What is the optimal cup size?
- Thread starter V-Man
- Start date
No, but I would have voted for xxxena 32fff tits or Ashley Evans 48hhh or Brittany ONeil tits if we are talking about mega :boobies:V-Man said:Btw no one except me have voted for Giant J-cups!? :eek:
Have you guys ever seen Alicia 36JJ?
I voted "D-Cups to F-Cups (Large/Big)" but I'm not so selective in real life...
a C cup or a beautiful B can be enough. I'm also not against bigger boobs, FF or G cup, the best example of beautiful huge boobs are page 3 girls :bowdown:
and like JCMSVOBODA said, the most important is how well the body shape is fitting these tits :2 cents:
a C cup or a beautiful B can be enough. I'm also not against bigger boobs, FF or G cup, the best example of beautiful huge boobs are page 3 girls :bowdown:
and like JCMSVOBODA said, the most important is how well the body shape is fitting these tits :2 cents:
Anything Bigger than a Natural Double D is hard to find and if you get a gurl with those.......She a Keeper!
I likes mine D-Cup or bigger. My girl is 46DD and growing! She said her Mom is like a 56DDD.
Peace.
I likes mine D-Cup or bigger. My girl is 46DD and growing! She said her Mom is like a 56DDD.
Peace.
It really depends ... especially when it's about "her" ...
Now that I'm married and having oral and vaginal intercourse, I'm more than happy with my wife's D/DDs (or F when she is heavier). When I cup or pump them, they are more than a handful and wrap around my member just enough that it's just fine. Hell, in the last dozen years of making love to her, they've softened so I enjoy them even more than when I met her as a late teen.
Now if I was dating again and practicing outercourse -- especially mammary -- I might change my tune again ...
But as at least one other posted, it's really about the female body as a whole. If it's wider or bigger, wider or more hanging breasts look damn fine. I have a series preference for wider hourglass women -- always have since I saw my first FFW girlfriend in a high-cut teddy. Her hips and thighs, as well as her wide and hanging bust, in that teddy absolutely blew away the thinner model who wore it in the catelogue -- at least in my eyes.
From then on I was into hourglass FFW and realized it had nothing to do with "fat" or "big tits." At the same time, hourglass FFW tend to not only have wider breasts, but their optimal fat distribution tends to give them bigger, hanging ones too -- often still on a slender frame. I.e., their bust and hips clearly "bust/bum" out more than 25% of their waist/stomach. I don't want 36D-24-36 -- I want 42F-30-42!
Even Marilyn Monroe and Anna Nicole Smith were 38/40-26/28-38/40. And you don't have to be "taller" to get the proportion either. So it really depends.
Now if my sole purpose to engage in mammary intercourse, yes, larger breasts help. But in reality, when I was single, my "ultimate goal" wasn't to "fuck her tits." In fact, that's really the heart of why I love the women I do! My "ultimate goal" was to get her off all while I to have a visual and physical delight in that. And that meant I went for a wider, hourglass woman because:
1. They were a visual treat from glance #1, regardless of bust or fat
2. I was so into providing her stimulation -- especially oral -- which typically meant I was running my hands up and down her sides just as much as cupping her bust (especially as she was sitting on my face)
3. Included in her total stimulation was a heafty amount of nipple and other areola stimulation that had little to do with the overall size of the mammary gland
4. I often didn't want the "thin babe" and/or the "biggest tits" babe in the room, I wanted a woman who really needed to be appreciated and probably didn't get off as much as she liked
Now in many cases, yes, as a result of her stimulation and, typically, orgasm, she pleased me. And yes, that typically if she had a DD, F or larger bust, the mammary intercourse was softer and more intense -- and it opened up more techniques beyond just the "reverse tit-fuck" but more like the "sitting tit-shelf" as well as "just drooping all over" from above, sitting while I'm lying down, etc... Especially if she was providing oral at the same time, the more hang and size, the more she could wrap them around my penis while sucking on it.
