• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

The Trump Presidency

Do you ...


  • Total voters
    149
Status
Not open for further replies.

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
You still believe in Trump?

Or is that just whistling in the woods? I will just wait for you to wake up. At some point, you will catch up with reality.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
You still believe in Trump?

Or is that just whistling in the woods? I will just wait for you to wake up. At some point, you will catch up with reality.

I believe in facts unlike you and not in leftists and mainstream medias

Cops Give Trump Roar of Approval After Blistering Comparison of Smollett and Impeachment 'Scam'
https://www.westernjournal.com/cops...ff_campaign=pushtraffic&ff_content=2019-11-01

Trump Says He Kept Pelosi and Dems in Dark About ISIS Raid Because of Potential Leaks
https://www.westernjournal.com/trum...ff_campaign=pushtraffic&ff_content=2019-11-01

Trump Rips Pelosi's 'Very Bad and Dangerous' San Francisco District: 'Horrible Shape'
https://www.westernjournal.com/trum...ff_campaign=pushtraffic&ff_content=2019-11-01

GDP Growth Beats Economists' Expectations for Third Quarter
https://www.westernjournal.com/gdp-...ff_campaign=pushtraffic&ff_content=2019-11-01
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
The Dick is laughing so hard he's crying, and it's gotten really hard to tell that he's laughing.
 
Trump: ‘Nothing Wrong’ If There Was A Quid Pro Quo, But I Didn’t Ask For One


The president said even if he had demanded a political favor, asking for a quid pro quo is “not an impeachable event.”


President Donald Trump seemed to suggest Sunday night that while he personally didn’t do so, asking a foreign government for a quid pro quo in exchange for a political favor is not an impeachable offense.
“False stories are being reported that a few Republican Senators are saying that President Trump may have done a quid pro quo, but it doesn’t matter, there is nothing wrong with that, it is not an impeachable event,” Trump tweeted in the midst of a particularly busy night on the social media platform. “Perhaps so, but read the transcript, there is no quid pro quo!”
The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for clarification about the president’s remarks.

The remarkable messaging reflects a swift change in strategy among Republicans who have been scrambling to respond to the parade of current and former administration officials testifying before lawmakers conducting the impeachment inquiry. The Washington Post reported Sunday that a growing number of Trump’s stalwart GOP allies have begun to acknowledge the existence of a quid pro quo, but moved to characterize the demand as a legitimate power of the president.

The demand is the central feature of the ongoing impeachment probe, which arose after a whistleblower first filed a complaint about a July 25 call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During the discussion — details of which emerged from a reconstruction released by the White House and dozens of hours of testimony from senior aides ― Trump repeatedly pressured Zelensky to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter. The call took place shortly after Trump ordered a hold on nearly $400 million in military aid that was supposed to be sent to the country.

Trump has repeatedly denied a quid pro quo, referring to the call as “perfect” and claiming he has done nothing worthy of impeachment. But House Democrats are deepening their investigation into the discussion and the chamber voted largely along party lines to formalize the inquiry on Thursday, hoping to capitalize on growing public support for the probe.
Officials with direct knowledge of the call have spoken to lawmakers. Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, said he twice reported his concerns about Trump’s call to a superior. He also detailed the unusual decision to store the transcript of the call on a secure server usually reserved for state secrets after those concerns were raised.

Republicans, however, have largely remained unified in their support of the president and moved to delegitimize any witnesses who speak to lawmakers while accusing Democrats of conducting their probe in secret (the GOP has many members on each of the three committees spearheading the inquiry).
The Post reported that GOP senators met for a lunch last week, when several lawmakers argued that a quid pro quo may have happened, but the government often attaches conditions to foreign aid.

A recent attempt to acknowledge Trump’s quid pro quo demand drew widespread rebuke from within the party. Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney repeatedly admitted Trump did demand a political favor in exchange for the military aid during an extraordinary press conference last month. But he was forced to walk back those claims mere hours later, blaming the media for misconstruing his recorded remarks.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-impeachment-quid-pro-quo-tweet_n_5dbf79c5e4b0bedb2d4e5bb0


If Trump and the GOP feel the need to argue that a quid pro quoi would not be an impeachable offense, it means there was one. It's almost as they are admittingthere was one.
If there was no quid pro quo, why would it matter wether it is or not an impeachable offense ?
 
:eeew: Getting moist for Schiff :rofl:

I'll tell you one thing.

This is the closest that the organism referred to as Adam Schiff comes to happiness. He is the literal embodiment of the word "anal". When people say, "nah, that dude across the street's all 'anal' about block parties, so we have to take it to the park" - used in that context, if 'anal' were to be transfigured into hieroglyph, it would be Adam Schiff. Unsmiling, embittered, perpetually bewildered-looking, soft-palmed, limp-wristed, bedwetting 'til he was nine years old Adam Schiff.

