Thin (not full) fucking hips ...

Your take on "thin (not full) fucking hips"?

  • Fuller (any): I'd rather them wider and fuller all-around

    Votes: 61 19.3%
  • Thin (any): I prefer them thin, and I'm indifferent if they have a wide set of hips or a wide chest

    Votes: 16 5.1%
  • Thin (hourglass): I prefer a thin mid-section, then fanging hips and chest

    Votes: 139 44.0%
  • Thin (more spoon): I prefer a thin mid-section, then fanging hips, chest is less important

    Votes: 29 9.2%
  • Thin (straight): I prefer them thin, and I actually like them more straight

    Votes: 19 6.0%
  • Thin (big tits): I prefer them thin with big tits, I don't care about shape except thin

    Votes: 52 16.5%

  • Total voters
    316
This is the type of thing that can become impossible in my eyes. As we all view women differently.

As I read your first post Prof the only thing that hit my mind is "what exactly is he after". Because to the eyes of the beholder a thin frame might be a fucking frame as you put it. As a more built frame might be to others.

Now as I've looked at the women posted so far I've become even more confused as to what your after. As they all seem to be full figured women.

So what exactly in a basic explanation is a "thin fucking hips frame"?

Because all we see so far is full figured women.

Help and I might be able to point you in the direction of some.
 
Thin v. full (mid-section) ...

This is the type of thing that can become impossible in my eyes. As we all view women differently.
As I read your first post Prof the only thing that hit my mind is "what exactly is he after". Because to the eyes of the beholder a thin frame might be a fucking frame as you put it. As a more built frame might be to others.
Now as I've looked at the women posted so far I've become even more confused as to what your after. As they all seem to be full figured women.
So what exactly in a basic explanation is a "thin fucking hips frame"?
Because all we see so far is full figured women.
Help and I might be able to point you in the direction of some.
Women who have a very small mid-section when viewing them straight on.
A few may be "border-line," but others are very thin.

I started this thread because I too many people were posting women with tiny mid-sections over in the "full" thread.
I figured it was time to make a distinction.

I'm sure there will be overlap, yes.
But there won't be extremely thin women in the other thread anymore. ;)

Now if you are referring to the recent post of someone else on Carmela Bing, understand she is full.
She is full at her thinnest (although somewhat border-line), and definitely a solid full with her added weight lately (perfect in my book).
 
Carmela Bing is FULL (not thin) ...

Ah, no.
Carmella Bing is full figured, even at her thinnest (like this set), she is still full.
She clearly belongs in the other thread, even more so with her more recent weight gain.

Please do not confuse "slender" (very fit, little stomach protrusion) on a "full, wide" body with "thin" (narrower mid-section, possibly little to no stomach protrusion).
People seem to think that by "full" I mean they have a gut -- definitely not!
 
Full women who belong in the other thread ...

Okay, I'm going to have to "draw a line."
So far I've allowed the "borderline" women.
That's causing confusion.

Take a good look at a woman, and see if she compares too some of the following ...

- Bettie Ballhaus -- very slender, but just full enough to be a better fit for the other thread
- Camella Bing -- full figured, border-line at her thinnest, but a solid FFW hourglass fanger with just a little weight as of late
- Yulia Nova -- very slender, but still full and busty and probably better for the other thread

And these are really the "thin but going fuller" borderline ...

- Barbie Griffin -- she has various shots that make me wonder sometimes, and the enhancements make it hard to decide
- Danielle Riley -- like Barbie, the enhancements make it hard to see the smaller mid-section, but she's not ultra-thin either

Now here are some prime examples ...

- Lucie Nunvarova -- Ouch! Nice hourglass on a thin frame, but still busty and hipped for just enough pleasure
- Simi -- Serious, fanging hips (and I love it when her lover is jacked right up in them), with a smaller mid-section and nice breasts cups
- Trisha Campbell -- A serious contender for lingerie model, just an absolute delight far too overlooked

So, with those things in mind, let's try to stay original and not dive into the "near/borderline/also seen full figured" women.
Otherwise, they probably belong in the other thread, and with more width, the more extreme the hourglass and fang should be too
(in proportion).
 
