the proverbial vested interest response.:crying: Besides, if I can't even convince someone like you, how accomplished can I actually be at it?:tongue:


But why would someone with a vested interest in promoting GG create a thread seeking to find others as good or better?

I was just joking with you HM. I hope I didn't hit a raw nerve. :dunno:
You can create as many GG posts/threads as you like. Knock yourself out. It's a huge board.

Really??:rolleyes: I suppose that would have been the point of me suggesting how superficially one person may look at something as compared to how intricately another may.

Now this bit is funny because if you go back and have a look you will see all I did was type the words:
'I think the results of any comparison'
before your reply and post your response back to you. Once again I basically agree with you and there is nothing to disagree on here in my opinion.
 
Amy Reid I have never got. That she has a fantastic body, cannot be denied, but I don't find her very attractive.

:1orglaugh

The only thing you need to get your head around is the simple concept that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Our tastes are not the same and never will be. Once you understand and accept this concept you'll be fine. :D

No rush, I'll give you another ten years. ;)
 
ive never gotten the craze either..
fake boobs (which shes had for so long are actually saggy)
she goes in for lipo a couple times a year
the bleach blonde hair thing is played out

and all her content is the same, just wit a outfit change
 
I met her on person and she is way hotter when ur next to her... that bright awesome smile of her is awesome
 
I met her on person and she is way hotter when ur next to her... that bright awesome smile of her is awesome

I agree, she is also pretty tall lol
 
Top