I only said that I HIGHLY doubt Veronica Ricci and other established Penthouse Pet models escort
I named two Playboy Playmates that did and thats not something I made up or randomly read on the net, it came out during trials against their customers, so its recorded in public records. So if Playmates do it Penthouse pets sure as hell can to. In fact I am going to do a quick search to see how many Pets I can find that openly escort today.
Name Pet Date
-------------------------
Alex Arden July 2001
Cheyenne Silver December 2001
Isis Taylor September 2010
Lela Star July 2010
That was a 5 min search so there is plenty more to where that came from.
Even if they do keep it "under the radar", if you can find out about it (if it was true), then how easy would it be for Penthouse to find out about it.
It is easy thats why the only conclusion is that they DONT care.
AND definitely don't use Google as a source of information for facts.Anybody can say ANYTHING on the internet. Do you really think that makes it true?
Google is a search-engine so it is not a source but it points you to sources, for example if I search "the US Supreme Court" guess where it will take me.
Internet does not equate false information neither does it equate true information. If BBC posts an article on the web or print it in a paper then it doesn't make the web-version less true just because its on the Internet.
Someone can claim something and back it up with facts and it doesn't matter whether it publicized in paper or on the web.
To equate the Internet with false information simply because it is the Internet, That Ms crack-a-lackin is ignorant.
If a girl says to her fans that a website has stolen her pics and are using them for fake escort profiles, then that is a definite indication that she does not escort. How much more clear does she need to be?
That would be definite if humans where incapable of lying however that is not the case so it is not definite in any way, shape or form.
I actually didn't read the earlier posts but now i see the Veronica Ricci not only had an ad with an escort agency(TLC) but also a review on TER.
TLC has been around for a long and the only way for an agency to do that is to have an good reputation so they would check up that it is indeed Veronica Ricci that they represent. If either the girl advertising or the agency were a scam the customers would quickly abandon the agency. They tell each other about girls and agencies on TER so if TLC were scamming ppl the would be on the blacklist so to speak. They are not.
Secondly Veronica Ricci had an review up on TER, this is NOT something you simply do by posting in a forum. Both the girl and the customer have to have accounts with the site and be verified to be legit. Then the customer can attach a review to the girls account.
In other words TER would not have let let the Veronica Ricci account be made unless they knew it was her. Secondly a review doesn't get attached to her account unless she approves to be reviewed.
So lets see whats makes more sense: A scammer stole Veronica Ricci images and went to an escort agency, impersonated her, got past the agencies verification system, got a customer, fooled or bribed that customer to post a fake review on a site with a separate verification system for both of them just so scammer could have a fake profile on TER. And this convaluted set-up would be revealed when she had her first real customer.
OR
Veronica Ricci did this so that she could fuck guys for money but she failed to be discreet and now its out in the open and she is to ashamed to admit to it so she lies.
I know what I think is more probable and I didnt fuck anyone to reach that conclusion.
