Personally, I don't agree with terrorism memorials for two reasons. The first and simpler reason for this is that funerals for individuals (even those protecting their country) are usually only held once, and, most of the time, they're still remembered. Funerals aren't held annually, so why should memorials be? Secondly, the supposed reason hold these memorials is to remember the innocent fallen. But, unintentionally, the people are also remembering the terrorists involved. How many men, women, and children would think of committing a suicide terrorism mission if they didn't get any recognition? "So, then why not just not give the terrorists recognition?" you ask. The simple answer is this: it would be incomplete reporting, similar to a police man or -woman leaving out details of a crime. The only way to stop giving the terrorists recognition, thus not giving them a reason to commit acts of terrorism, is to stop giving the innocents recognition through these memorials. Morgan Freeman once said that the only way to stop racism was to stop talking about it. Maybe a similar method would work for fighting terrorism.