Orgasmic (in his way) over the prospect of being a historical footnote, the crusading inquisitor in a doomed, sideshow impeachment that will propel Trump to a second term. Kenneth Starr gets more pussy.

I suspect that he especially dislikes Trump, because Trump, the unlearned, uncouth boob that he is, will always be remembered as President of the United States. And Schiff will always have to wait for a table. That's got to piss him off (and so many career politician Dems). I mean, over-and-above his inherent pissed-offedness.

Just look at the stooge. Goofy looking, used Q tip motherfucker :jester:

View attachment 737053

"Yay, woohoo, gavel gavel, come to order - lookit me, I'm Adam Schiff, my name's Adam Schiff - spell that with a C, guys!"

Douche, with a c.

20191105_081015.gif

:rofl2: "Getting good fan mail, Adam? Skank, pathetic, antifa twats dripping for you? Take heart, chief. You've got some pathetic twats dripping, anyway." :rofl2:

 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
Posted by Johan
If there was no quid pro quo, why would it matter wether it is or not an impeachable offense ?

Funny that this is such a problem, if there is nothing going on in this "perfect call"

 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Getting moist for Schiff "Getting good fan mail, Adam? Skank, pathetic, antifa twats dripping for you? Take heart, chief. You've got some pathetic twats dripping, anyway."

You must have learned to ignore the smell of man ass right in your mouth in prison. The good news is, Cheeto Benito and a hefty portion of his administration is going to get to duplicate your experience.
 
White House calls claim that Jared Kushner gave Saudi ruler permission to arrest Jamal Khashoggi before journalist was killed and dismembered 'false nonsense'


White House calls claim in British conservative news magazine's gossip column that Jared Kushner green-lighted Jamal Khashoggi's arrest
Article claims more whistleblowers have come forward to Democrat-led House of Representatives with claims of wrongdoing by Trump officials
Report says one whistleblower is alleging that Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, approved Saudi plans to arrest Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi
According to Spectator, Turkey intercepted call between Kushner and Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and then used it to gain leverage over Trump
Trump agreed to remove American troops from northern Syria after a phone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
White House official calls report 'false nonsense'' Spectator acknowledged of its own report 'whether any of this is true is another matter'




A White House official dismissed as 'false nonsense' Monday a claim that Jared Kushner gave permission to Saudi ruler Mohammad bin Salman to arrest Jamal Khashoggi before he was killed and dismembered.
The claim was made in a report in Cockburn gossip column of the U.S. edition of British conservative news magazine The Spectator.
The report also claimed that Turkish intelligence intercepted the call and President Recep Erdogan then used the information to force Donald Trump to remove his troops from northern Syria.
The report claims that investigators on the Democratic-led House Intelligence Committee are aware of these allegations and are planning to dig further into them while pursuing the impeachment inquiry over Trump's dealings with Ukraine.

It also claims that the number of intelligence 'whistleblowers' who have given or are willing to give evidence to the House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry is seven, one of whom has made the claim about Kushner.
However it counts two of those 'whistleblowers' as Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council's top Ukraine expert, and Tim Morrison, the NSC's director for European and Russian Affairs, both of whom gave evidence under subpoena to the impeachment probe and who both listened to Trump's call to Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Morrison, however testified that he was not concerned that the call contained anything illegal. Neither official is legally a 'whistleblower,' unlike the initial complaint which went through the formal legal whistleblower process.
That would leave three other 'whistelblowers' - although the Spectator acknowledged of its own report: 'Whether any of is true is another matter.'

Khashoggi was a Washington Post columnist who at one point was considered close to the ruling Saudi royal family but later became disillusioned by its powerful young prince.
In October 2018, Khashoggi visited the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to sort documents before he was to be married to his Turkish fiancee, Hatice Cengiz. He never emerged.

The Turkish government said it has evidence that Khashoggi was killed and his body was dismembered.
The Central Intelligence Agency and other Western governments believe that bin Salman ordered Khashoggi's killing
.

In recent interviews with American media outlets, bin Salman said he bears responsibility for the Khashoggi killing 'because it happened under my watch.'
But he denies ordering the murder.
'It happened under my watch,' he told PBS. 'I get all the responsibility, because it happened under my watch.

After initial denials, the official Saudi narrative blamed the murder on rogue operatives.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-call-Saudi-Prince-nonsense-White-House.html



If this is true, it would explain several things : It would explain why the Trump administration was so reluctant to condemn the Saudisd for Kashoggi's murder and why Trump pulled out US troops from northern Syria so fast
If it is true, it mean a member of the Trump administration authorised the Saudis to perform pull an operation that led to the muder of a journalist and a Human Rights activists, that he's been caught red-handed and is now used to blackmail the US government
The president of the United States, being blackmailed by the leader of Turkey. Talk about an "alpha male", talk about America being respected again...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top