I voted for thin with big tits. That is not to say that I don't appreciate larger bodies like Sara Jay, Amber Bach, Sara Stone, Claire Dames, Eden...I guess in all of these polls..I'm voting for whichever option has big tits in it. I think Eden (the redheaded Milf star) has one of the most natural and eye-pleasing bodies in Porn.
 
Re: Thin v. full (mid-section) ...

Women who have a very small mid-section when viewing them straight on.
A few may be "border-line," but others are very thin.

I started this thread because I too many people were posting women with tiny mid-sections over in the "full" thread.
I figured it was time to make a distinction.

I'm sure there will be overlap, yes.
But there won't be extremely thin women in the other thread anymore. ;)

Now if you are referring to the recent post of someone else on Carmela Bing, understand she is full.
She is full at her thinnest (although somewhat border-line), and definitely a solid full with her added weight lately (perfect in my book).

So your talking...

Lucy Pinder, Michelle Marsh, Lindsey Strutt, Keeley Hazell, Seren Gibson, Malene Espensen, Sammy Brody, etc type of figure then?

Busty with a thin waist and shapely lower torso.
 
Re: Thin v. full (mid-section) ...

So your talking...
Lucy Pinder, Michelle Marsh, Lindsey Strutt, Keeley Hazell, Seren Gibson, Malene Espensen, Sammy Brody, etc type of figure then?
Busty with a thin waist and shapely lower torso.
Yes, Lindsey Strutt and Keeley Hazell definitely belong here, Michelle Marsh also.
Lucy Pinder of more recent thinness is also here (she may be border-line in her earlier work).
I'll have to check the others.

BTW, busty is not always a requirement.
A hourglass only requires a wide chest for the hourglass.
But even in this thread, I've allowed more spoon (not much of a wide chest) as long as the hips are fanging.
 
Well you might want to look at the thread I started on Eva Wyrwal then too.

PS
The Sammy I posted should be Braddy, not Brody. Get the names mixed a bit.
 
Audree Jaymes

Audree Jaymes is a thin, black, busty pornstar has a tiny mid-section and some seriously fanging hips.
She almost looks like an upside down Y pipe, as her thighs/legs are almost as thick as her mid-section.
If you want a light woman as a "rag doll" but one who still has powerful thighs for "sucking the cum out of you" cowgirl, she fits damn well.

Check out this set:
http://jugs.juggcrew.com/25p/

Like this shot from behind (so the breasts aren't in the way of noticing that form):
http://jugs.juggcrew.com/25p/img/05.jpg

Her active thread is here:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=13001

And another thread with a lot of links is here:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=58179

BTW, don't think me for posting this, I just ripped it from holycrap's posting in the thread Sidewinder Tits:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=1702223
 
Ultra-thin fanger, plus Aria ...

Way too thin for me, but Moni Michaels might be your type of lover.
She's got a great fang in that hourglass, especially in some of the shots of her second set.
http://aziani.com/gals/monimichaels/monimichaels1.php
http://aziani.com/gals/monimichaels/monimichaels2.php
Like this shot: http://ww2.aziani.com/aziani/monimichaels/2/monimichaels2-004.jpg

And here's a good one of Aria's hourglass-spoon fang:
http://ddfcash.com/PROMO/ddfbusty/pics/6649_01/
Like this shot: http://ddfcash.com/PROMO/content/ddfbusty/pics/6649/fulm/006.jpg
 
Wow! She actuallly might be full ...

Wow! What an extreme slender example!
She might actually qualify as "full" in width.

She reminds me of the wife of a friend of mine after she had a kid.
She literally widened by a half-foot it seemed, and my friend didn't like his wife anymore.

Stupid fuck, she just got cock engulfing hips, and her thighs beefed up in carrying all that extra weight during the pregnancy.
I found her even hotter than before, and I finally convinced my friend that she was still hot.
 
Top