And I do have to admit that the bustier she was and the more she hung, the easier it was to stimulate her nipples (as well as cupping their hand-overflowing nature) while she was sitting on my face. And when doing "reverse tit-fuck," the more her breasts would hang down, the easier it was for me to reach her clitoris and possibly her entire vulva so I could provide oral (that's my favorite position).
But all that was always just a "bonus." Especially for lovers I would only have a few times, they were typically overwhelmed/overjoyed that I just didn't "give her a little lube and stick it in." I was into making sure she got off, and by then, it didn't really matter -- I was in heaven and any outercourse technique was going to satisfy. The very few longer-term lovers I had tended to be DD/F+, and that fit nicely into more mammary techniques, I'll admit.
I can't lie and say a larger bust wasn't more intense than a smaller bust for those moments I was pumping my member into them. Especially for longer-term lovers where I used more and more techniques. A few of the earlier lovers I had with massive F+ cups caused me to go rather quickly, as with anyone's "first time" for anything -- they gave me a "tit-shelf" and I just lost it. I still wake up in the middle of involuntary wet-dreams thinking back to those times of my youth, I can't lie about that.
It's also rather relaxing to have a F+ lover who can just sit while you're lying down in bed and totally rub her breasts up and down your rod without you having to move at all. The softness just totally takes you to orgasm every time, all while you are relaxed and it's not much work for her (other than the lifting of her own breasts). My wife (currently DD) still does this for me now, but I have to pump a bit more and her breasts won't totally engulf my penis.
Although now that she's in her '30s, she can easily suck on her own nipples which means she can wrap her breasts around my penis while sucking it at the same time -- so that's very nice too. Age helps as much as size in some regards.
I agree it's not a "waste."
At the same time, it's not a "requirement."
I never wish my wife had bigger breasts -- never.
Every woman is perfectly designed by God Herself, and I love every women in her perfect uniqueness.
As long as they are up to my "picky standards" on hourglass and width.
And that standard has never netted me a woman who didn't have anything less than a C, with D/DD or larger being the overwhelming majority.
Just an unintentional, but common "bonus" to the figure I go for regardless.
Most men worry about what a woman does and doesn't have, and what she could "have" to "look better."
Every woman I go for has everything I want -- I don't want anything different on her.
And that's why I love being a man, everytime I see a woman that has everything I love!
And that's about 2-3% of the population here in the US -- wider hourglass figures.
Now that I'm married and having oral and vaginal intercourse, I'm more than happy with my wife's D/DDs (or F when she is heavier). When I cup or pump them, they are more than a handful and wrap around my member just enough that it's just fine. Hell, in the last dozen years of making love to her, they've softened so I enjoy them even more than when I met her as a late teen.
Now if I was dating again and practicing outercourse -- especially mammary -- I might change my tune again ...
tunsty said:
I'm with V-Man on that one. I really tire of that phrase too. Maybe if you're only interested in a "rag doll" to bang, and not really hung up on a woman's curves too much, you might think D is the maximum you'd ever want. I guess that might be the case since a lot of people like Crissy Moran and Sandee Westgate here -- sweet hourglass women on a very petite frame, but they have C/D cup breasts (even if enhanced).V-Man said:I respect your preference but explain why it's a waste please
I actually hate that phrase LOL
But as at least one other posted, it's really about the female body as a whole. If it's wider or bigger, wider or more hanging breasts look damn fine. I have a series preference for wider hourglass women -- always have since I saw my first FFW girlfriend in a high-cut teddy. Her hips and thighs, as well as her wide and hanging bust, in that teddy absolutely blew away the thinner model who wore it in the catelogue -- at least in my eyes.
From then on I was into hourglass FFW and realized it had nothing to do with "fat" or "big tits." At the same time, hourglass FFW tend to not only have wider breasts, but their optimal fat distribution tends to give them bigger, hanging ones too -- often still on a slender frame. I.e., their bust and hips clearly "bust/bum" out more than 25% of their waist/stomach. I don't want 36D-24-36 -- I want 42F-30-42!
Even Marilyn Monroe and Anna Nicole Smith were 38/40-26/28-38/40. And you don't have to be "taller" to get the proportion either. So it really depends.
