Why Are Liberals So Condescending?

Let's invite the TP brigade in on this debate ... :uohs: :D
 
I haven't read the original post, nor have I read through the thread. I have just one comment to make, and then I'll leave the thread forever.

All liberals? All liberals are condescending? Are you making sweeping generalizations based on nothing but a couple of anecdotal instances by chance?

Every over generalized statement in history is totally fucking retarded.

(see what I did there?)
 
You seem constitutionally incapable of responding to the content of posts. :confused:

Why should I? You'll probably just condescend me anyhow ;)
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
Why is the Sky Blue? Ancient Chinese riddle for everyone I suppose, who the hell knows why liberals are condescending.
 
Objective post. I suppose though, issues crash down on what's "right". I think if a person considers what's fair, reasonable and consistent in an issue...they'll most likely be correct or "right". I don't think getting shit done has to come at the expense of what's right. Caring about "right" isn't wrong....Caring more about being seen as "right" than what's right is wrong IMO.
Precisely what I mean. :thumbsup:
 
Due to the amount of threads by PlumpRump that pertain to liberals, I have come to the conclusion that the person behind the keyboard on his account is none other than Sean Hannity.

Incidentally, this means that Hellraiser is Micheal Moore...
 
Due to the amount of threads by PlumpRump that pertain to liberals, I have come to the conclusion that the person behind the keyboard on his account is none other than Sean Hannity.

Incidentally, this means that Hellraiser is Micheal Moore...

And they secretly are fascinated with each other, right?
 
And they secretly are fascinated with each other, right?

I heard that too...I also heard Hannity wanted Moore but couldn't get it up without a picture of Bush.
 
I dont think either party has the rarified air of saying they dont resort to cheap tricks, unfair tactics, condescendion or obstructionism as a platform. Both parties are guilty of all four.

Politics is a dirty game, if you are not in power you seek to gain it back by all means available.
 
Seems to me that if you aren't willing to field comments that could be considered condescending you might consider not creating threads with volatile political content.

Just an idea you might consider. :2 cents:

I've considered it. But I really have no problem being called, or actually being condescending. First and foremost, I'm a misanthrope... so being condescending comes with the territory.

Due to the amount of threads by PlumpRump that pertain to liberals, I have come to the conclusion that the person behind the keyboard on his account is none other than Sean Hannity.

Incidentally, this means that Hellraiser is Micheal Moore...

If my hair looked even half as good as Hannity's, I could die happy.
 
this is the reason why bigfoot won't go away..... without the mystery bullshit is not an option

:hatsoff: :does the Macarena (well, I lie...just watches the hot chicks from the video doing it in my mind):
 
Liberals are condescending because that's the one thing they do best.

In these mid term elections, liberals and Obama are really going to take a sound beating. Their only recourse is to go as negative as they can. The facts are nonwithstanding, Democrats have compounded this countrt's problems and there is no escaping the facts.
 
GOPers spend all their time playing in the mud and the gutter the complain about progressives (so called Liberals) talking down to them.:facepalm:
 
isn't it hard NOT to talk down to someone claiming that the Earth is 6000 years old,that men had pet dinosaurs,that drilling oil is 100% safe,that human activity does NOT have an effect on the planet's climate?
how hard is it NOT to talk down on someone that wants to get elected by claiming that (s)he is "just a common man", that Jesus is the answer,that the only problem of the States is whether gays will be allowed to get married etc,without making ANY mention of why the country is broke,why the corporations got the country in the mess it's in and why the US is hated all over the world.

It's sad to see how Republicans have gradually lowered the level of their arguments,the level of their speakers,the level of the issues they consider important,while in the meantime do nothing but repeat the SAME "solutions" (smaller government,lower taxes,etc etc) that the US in the shit it's in right now.
It's as if the GOP WANTS to look dumper and dumper,wants to lower the intellectual level of political arguments,so that the real issues do not actually get discussed.Because,when you have a "dump" guy talking to a "smart" guy,it's the dump one that "makes the rules",because he drags the "smart" one down to its level.If the "smart" guy tries to complexify the talk,he looks bad (as if he's not respecting the lower intellectual level of the "dump" guy),and if he goes down to the "dump" level,he looks bad too,because he just cannot function on that field.
it's win-win for the "dump" one.
it is a shame for such a great country to have people like that represent them.it's just a way to keep people's minds down,lower and lower every time,thus maintaining the same status quo that suits the rich and the powerful.We talk about God,gay marriage,abortions etc,we fire up people over issues that have nothing to do with the real fate of the country,and let Wall Street and the corporations do their job in making money,while ruining people's lives.smart,hey?
it is a shame for the US to have someone like Sarah Palin even as a potential candidate for the presidency.it is a shame that being educated has come to be considered a "minus",that being eloquent is now a crime.A politician that makes you feel ok with your inadequacy is just dangerous.instead,these ones get more and more exposure,while the real issues get occulted.
 
Top