Once again you're posting photos with fake statistics.
And unemployment has been steadily decreasing for the past 6 years, but i'm sure it will go back up by 2020.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/193290/unemployment-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
-
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/28/barack-obama-presidential-legacy-economy
"And when you think in relative rather than absolute terms, there’s a lot of legitimacy to that discontent, more than Obama is willing to admit. The chief accomplishment Obama has been touting is job growth: somewhere between 9.3 and 13.6m new jobs over two terms, depending how you measure it, with unemployment falling from 10% at the height of the recession to 5% today.
Donald Trump has disputed these numbers, saying he “heard” real unemployment to be as high as 42%. But even the Labor Department’s broadest unemployment measures, the U-5 and U-6 rates – taking into account discouraged workers, those who have given up looking for work – are around 6 and 10%, respectively, and have been declining as well.
But job growth isn’t everything. Job quality matters a lot, and wage figures paint a less rosy picture. Real median hourly wages have risen as well, but barely: just 7% over the past 7 years. One can see this in where job growth is happening. Those jobs projected by the Labor Department to grow the most over the next decade are concentrated in low wage service industries: personal care aides (median income, $20,980), fast food workers ($18,910), retail salespeople ($21,780), customer service reps ($31,720). A greater share of jobs today are part-time than before the recession.
Then there’s the question of how well those gains have been distributed. Over half of all income growth between 2009 and 2014 went to the top 1% of all income earners, who saw their incomes rise 27%, while the bottom 99% got a raise of 4%, according to Berkeley economist Emmanuel Saez. Median household incomes have only recovered to what they were in 1996, meaning for the vast majority of Americans, the recovery has been one in name only.
As a president who arrived at the White House in the midst of the worst economic crisis in generations, Obama deserves credit for staving off catastrophe. As one who leaves seeking a legacy, he might look for a more compelling one than “it could have been worse.”
There’s good reason for presidents not to pin their legacies on jobs: Obama’s average job growth rate of 1.1% may not match that of Clinton (2.5%) or Reagan (2.1%), but all three pale in comparison to Jimmy Carter (3.1%) and Lyndon Johnson (3.9%): both enormously successful job creators, and both one-term presidents."
