"What makes men attractive" is subjective to the person that
finds them attractive, surely?? In terms of
physical attraction, money is an irrelevance. Physical attraction is from what your eyes and ears tell you, and if you go all-a-quiver once you find out somebody's loaded, you're not physically attracted to THEM, it's the money itself that's excited you. "Financially viable" is of course a factor for many women when they're looking to settle down, but we're not talking about settling down, just attraction.
Just like guys, in my experience girls go for different things. Yes, some will be drawn to typically good-looking features or a good physique. For some, a nice pair of eyes takes precedence over the rest of the visual. Some girls I know absolutely don't give a monkeys about what a guy
looks like, they get turned on by confidence or a guy that appears "rugged" i.e. manly - not typically good looking but stocky and carries himself like he can take of himself (and subconsciously, her). And as cliched as it sounds, I know lots of girls that go for sense of humour. It's rubbished by a lot of guys as just something people
say is important, but I know girls that literally start going weak at the knees and getting that hungry look in their eyes once the guy has made them laugh a few times. The phrase "laugh me into bed" is something I've heard from one of my oldest female friends. I know plenty of women that have settled down with guys for all sorts of different reasons and will have been initially attracted to them for
some reason, some of them don't have traditional good looks, some of them don't have money, some of them have
neither.
So, the somewhat boring, predictable answer is.... it's in the eye of the beholder.
Women are more attracted to the bulge in the back of a man's pants than in the front
And men only like girls with big tits.
Oh, wait... that's a lame, outmoded, sexist generalization, isn't it?