Now if my sole purpose to engage in mammary intercourse, yes, larger breasts help. But in reality, when I was single, my "ultimate goal" wasn't to "fuck her tits." In fact, that's really the heart of why I love the women I do! My "ultimate goal" was to get her off all while I to have a visual and physical delight in that. And that meant I went for a wider, hourglass woman because:
1. They were a visual treat from glance #1, regardless of bust or fat
2. I was so into providing her stimulation -- especially oral -- which typically meant I was running my hands up and down her sides just as much as cupping her bust (especially as she was sitting on my face)
3. Included in her total stimulation was a heafty amount of nipple and other areola stimulation that had little to do with the overall size of the mammary gland
4. I often didn't want the "thin babe" and/or the "biggest tits" babe in the room, I wanted a woman who really needed to be appreciated and probably didn't get off as much as she liked
Now in many cases, yes, as a result of her stimulation and, typically, orgasm, she pleased me. And yes, that typically if she had a DD, F or larger bust, the mammary intercourse was softer and more intense -- and it opened up more techniques beyond just the "reverse tit-fuck" but more like the "sitting tit-shelf" as well as "just drooping all over" from above, sitting while I'm lying down, etc... Especially if she was providing oral at the same time, the more hang and size, the more she could wrap them around my penis while sucking on it.
And I do have to admit that the bustier she was and the more she hung, the easier it was to stimulate her nipples (as well as cupping their hand-overflowing nature) while she was sitting on my face. And when doing "reverse tit-fuck," the more her breasts would hang down, the easier it was for me to reach her clitoris and possibly her entire vulva so I could provide oral (that's my favorite position).
But all that was always just a "bonus." Especially for lovers I would only have a few times, they were typically overwhelmed/overjoyed that I just didn't "give her a little lube and stick it in." I was into making sure she got off, and by then, it didn't really matter -- I was in heaven and any outercourse technique was going to satisfy. The very few longer-term lovers I had tended to be DD/F+, and that fit nicely into more mammary techniques, I'll admit.
I'm not "greedy" either, but I'm picky. To me, the entire woman's curve is most important for my pleasure -- from first contact and impression to holding her afterwards and reminding her how beautiful she still was afterwards.4G63 said:
I can't lie and say a larger bust wasn't more intense than a smaller bust for those moments I was pumping my member into them. Especially for longer-term lovers where I used more and more techniques. A few of the earlier lovers I had with massive F+ cups caused me to go rather quickly, as with anyone's "first time" for anything -- they gave me a "tit-shelf" and I just lost it. I still wake up in the middle of involuntary wet-dreams thinking back to those times of my youth, I can't lie about that.
It's also rather relaxing to have a F+ lover who can just sit while you're lying down in bed and totally rub her breasts up and down your rod without you having to move at all. The softness just totally takes you to orgasm every time, all while you are relaxed and it's not much work for her (other than the lifting of her own breasts). My wife (currently DD) still does this for me now, but I have to pump a bit more and her breasts won't totally engulf my penis.
Although now that she's in her '30s, she can easily suck on her own nipples which means she can wrap her breasts around my penis while sucking it at the same time -- so that's very nice too. Age helps as much as size in some regards.
Hey, I'll be the first to admit she'd be awesome to have. Not only to please her but I'd really get off on mammary intercourse with her. I'm honest enough to admit my selfishness in that regard, but at the same time, it's only a minor part of my intimacy. Far more has to do with aspects of my lover outside of just her breasts -- although breasts can be a "nice dressing" on hourglass curves as a whole.V-Man said:Btw no one except me have voted for Giant J-cups!? :eek:
Have you guys ever seen Alicia 36JJ?
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/5513/alicia1wl.jpg
I agree it's not a "waste."
At the same time, it's not a "requirement."
I never wish my wife had bigger breasts -- never.
Every woman is perfectly designed by God Herself, and I love every women in her perfect uniqueness.
As long as they are up to my "picky standards" on hourglass and width.
And that standard has never netted me a woman who didn't have anything less than a C, with D/DD or larger being the overwhelming majority.
