True AMATEUR girls who have sex in PARTYHARDCORE !?

[jumping_jacks]

How many camera people are at an event?
Ive noticed that sometimes a lot of the camera men and women seem to stop filming and they'll point there cameras to the ground while they are doing something else or trying to maneuver around all the girls at the party. I think the editing in these "unedited" parts are when this occurs.

 

[mhalladay]

Gerer, don't get to worked up. Tainster banned me for life three weeks ago because I criticized them in an email. They say I'm under 18 (lol, if they would have said 38 it would still be to low) so they have blacklisted me for their safety. That's what 14 years of loyalty get you, I've been a member since PH started in 2003 (except for a couple of occasions of unemployment).

 

[BigMike1]

YEah jumping jacks, the combined two cameras. I doubt they are leaving out anything good, that was the whole point of this new format

 

[forumfan]

Gerer, don't get to worked up. Tainster banned me for life three weeks ago because I criticized them in an email. They say I'm under 18 (lol, if they would have said 38 it would still be to low) so they have blacklisted me for their safety. That's what 14 years of loyalty get you, I've been a member since PH started in 2003 (except for a couple of occasions of unemployment).

Wow, they don't take that criticism well do they. If you get bored you could probably find someone higher up and get some people fired. It's sad because I've always thought they could be a great site if they cared at all about customer engagement.

 

[gerer]

Gerer, don't get to worked up. Tainster banned me for life three weeks ago because I criticized them in an email. They say I'm under 18 (lol, if they would have said 38 it would still be to low) so they have blacklisted me for their safety. That's what 14 years of loyalty get you, I've been a member since PH started in 2003 (except for a couple of occasions of unemployment).

lol if only tainster listened to subscribers, it would be lot better, interestingly the description of ph 66 part1 cam1 says , you asked for it,now we bring multicam, as if they ever listened to subscribers, what ever the reason, stop filming , point to the ground , they should not edit it, if it was stopped put up a note cam was restarted, it should be unedited uncut video , the new update of `Fuck Party Inside a Fuck Party` says its produced by eromaxx, if its back tainster should sell it back to eromaxx.

 

[mhalladay]

Wow, they don't take that criticism well do they. If you get bored you could probably find someone higher up and get some people fired. It's sad because I've always thought they could be a great site if they cared at all about customer engagement.

Crazy thing is I've sent 3 emails since which have all been ignored so I tried emailing vsxbill (the payment processing company). Vsxbill replied that they have no power as they are only the payment processing company but that they would email Tainster to see what is going on. I haven't heard back from vsxbill so it's likely Tainster doesn't even respond to other companies! Easily the worst customer support I've ever encountered online. I have NEVER received a response for an email from them since they took over in 2009.

 

[BigMike1]

lol you should talk to Consumer Report about the evil porn site that doesn't respect your porn rights ...seriously this bitching ruins the tone of this thread

 

[fiereke]

Lol, turned down by a porno website. That really sucks....

 

[fiereke]

Lol, turned down by a porno website. That really sucks....

That must je the saddest thing i ever read here. That's even worse than Being turned down by a prostitute with your pockets full of money...😂😂😂

 

[ralpal6]

Does she appear in any other parties?

 

[fiereke]

Why is staff taping a tarp over the stage in phc gc36 part 3? Have you noticed that all references to the url "partyhardcore.com" disappeared in 2017? The venue used to be covered with "partyhardcore.com" signs until 2016.

 

[forumfan]

So part 3 cam 2 of party 66 was actually pretty good, I was happy to see the chubby blond girl for a lot longer even if she didn't get fucked. I'm looking forward to other parties, especially the later half, obviously.

 

[fiereke]

So part 3 cam 2 of party 66 was actually pretty good, I was happy to see the chubby blond girl for a lot longer even if she didn't get fucked. I'm looking forward to other parties, especially the later half, obviously.

http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?720768-Selena-(YoungFatties) that's Selena from youngfatties BTW.

 

[fiereke]

Funny: ph 78, a pornstar that is allergic to cum is like a seasick fisherman: mismatch made in heaven.

 

[flydip]

shit editing was the reason for multicam request

Too many cuts were one reason, the other (arguably more important) one was getting to see stuff that was filmed but never released. I don't really see that they're not (largely) delivering on that. It's just that there will be some good scenes that no camera caught, at least not intentionally rather than accidentally somewhere in the background. I think basically if there was a good scene in the original edit that you only ever saw happen in the background when you looked closely and repeatedly, chances are that's all we'll ever get to see of it. It's bound to happen like that in an event that's not been choreographed start-to-finish, down to the last quickie somewhere in a corner. I have more hopes for all those scenes that were visible full-on for 5 seconds before the idiot editors decided to cut to some girls dancing and looking bored. We already know those were filmed. Vol. 66 is basically among the worst parties in the whole 50..80 range I think (there were some GC ones that lowered the bar even more), so I wouldn't really base my judgement on this too much.

 

[forumfan]

http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?720768-Selena-(YoungFatties) that's Selena from youngfatties BTW.

Thanks fiereke, I remember seeing her thread or her posted in the PH in porn thread but totally forgot to DL the video then so I appreciate it. Looks a lot better with cloths on so pity she didn't fuck in this party.

 

[gerer]

I have more hopes for all those scenes that were visible full-on for 5 seconds before the idiot editors decided to cut to some girls dancing and looking bored. We already know those were filmed. Vol. 66 is basically among the worst parties in the whole 50..80 range I think (there were some GC ones that lowered the bar even more), so I wouldn't really base my judgement on this too much.

the earlier they stop editing multicam , the better, soon there will be new parties with mutlicam, if they continue with the same GC shit with no action and silly editing this will make PH even more worse, PHGC should have more action to match up with multicam and shit editing should stop, camera accidentally not picking up action can we ok, but action that can be clearly seen and not covered is not fine, PH just should look at their own old parties to improve , fire Gina get ales back

 

[a562904670]

From PH Vol. 79... this girl made her only appearance and is never seen fucking or sucking in the photos, but she does briefly suck off one guy... I take it she is an amateur?

hey guys .do you know this who is this girl now?

 

[Ajsanchez]

Yes, she's been identified in a thread somewhere specifically about her. Anetka Lipsova

 

[Sportymarc]

anyone knows this cutie?
you see her on ph2007-05-21, ph2007-05-28, ph2007-06-04 and ph2007-06-11
she got a scorpion-tattos left to her bellybutton.
didnt find her anywhere else.

later on i found a girl in ph56 and ph58 that could probably be her. but no shots on her belly where i could check the scorpion-tattoo....

you guys are absolute partyhardcore-pros. lets hope, you can help me in my journey.