I disagree. It's often assumed that three names are used to identify an infamous killer so as to avoid cases of mistaken identity—so other guys named Lee Oswald or John Booth wouldn't have their reputations damaged, for example. But some of the most famous three-named assassins identified themselves as such before they committed their crimes.
respectfully that aint it.
the reason why is exactly as i posted in my 2nd post here.
who really cares if their names are the same as some common persons?
almost every name has a double.
some kind of hidden respect thing by the media?
respect for the other people named john booth and jared loughner?
no way.
and if that is the case why not apply that to every criminal or person that makes the news?
trust me the media doesn't care about that.
they care about people reacting to a name, becoming interested and watching, reading and buying their news
its like a pavlov and his dog type thing.
In this thread i know i am correct.
It goes back to the three named assassin of Lincoln and since then the newspapers and people in general automatically relate an assassin with a three named person.
this guy, jared, how many jared loughner's are there anyway?
we might get him confused with jared laughner the 3rd grade student from jerkwater usa?
just the fact that the media dubbed this guy a three namer so soon proves my point.
the bernhard goetz qoute i posted backs it up.
if it turns out he's not the guy he'd be plain old jared loughner once again
you all can make all the unfounded guesses you want here but i'm right in this case.
How do i reach these keeds?
:hatsoff: