The Trump Presidency

Do you ...


  • Total voters
    149
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's also been reported that support for Trump among Latinos and African-Americans has gone UP since 2006. His support among said groups is higher than any other republican president I believe in my life time. You know what that means? He's a LOCK to win re-election.


Oh, you won't hear any of that in the Fake News with their daily barrage of falsehoods and propaganda, oh no.


They are lying fucking scum.
 
You can't even put a Trump sticker on your car in my neighborhood without everyone thinking you're a fucking **** because of the piece of garbage Fake News and their propaganda. I hope they all go away like dinosaurs for the level of **** they have pushed. Fuck them.

lol My car was trashed twice for having an Obama sticker on it.

But I understand Trumpsters love to revel in their allegedly unprecedented degree of persecution. It's so much of what defines them.

It's also been reported that support for Trump among Latinos and African-Americans has gone UP since 2006. His support among said groups is higher than any other republican president I believe in my life time. You know what that means? He's a LOCK to win re-election.

If it were true you might be right.
But "it's been reported" leaves me anything from convinced.
And in looking at the demographics of his crowds....all these new colored converts must be laying mighty low :)
 
lol My car was trashed twice for having an Obama sticker on it.

But I understand Trumpsters love to revel in their allegedly unprecedented degree of persecution. It's so much of what defines them.



If it were true you might be right.
But "it's been reported" leaves me anything from convinced.
And in looking at the demographics of his crowds....all these new colored converts must be laying mighty low :)

Premium Link Upgrade

Premium Link Upgrade

Premium Link Upgrade
 
This is an interesting poll (for me anyway).

I've disliked Trump the person since the early-mid 90s. But I support the president (whoever it may be, in that I support the republic). When this particular president does something that I agree with, then I support that policy. When he does something that I don't agree with, then I don't support that policy - just like all the other presidents in my (adult) life. I'm not a fanboi, like some on the one side, and I'm not "triggered" by every breath that he takes, like some on the other side though.


I dislike him (the person), and yet I support him (the President)... so I voted neutral. :yinyang: :spin: :turnturn:
 
President Trump showed a doctored hurricane chart. Was it to cover up for ‘Alabama’ Twitter flub?


Trump had erroneously stated that Hurricane Dorian threatened Alabama


On Wednesday, it appears the White House attempted to retroactively justify a tweet that President Trump issued over the weekend in which he warned, erroneously, that Alabama would be affected by Hurricane Dorian.

In a White House video released Wednesday, Trump displays a modified National Hurricane Center “cone of uncertainty” forecast, dated from 11 a.m. on Aug. 29, indicating Alabama would in fact be affected. The graphic appears to have been altered with a Sharpie to indicate a risk the storm would move into Alabama from Florida.
“We had, actually, our original chart was that it was going to be hit — hitting Florida directly,” Trump said as he displayed the graphic from Aug. 29, which now includes an added appendage extending the cone into Alabama. “That was the original chart,” Trump said. “It could’ve, uh, was going towards the gulf,” Trump explained in the video.

Premium Image Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread


Asked about the altered hurricane forecast chart at a White House event on opioids Wednesday afternoon, Trump said his briefings included a “95 percent chance probability” that Alabama would be hit. When asked whether the chart had been drawn on, Trump said: “I don’t know; I don’t know.”

White House deputy press secretary J. Hogan Gidley later Premium Link Upgrade that the drawing was made using a black Sharpie[/url), while criticizing the media for focusing on it.

Trump’s tweet on Sunday came as Dorian was hitting the Bahamas as a high-end Category 5 hurricane, and the tweet sparked enough public alarm that it prompted the National Weather Service in Birmingham, Ala., to bluntly tweet 20 minutes later: “Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian.”

Photos posted on the White House’s Flickr site reveal that Trump did receive the correct briefing on Aug. 29 from acting National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration head Neil Jacobs, in which the National Hurricane Center’s forecast called for Dorian to hit Florida. Alabama was never included in any National Hurricane Center forecast cone for Dorian, though it was included for a time in a map on the probability of tropical storm conditions, but that showed a low likelihood of that outcome.

