Which do you value more Beauty or Performance?

[Leale]

I was about to vote for performance but... I have to admit that if I don't like her I don't care about how we perform... but beauty sounds to me like something ideal... I just ask to like her, that's all

 

[lucky4]

performance... I think with the right set up, make up and all that other crap that any average girl can look pretty hot. any girl can suck a cock or take it in the ass, but only a real winner does it with style:2 cents:

 

[parker]

To me there's nothing more dick hardening that seeing a drop dead gorgeous girl doing nasty stuff...example Gauge, Taylor Rain, newcummer Teagan Presley, Wendy James,etc. Both If I have to choose between a) Beauty or b) Performance.. I'll take option b). For example I'll rather watch a movie with the following less atractive stars such as: Jasmine Lynn( a real dick hardening nasty little slut), Alicia Rhodes, Erica Kane, Demi Marx, Brooke Balentyne, Ashley Blue ( a true slut, yumm), Anna Nova, Kami Andrews rather than any of those disgusting lame ass Vivid videos with Jenna Jameson, Janine, Tera Patrick, those are all beauty no substance or in this case poor performance...they look like they don't like what they are doing...

You think Gauge and Taylor Rain are better looking than Erica Kane and Kami Andrews? To each his own I suppose........

 

[SacramentLoG]

Beauty deftinely

 

[Patton]

I dont understand this about "beauty over performance"

I mean, if you want beauty watch pics....
I want a hot porn scene, and then its mort important how they do more then how they look like.....
Of course I dont want an ugly girl in a pornscene, but average looking with great intensity is two times better than model-girl which cant get wet and just lay there....

Couldn't have said it better myself. Performance is key.

 

[JDisturbed]

I would rather have a good that's good looking than to have one good in the sack...

 

[lesbian2002_69]

Beauty takes the cake

 

[kami]

You think Gauge and Taylor Rain are better looking than Erica Kane and Kami Andrews? To each his own I suppose........

thank you!

 

[parker]

You're welcome.

 

[Smittmaestro]

Both but there are I few I dig who aren't what you call "beauties" though I disagree with that.
But you look at a Chloe Nicole or a Brooke Balentyne or even Luna Lane, though I find them beautiful, they aren't the typical beauties. Ie Big breasts, nice ass or supermodel looks, but they deliver the goods everytime.

-cs™

 

[9inch]

Beauty first then I take a look on the perfs...

 

[D-rock]

Both, but I think beauty is more important. A bad performing woman that is nice looking I can deal with. Somebody that is ugly but performs well still won't do it for me.

 

[agggelos21]

i think beauty comes first for me!!!!

 

[hedonis]

I'm a performance guy- there are a lot of average-looking porn chicks that are made better by the fact that they are great at getting down and dirty, whether it's oral technique, the way they move, the sounds they make.

So I'd go for performance, though, in a perfect world we all get beautiful girls that give good performances.

JW

 

[Ludovico]

I voted for both, there is nothing like seeing a gorgeous girl putting in a mindblowing performance