Both won't accept a lousy 200, in any currency, without justification of where and how you got that money.
I walked into Halifax about 4 weeks back and handed over £700 no questions asked. Never had any problems with them.
Moi ***** 'e 'ooked me up wiv a riyt niyce biwwdin sussitee acaaant, 'e did, wen I woz a liuw geezah. An' you know wot mate, wen I woz sumfink liyk foww-eeyn, 'e only wenun cashed oww the bloomin money ahht, dinnee. 'E took, cor blimey, musta bin sumfink liyk noynundred quid. 'Assit mate, 'e said. Oww gone. 'Ope y'undastand, mate. An' 'at woz it. An' you know wot mate... it was Abbey ****** Nashnuw, as wew.
Has English failed you? I thought we were a English forum.![]()
Two threads about banks? OK..:dunno:
Wow loosen up board police, I thought he was being funny.
I'm not being the board police. I was talking to Fox. He will know what my post means. Sir "all in my mustard and can't catsup."
:glugglug:
LL
You win chicka, I've no condiment come back. :wave2:
I thought of some more banks we could discuss. How about Briana Banks? Kelly, would you do Briana? Those are the kind of banks I'd like to make several deposits in.
Fox
Halifax are more of a building society i use to have a current account with them, & one time i lost my card and it was 3 weeks till i got another, real bad service.
so after that a changed over to Loyds T.S.B
British Banking Procedures costs the Country Billions.
In a complete disregard to the UN Charter of Human Rights and the principles that comprise "The Rule of Law" the British banks have created a situation that hinders a free and open market and entrepreneurship. They argued through propaganda that credit fraud was rampant and difficult to control in England to excuse instituting a policy of "guilty until proven innocent" with all customers. When in effect they were aware that all they required was to implement "over-draft protection." Something American banks have been using for 25-years at a fraction of the cost.
Over a staggering 85% of what UK banks call credit fraud is when someone makes a purchase paid from his account with insufficient funds available at the time of sale. Statistics show that over 97% of these are done innocently, most of these errors are for less than £20. Caused by people losing track of their balance; they are quick to rectify the situation when brought to their attention. These errors could be completely avoided by modernizing and implementing real time banking with regards to ATM systems; something commonplace in the rest of Europe and North America.
This hardly warrants the current situations where new clients with less than 2 years banking history must apply to receive a new account and wait 4-6 weeks to see if they are accepted. After which they must wait a further 6 months before they are granted normal banking privileges, such as a bankcard or an interest bearing account. The result of this has been to discourage new investment from both domestic and foreigners. It is such that other citizens of the E.U. use 3rd party money transfer agencies to send funds they have earned here back to more modern banks in their own countries. Although the banking system defends it's action stating their procedures save several millions each year. But in contrast it is estimated that almost £ 4 billion earned in this country leaves to create cash flow in other nations
It does seem odd though that a $200, 200 Euro, or 200 Pound deposit would be questioned. I could understand them evaluating the bills for legitimacy, but if it was a check or direct deposit or wire xfer I'd not think they'd even raise an eyebrow since there's no risk on their end - they won't credit your account until the funds are actually there.