You see Mega, how a single characteristic can turn a person off? You can find someone very attractive, but the fact that this person has male genitalia completely turns you off. That's understandable. However, it's a little ironic that you are the same one that suggests that pretty much anyone not attracted by black people is a racist. I don't think you are the equiavalent of a "racist" towards shemales, anymore than someone who's turn off by black cock, for example, is a racist towards black people. Like you said, to each it's own.:2 cents:
Transsexuals
- Thread starter serenitytyler
- Start date
-
- Tags
- annoying
You see Mega, how a single characteristic can turn a person off? You can find someone very attractive, but the fact that this person has male genitalia completely turns you off. That's understandable. However, it's a little ironic that you are the same one that suggests that pretty much anyone not attracted by black people is a racist. I don't think you are the equiavalent of a "racist" towards shemales, anymore than someone who's turn off by black cock, for example, is a racist towards black people. Like you said, to each it's own.:2 cents:
You couldn't be more wrong for a variety of reasons.
First. IF I WAS GETTING PAID TO FUCK....I've ALREADY veritably taken OUT the prospect of fucking solely on personal preference. The primary factor as to why I would be fucking someone would be pay. And who I would be fucking would be based largely on who I was contracted by....NOT MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE.
And I couldn't disagree more with your attempt to clump the heterosexual decision of a person who fucks females solely based on preference like me
with the idiotic notion of contrasting anatomically different people.
A heterosexual being paid to fuck the opposite sex of any stripe is nowhere near someone who is heterosexual being turned off by the sight what they think is a chick who then is revealed to have a fucking rod between it's legs.
Like trying to equate some straight chick seeing a head shot of what she thinks is a dude and when she looks at the full pic....the thing has double D knockers.
Sorry...try again.
Refering to people as "it" and "thing"...ummm, how typical of a person decrying discrimination, but only when it affects their group.
A heterosexual, a pornstar in this case, is not being paid to fuck the opposite sex of "any stripe." Show us a contract in which such absurdity is stated. Obviously every contract is different with each company, and the girl in question signs if she can put up with it. To some girls, signing a contract does not necesarily equates to having to perform interracial obligatorily, otherwise they would be getting fired for refusing.
Point is, just as this can turn you off, and that doesn't make you "hateful." Someone can be turned of by your complexion or race, and that doesn't make them "racist." As you said, to each their own... :2 cents:
What are you talking about?....I'm not being discriminated against. Nice assumption.....but that's typical a person who believes someone must have a dog in a fight in order to make a case for or against something. Still not sure you even understood any of the points I made. As you continue to make the same fairly asinine, irrelevant assertions.Refering to people as "it" and "thing"...ummm, how typical of a person decrying discrimination, but only when it affects their group.
I didn't say (even if it may have been implied) heterosexual porn performers who are paid to fuck people of the opposite sex of any stripe was the exclusive type of arrangement. But certainly when you're under contract to make scenes you agreed to....there is no list of people you will perform with. Who you perform with is up to the producer at that point and it's certainly less subject to your person preference.
Again, your rudimentary suggestion that people in general can be turned off by very simple things was understood, stipulated to and acknowledged a century ago a billion times in a trillion threads by me. However, that wasn't the point...there are many things porn performers do that isn't necessarily their cup of tea that they do anyway. Secondly, what has been the case (which you still seem to conveniently ignore time and time again) is the fact that in spite of what is said, when the onion layers are peeled back...it has ultimately been about some element of racism. It's been demonstrated over and over again. Lastly, I won't even entertain your absurd comparison again...
I'm going to say this once again, I personally don't give a **** about I/R porn....I don't want people who don't want to perform it to perform it...I don't want to ban the chicks who don't do it. I DON'T GIVE A ****.
But on the simple question of whether racism on some level plays a role in whether some do it or not....That is obviously the case...to think otherwise is plain intellectual dishonesty or flat naivety and the "not attracted to" explanation has proven time and time again to be a myth. So when it's continually trotted out it sounds less and less credible. That's not anything I want to believe, create or expect....it's proven to be the simple reality.
Now BACK to this thread. I suppose it's up to FOs and they likely have their reasons for not having transsexual models...Personally, I don't want to click on a pic of what I think is a female and it turns out to be something else. To me, that would lower the quality of this site. But my opinion is the only one I can speak for.