It is not clear whether Trump was responsible for altering the forecast chart, but the modified photo appeared to show Alabama in Dorian’s eventual line of fire. The original forecast by the National Hurricane Center can be seen Premium Link Upgrade .
The National Hurricane Center’s text bulletin at that time included Florida in its discussion five times, but it did not mention Alabama. Instead, the center urged caution from residents in “the Bahamas, Florida, and elsewhere in the southeastern United States.”

When Trump tweeted his original warning to Alabama, the concurrent National Hurricane Center forecast called for Dorian to pass off the Georgia coast, with the center of Dorian’s expected track passing 300 miles east of the Alabama border. The far western extent of the cone was located more than 150 miles east of the Alabama border.

NOAA did not immediately respond to a request for a statement about the altered forecast map, which has the agency’s official logo.
The White House did not reply requests for comment for this report.

In a Wednesday evening tweet, Trump defended his Alabama warning and use of the altered map by pointing to raw computer model data provided to state and local governments on Aug. 28, a day before his storm briefing with NOAA and four days before his Alabama tweet.

The data shows the majority of models called for Hurricane Dorian to make landfall well southeast of Alabama, most likely in Florida. By the time of his controversial tweet on Sunday, the projections on that map showing potential impacts on Alabama had long been ruled out. He doubled down on that defense on Thursday morning, retweeting the model plot and stating: “Alabama was going to be hit or grazed, and then Hurricane Dorian took a different path (up along the East Coast). The Fake News knows this very well. That’s why they’re the Fake News!”

Altering official government weather forecasts isn’t just a cause for concern — it’s *******. Per 18 U.S. Code 2074, which addresses false weather reports: “Whoever knowingly issues or publishes any *********** weather forecast or warning of weather conditions falsely representing such forecast or warning to have been issued or published by the Weather Bureau, United States Signal Service, or other branch of the Government service, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ninety days, or both.”
That law applies to what is now known as NOAA’s National Weather Service, which contains the National Hurricane Center.
Premium Link Upgrade

As usual Trump shows littel concern for the law and would do anything to pretend he's right, even when all the datas show he's wrong.


Just ad wether forecast to the list of trhings Trump thinks he knows or do better than people who dedicated their live to these things
Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread
 
Trump Economy Soaring: Department of Labor Celebrates Lowest Unemployment Rate in Nearly 50 Years
Premium Link Upgrade

Guys, do you know how you can tell if someone doesn't know **** about economics? When they tout the unemployment rate as an indicator of a good economy.

The unemployment rate is one of the most misleading indicators. It's meaningless
 
There's a recession getting ready to knock this motherfucker off the tracks like Ray Brower, good luck finding [NOBABE]the body[/NOBABE].

Unfortunately, I suspect that the trump recession is going to show up just in time to be blamed on whoever is president after 2020 by the enlightened right, unless it's trump, in which case they'll blame Obama.
 
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin is the 3rd Trump administration member linked to Jeffrey Epstein or his circle

Premium Link Upgrade
 
Asked: "at any time during your investigation, was your investigation curtailed, stopped, or hindered?"

Bob Mueller: "No"

So where's the obstruction bullshit coming from?
 
Since this story isn't exactly, "Breaking!!", what's up with this Whistleblower/Ukraine thing that's getting some traction the last couple of days?

Premium Link Upgrade

Whistleblower complaint about President Trump involves Ukraine, according to two people familiar with the matter
 
Since this story isn't exactly, "Breaking!!", what's up with this Whistleblower/Ukraine thing that's getting some traction the last couple of days?

Premium Link Upgrade

Whistleblower complaint about President Trump involves Ukraine, according to two people familiar with the matter

None of our resident Trump Lovers have an opinion? I'm not rushing to judgement or anything.

I suppose the fuh-fuh-far right needs some time to organize it's collective strategic talking points on this one.
 
None of our resident Trump Lovers have an opinion? I'm not rushing to judgement or anything.

I suppose the fuh-fuh-far right needs some time to organize it's collective strategic talking points on this one.

They're waiting for an official statement from the Trump regime, then they'll have something to parrot on the subject.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top