Ok first let me thank everyone for participating.
Part 2 is for the folks who answered "YES" to the question in part 1.I guess anyone who would have replied yes can also answer here in part 2 but I am particulary interested and hopefull that those who responded "YES" in part 1 will respond to part 2 .Just to refresh your memories here was how you all voted in part 1.
Yes since the majority wants it. 27 65.85%
No in order to be fair to the minority it should not have it in there. 14 34.15%
And here is the list of "YES" voters.
Yes since the majority wants it.
86150, allconfererence, Artimus, bs5990, bubb, cahen281, cartman24, dave_rhino, Dean Wormer, dirtydubled, DreamSparrow, E-Ann-Hilden, geraldhp42, gmaxman1212, guch8099, jumbo_jim, KingJames23, LootyK, MILF Man, rabdam, rockford80, sammy402002, senob44, snake8512, titsrock, whoremaker, Will E Worm
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=180338
I think the numbers turned out about where they should be based on the polls I have seen nationally on the issue.If anything this vote is probably under representative of the US feeling on the issue as I do think bigger % than shown here supports the under god in the pledge.Now lets get to the question for part 2.
Given your answer to part 1 that "Yes since the majority wants it. "
I want to know if sometime in the future the majority is of a different mind set and wants to eithier remove "under god" or not remove it but add the word "no" so that it would read "under no god" or even possibly something like "under allah" would you feel the same way?
Granted the possibility that a majority would ever be muslim and be able to get "under allah" is probably remote I do not think you can assume the same thing about the possibility of the country becoming much less religious(in the way the europeans as a whole have) and wanting religion not offically sanctioned or even want it possibly discouraged.So my question will only be asked from the non-religious angle.
You are allowed to pick more than I answer as more than one may be appropriate.
Part 2 is for the folks who answered "YES" to the question in part 1.I guess anyone who would have replied yes can also answer here in part 2 but I am particulary interested and hopefull that those who responded "YES" in part 1 will respond to part 2 .Just to refresh your memories here was how you all voted in part 1.
Yes since the majority wants it. 27 65.85%
No in order to be fair to the minority it should not have it in there. 14 34.15%
And here is the list of "YES" voters.
Yes since the majority wants it.
86150, allconfererence, Artimus, bs5990, bubb, cahen281, cartman24, dave_rhino, Dean Wormer, dirtydubled, DreamSparrow, E-Ann-Hilden, geraldhp42, gmaxman1212, guch8099, jumbo_jim, KingJames23, LootyK, MILF Man, rabdam, rockford80, sammy402002, senob44, snake8512, titsrock, whoremaker, Will E Worm
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=180338
I think the numbers turned out about where they should be based on the polls I have seen nationally on the issue.If anything this vote is probably under representative of the US feeling on the issue as I do think bigger % than shown here supports the under god in the pledge.Now lets get to the question for part 2.
Given your answer to part 1 that "Yes since the majority wants it. "
I want to know if sometime in the future the majority is of a different mind set and wants to eithier remove "under god" or not remove it but add the word "no" so that it would read "under no god" or even possibly something like "under allah" would you feel the same way?
Granted the possibility that a majority would ever be muslim and be able to get "under allah" is probably remote I do not think you can assume the same thing about the possibility of the country becoming much less religious(in the way the europeans as a whole have) and wanting religion not offically sanctioned or even want it possibly discouraged.So my question will only be asked from the non-religious angle.
You are allowed to pick more than I answer as more than one may be appropriate.