Just an unintentional, but common "bonus" to the figure I go for regardless.
Most men worry about what a woman does and doesn't have, and what she could "have" to "look better."
Every woman I go for has everything I want -- I don't want anything different on her.
And that's why I love being a man, everytime I see a woman that has everything I love!
And that's about 2-3% of the population here in the US -- wider hourglass figures.
Last edited:
Re: It really depends ... especially when it's about "her" ...
I don't only want to fuck the tits, I want to touch, fondle, suck and look at them There is a great joy in just looking at them, in my oppinin there is nothing more beautiful than a pair of breasts. Even if I would never tit-fuck the woman I still want the tits to be huge, I simply think it look better and I enjoy caressing them more. And of cause I want to pleasure her to, a fact is I have always been very carful to get my women off.
Yes I agree but for me the breasts are most important for my pleasure (it has nothing to do with wether I'm gona tit-fuck her or not). A curvy body is very important to though. But I don't know what "greed" has to do with what i prefer. I don't prefer huge tits because I'm "greedy", thats a quite stupid comment (no hard feelings).
As said before, breast is not the "dressing" for me, they are more the "main course" in my book.
It's not a requirement of cause, but it's better for me.
I've never wished anyone had bigger tits either, cuz that would mean she had to get fake ones and i hate that.
As long as they are up to my "picky standards" on large natural breasts. Well to be honest in really life I'm not THAT picky but there's much more to a woman than her body. But thats what I want if I can chose.
Peace!:thumbsup:
Prof Voluptuary said:
I don't only want to fuck the tits, I want to touch, fondle, suck and look at them
There is a great joy in just looking at them, in my oppinin there is nothing more beautiful than a pair of breasts. Even if I would never tit-fuck the woman I still want the tits to be huge, I simply think it look better and I enjoy caressing them more. And of cause I want to pleasure her to, a fact is I have always been very carful to get my women off.Prof Voluptuary said:
Yes I agree but for me the breasts are most important for my pleasure (it has nothing to do with wether I'm gona tit-fuck her or not). A curvy body is very important to though. But I don't know what "greed" has to do with what i prefer. I don't prefer huge tits because I'm "greedy", thats a quite stupid comment (no hard feelings).
Prof Voluptuary said:
As said before, breast is not the "dressing" for me, they are more the "main course" in my book.
Prof Voluptuary said:
It's not a requirement of cause, but it's better for me.
I've never wished anyone had bigger tits either, cuz that would mean she had to get fake ones and i hate that.
As long as they are up to my "picky standards" on large natural breasts.
Well to be honest in really life I'm not THAT picky but there's much more to a woman than her body. But thats what I want if I can chose.Peace!:thumbsup:
Re: It really depends ... especially when it's about "her" ...
I just see too many men disregard so many beautiful women because they see one or two things "wrong with her." To me, when I see that 2-3% of the populous that makes my blood boil, I wouldn't want anything different on her.
To me, the breasts are nothing without the hourglass.V-Man said:I don't only want to fuck the tits, I want to touch, fondle, suck and look at them
I wasn't trying to demonize what you said. I was just saying that an extremely large breast size only makes a difference to me when I'm having mammary intercourse -- especially for techniques that don't work well on C, D or even DD/entry-F cup in a few cases.V-Man said:
I hope you saw that 4G63 said that, and not me.V-Man said:
To me, when it comes to her body, it's the whole package. The fact that most of the women I like have D+ cups has more to do with my preference of a wide hourglass.V-Man said:
I just see too many men disregard so many beautiful women because they see one or two things "wrong with her." To me, when I see that 2-3% of the populous that makes my blood boil, I wouldn't want anything different on her.
On Crissy Moran's 5'2", ultra-thin, hourglass body it is!Calm said:
Other polls ...
V-Man ...
in addition to my first, major poll on women, The Fem'fatale Superpoll:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=56628
And the subsequent poll Female body shapes, width and sizes ...:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=69141
Which eventually lead to the modifications I made to the Wikipedia article Female body shape:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_body_shape
I've had a couple of polls more related to breasts, starting with Multi-Answer Superpoll: Fake and Real Breasts:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=55811
And Feel and look of hanging, saggy breasts ...
