Watergate 2.0 in Progress

SPECIAL COUNSEL ASKS FBI TO INVESTIGATE ‘FALSE’ SEX ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ROBERT MUELLER
Premium Link Upgrade

Jack Burkman’s claims against Mueller
Premium Link Upgrade

MARK MEADOWS ASKS FISA COURT JUDGE TO INVESTIGATE FBI APPLICATIONS TO SPY ON TRUMP AIDE
Premium Link Upgrade

MUELLER TEAM REPORTEDLY INTERVIEWED STEVE BANNON ON FRIDAY FOR A SECOND TIME
Premium Link Upgrade
 
Last edited:
CNN: Trump Blames McGahn for Mueller Probe
Premium Link Upgrade

MARK MEADOWS SAYS FBI MAY HAVE SECRETLY RECORDED TRUMP CAMPAIGN AIDE
Premium Link Upgrade
 
Last edited:
MUELLER EXPECTED TO MAKE MOVES AFTER MIDTERMS — HERE’S WHAT HE COULD DO
Premium Link Upgrade

ROGER STONE’S ATTORNEY RECENTLY TESTIFIED BEFORE MUELLER GRAND JURY
Premium Link Upgrade
 
President Trump Reportedly Considering Declassifying Russia Investigation Documents
Premium Link Upgrade

Huge: Sessions’ Replacement Is a Nightmare Choice for Mueller
Premium Link Upgrade
 
Last edited:
The replacement IS a major step - but it rather is what looks like the next step into Trump's attempt to shut down a prosecution against himself.

And with what not only the Mueller Probe has gathered, Trump would have been indicted already, were he not the president, right now. If he makes the move of trying to get Mueller either fired or the Probe stopped by *****, he just shovels on another major crime.

Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread

I guess we will see some kind of big step soon, because we know Trump wants the probe to go away, for fear of what he knows he is guilty of.
 
“ another major crime”.
*lol*

This thread is the messageboard equivalent of picking your boogers and somebody sees you eating them.
 
The replacement IS a major step - but it rather is what looks like the next step into Trump's attempt to shut down a prosecution against himself.

And with what not only the Mueller Probe has gathered, Trump would have been indicted already, were he not the president, right now. If he makes the move of trying to get Mueller either fired or the Probe stopped by *****, he just shovels on another major crime.

Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread

I guess we will see some kind of big step soon, because we know Trump wants the probe to go away, for fear of what he knows he is guilty of.

The mueller probe should never have been authorized but with this new AG, it is going to end sooner or later and that is justified. All this russian bs collusion was fabricated and you know it.
 
And another, small-looking, but significant, issue:

The WH (Sarah Sanders) tweeting a coctored video on an official twitter account of the WH

Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread

Just rying to create the violent image where it was not
 
DEMOCRATS ESCALATE PUSH FOR MATT WHITAKER’S RECUSAL FROM MUELLER PROBE
Premium Link Upgrade

Apparently the democrap weaklings don't like strongminded people. Your Mueller probe bs is gonna end, so screw you deeply democraps :thefinger:
 
Last edited:
And another, small-looking, but significant, issue:

The WH (Sarah Sanders) tweeting a coctored video on an official twitter account of the WH

Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread

Just rying to create the violent image where it was not

Now imagine that was a Fox News reporter and an Obama White House intern.

Just shut up.
 
The replacement IS a major step - but it rather is what looks like the next step into Trump's attempt to shut down a prosecution against himself.

And with what not only the Mueller Probe has gathered, Trump would have been indicted already, were he not the president, right now. If he makes the move of trying to get Mueller either fired or the Probe stopped by *****, he just shovels on another major crime.

I guess we will see some kind of big step soon, because we know Trump wants the probe to go away, for fear of what he knows he is guilty of.

This isn't East Germany. A crime must have been committed in order to investigate, charge, and try an individual. The mentality of "Show me a man and I'll find what he's guilty of..." is antithetical to American Jurisprudence and a wholly unconstitutional waste of time and money. Show me something other than RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA. Which everyone knows is nothing. Even if there was collusion, it is not a criminal offense. And then what do those stupid cunts have other than he's mean to snowflakes and Jim Acosta? BFD. I would push through the next AG appointment post haste and instruct him to fire Mueller and start the investigation into Hilldebeast's emails; money laundering and whatever other malfeasance they can find.
 
This isn't East Germany. A crime must have been committed in order to investigate, charge, and try an individual. The mentality of "Show me a man and I'll find what he's guilty of..." is antithetical to American Jurisprudence and a wholly unconstitutional waste of time and money.

Doesn't square with..

This isn't East Germany. A crime must have been committed in order to investigate, charge, and try an individual. The mentality of "Show me a man and I'll find what he's guilty of..." is antithetical to American Jurisprudence and a wholly unconstitutional waste of time and money.

Trying to have it both ways. Won't work anyway, dat congressional oversight. Don't be a fucking clown.
 
I tend to believe identical posts tend to square nicely.

Not when you're trying to fight off investigations of Trump in one breath then calling for investigations of Hillary in the next, at least not to any normal, sane, and logical constituent, but of course Trumptards are low info and low IQ and an increasingly shrinking minority, so in that context, sure, it squares perfectly. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
A low info voter wouldn’t recognize the difference between an obvious crime and probable cause as is the case with Hillary Clinton and no established crime as with the Mueller witch hunt.

As Ace correctly pointed out.

Oops.
 
Back
Top