I understood immediately that you think comparing being turned off by a beautiful shemale to being turned off by a women with a vagina of a different race is "absurd." However, that's actually a subjective opinion, in which some may agree and some may not. And I am sorry to dissapoint you, but to some people the racial characteristics of a person can be as important as their genitalia, when it comes to sexual attraction, and that's why they refuse to work with certain people.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you said you did not discriminate, but pls. Wanting to throw up merely because you come across something you don't like, is a bit overboard. I, like many other adults, come across a lot of different kind of porn that we are not particularly into, and it doesn't make us wanna throw up. I would have to have a strong aversion against a certain group to feel that way. And as much as you may dislike the comparison, is it really any different than when a guy against miscegenation, wanting to get off, inadvertently opens a link and sees a black man fucking a white woman, but finds it disgusting
ukey:?I also don't think Freeones staff would ignore their fans' sensitivity over this things when it comes to surprising people like this. So the whole concept of opening a link to find something you didn't expected, makes no sense.
Most racists of any race would be turned off by the prospect of seeing or having interracial sex. Duh. But again, your comparison is so absurd that I won't even distinguish it with a comment.
But then you must agree there are many adults who do.
Sighhh...not working but then again, you are making my point.I would have to have a strong aversion against a certain group to feel that way. And as much as you may dislike the comparison, is it really any different than when a guy against miscegenation, wanting to get off, inadvertently opens a link and sees a black man fucking a white woman, but finds it disgusting
We all have our opinions and I just think any site catering to anything would begin to have a problem with some of it's members if they couldn't trust what they clicked.
Practically and personally speaking, if I click enough times on one thing expecting to see another or there was not a clear distinction prior to me clicking...eventually my interest in clicking on thumbnail links to new models would be eroded.
That said, transsexuals are people and I admit it is a little juvenile of me to express what can easily be perceived as disgust and offend the sensibilities of others. For that, I'm man enough to apologize. People merely going about their daily lives the best they can should not be the target of such (for want of a better word) intolerance.
TS model appearance on the main page could be controlled by user preferences.
Don't take too seriously what follows. Natural women? Who is looking the most natural here:
- Premium Link Upgrade (female);
- Premium Link Upgrade (female);
- Premium Link Upgrade (post-op transsexual);
- Premium Link Upgrade (pre-op shemale);
- Premium Link Upgrade (transvestite).
Actually, I like all these "ladies".
Wouldnt know mate Im not into big massive fake boobs , 2nd one didnt work & Im defo not clicking on the last 3 , not into men at all :thumbsup:
I was just trying to say that some real women don't look very natural and that some male-to-female TS may look very natural.
When I saw pics of Danielle Foxxx post-op, I was amazed how much she looks like a real woman, and a very beautiful one.
Actually, a lot a TS wish to be female. It takes time.
Then, if some of then want to stay in the middle, why is it a problem? Does everybody has to be male of female? Does everything has to be black or white?
Similar to my thinking. If you don't like the way it looks. Don't look at it. If you don't like the way it tastes...swallow quickly!
Tricky topic this, being that I am in favour of t-babes (as I like to refer to them) but can see both sides of the argument - especially considering that I am also a huge fan of the front-bum. I'm having difficlty putting my thoughts together coherently on this topic, so will return later today with my response.
At the moment I have a passionate agrument for t-babes being included on the main site, as well as one for a separate site being set up - but in both cases I feel the forum should remain unchanged, as it is because of threads like this that the forum remains a very interesting place to spend my time
At the moment I have a passionate agrument for t-babes being included on the main site, as well as one for a separate site being set up - but in both cases I feel the forum should remain unchanged, as it is because of threads like this that the forum remains a very interesting place to spend my time
Maybe because this isn't a gay porn site? Let's keep freeones actual women ONLY please.
Umm...averagejoe, that's a very discriptive nick for you indeed.
Gay porn sites don't include shemale sections for the simple reason that gay men are not turned on by humans that resemble females. What would be the point?
You can argue that they are bisexual if you want, but most men that like shemales would not wanna fuck the average joe, like your typical gay man would. And if it were true that men into shemales are gay, then near half the population is, considering what polls about shemales suggest.
I notice many guys here use the word gay to ****** other peoples' taste, well... get over it, there is nothing wrong with being gay...but gay men and mtf transsexuals don't mix well sexually.
Similar threads