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=76444
Those polls, especially the latter two, might give you a better feel on the thoughts of the board members regarding this (and related) topics.
V-Man ...
in addition to my first, major poll on women, The Fem'fatale Superpoll:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=56628
And the subsequent poll Female body shapes, width and sizes ...:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=69141
Which eventually lead to the modifications I made to the Wikipedia article Female body shape:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_body_shape
I've had a couple of polls more related to breasts, starting with Multi-Answer Superpoll: Fake and Real Breasts:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=55811
And Feel and look of hanging, saggy breasts ...
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=76444
Those polls, especially the latter two, might give you a better feel on the thoughts of the board members regarding this (and related) topics.
Re: It really depends ... especially when it's about "her" ...
2. I don't think you were trying to demonize what I said. I was just trying to make you understand that "large breast size makes a difference to me EVEN when I'm NOT having mammary intercourse" (sorry for rewriting your quotes
3. Yeah I saw that it wasn't you. but the key thing here is "the breasts are most important for my pleasure"
4. Yes, the whole package matters. But the rest is reversed to me. If I could rewrite you quote again "The fact that most of the women I like have wide hourglass bodies has more to do with my preference of BIGGER BREASTS." :scream: LOL This is fun!
5. I couldn't agree more! :thumbsup:
Peace!
1. The reverse applies to meProf Voluptuary said:1. To me, the breasts are nothing without the hourglass.
2. I wasn't trying to demonize what you said. I was just saying that an extremely large breast size only makes a difference to me when I'm having mammary intercourse -- especially for techniques that don't work well on C, D or even DD/entry-F cup in a few cases.
3. I hope you saw that 4G63 said that, and not me.
4. To me, when it comes to her body, it's the whole package. The fact that most of the women I like have D+ cups has more to do with my preference of a wide hourglass.
5. I just see too many men disregard so many beautiful women because they see one or two things "wrong with her." To me, when I see that 2-3% of the populous that makes my blood boil, I wouldn't want anything different on her.
2. I don't think you were trying to demonize what I said. I was just trying to make you understand that "large breast size makes a difference to me EVEN when I'm NOT having mammary intercourse" (sorry for rewriting your quotes
3. Yeah I saw that it wasn't you. but the key thing here is "the breasts are most important for my pleasure"
4. Yes, the whole package matters. But the rest is reversed to me. If I could rewrite you quote again "The fact that most of the women I like have wide hourglass bodies has more to do with my preference of BIGGER BREASTS." :scream: LOL This is fun!
5. I couldn't agree more! :thumbsup:
Peace!
V-man said:
You like more, that's greedy. More boob gives you more pleasure, the boobs aren't doing any work, just pleasing you with their size. Any desire for excess is greed. If a woman got implants just because it pleases her, wouldn't that be vanity?
I can think of at least 2 dozen objects I lust for greedily, but not boob size.
Ahhh, interesting! Okay, I get you now.V-Man said:
BTW, the whole reason I switched from "thin blondes" to "busty brunettes" mid-high school was because of Petra Verkaik's centerfold. After that, I had my first F cup girlfriend (never had more than a B before that) and once I saw her in a teddy, I realized it was about the wide hourglass, not the bust. I documented this story on my blog (which is currently down).
I think you can lust for many things, but it's not necessarily greedy. It's more like "compatible." I hope no one marries or "settles" for less than what they want.4G63 said:
So basically what you say is that it's a sin and a shame to like those women that have huge boobs. What shall those poor naturally well endowed women do, die alone as virgins? Remember that I don't support or like artificial enlargements of the breasts, in that case I would rather chose an A-cup.4G63 said:
Yes, why would you want to settle with ANYTHING you don't want? You Might not get exactly what you wanted or dreamed about and can be perfectly happy with that. But if you could have something you want, why not go for it?Prof Voluptuary said:
Last edited:
Similar threads
