ForumModeregulator
Believer In GregCentauro
What do you think? I was trying to convince my friend (not because I am some super pot supporter or anything) that ********* is far less hazardous than *******. I would say that aside it from being way less physically addicting, ******* seems to have a lot more problems socially and outside of the individual. I tried explaining that ******* is socially acceptable so it is presented EVERYWHERE as a normal thing to do. ********* on the other hand is ******* in a lot of places, and thus already considered to be a dangerous ****.
But in the end, smoking pot carries the risks of smoking tobacco, inhaling smoke is never a healthy thing. Both are considered to be psychoactive *****, But ******* comes addiction, liver disease, cancer, dementia, diabetes, stroke, heart disease, and overdose/death. To me if you get over the whole social roles, and just compare the ***** scientifically, ******* is paradoxically more dangerous than the other.
But in the end, smoking pot carries the risks of smoking tobacco, inhaling smoke is never a healthy thing. Both are considered to be psychoactive *****, But ******* comes addiction, liver disease, cancer, dementia, diabetes, stroke, heart disease, and overdose/death. To me if you get over the whole social roles, and just compare the ***** scientifically, ******* is paradoxically more dangerous than the other.
