The Trump presidency: Recipe for disaster
- Thread starter Jack Davenport
- Start date
Now that is a fucking lie.
https://www.heartland.org/news-opin...-truth-about-us-unemployment?source=policybot
If the left didn’t have smoke and mirrors they couldn’t survive. How does it feel to a part of an ideology that can’t even cite basic labor statistics without cloaking them in lies?
Ok, no bs, just datas.
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
Series Id: LNS14000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Unemployment Rate
Labor force status: Unemployment rate
Type of data: Percent or rate
Age: 16 years and over
The unemployment numbers were skewed during Obama because his disastrous healthcare mandate caused full time employment to decrease in favor of part time hiring.
Liberals: Been fooling the world with smoke, mirrors and bullshit since 1917.
So, you're using datas you do know to be "extremely misleading" ?
It’s “data” not “ datas”
There’s nothing misleading about it.
You should know misleading, it’s the left’s bread and butter.
Just like your unemployment numbers bullshit.
Unemployment numbers peaked in 2008 and coupled with increased part time hires the numbers were highly skewed.
All that together makes it look like unemployment has been steadily decreasing due to Obama’s economic policies.
Just like the bullshit they tried to peddle about the deficit decreasing under Obama. When you start with. 750 billion failed stimulus in the first year, of course statistically the deficit is decreasing.
Smoke
Mirrors
Bullshit.
It’s all the left has.
There’s nothing misleading about it.
You should know misleading, it’s the left’s bread and butter.
Just like your unemployment numbers bullshit.
Unemployment numbers peaked in 2008 and coupled with increased part time hires the numbers were highly skewed.
All that together makes it look like unemployment has been steadily decreasing due to Obama’s economic policies.
Just like the bullshit they tried to peddle about the deficit decreasing under Obama. When you start with. 750 billion failed stimulus in the first year, of course statistically the deficit is decreasing.
Smoke
Mirrors
Bullshit.
It’s all the left has.
Yes, it is. Not according to me but according to the gallup article you used !
http://news.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx
It's the first paragraph form the article. An article YOU used to support your claim that under Obama, the numbers were skewed.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-right-us-just-had-best-jobs-report-16/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-right-us-just-had-best-jobs-report-16/
The very article you used to claim that under Obama, numbers were skewed actually says, in it's first paragraph, that the numbers you used to defend Trump's policies and their effects on the US economy are "extremely misleading"
You were so eager to backup you claim that under Obama, numbers were skewed, you didn't even realised that it would backfire, totally dismissing the pioint you were trying to make in that thread.
No genius, my point is that BLS, CBO and other governmental keepers of statistical data and forecasts skew the numbers as they see fit.
And even they couldn’t twist the results to mean anything other than unemployment numbers are falling under Trump.
The Gallup article was an opinion piece.
The Politifact link was to my point that even they had to list Trump’s claim as “ mostly true”
More to the point, they could not have made that conclusion if they could have in any way tie the results to Obama.
Try again.
So, Obama was so terrible that they had to skew the numbers in his favor to make it seem like he was getting results but Trump is so good that even with numbers skewed against him, his results are awesome, is that it ?
Anyway, can you prove they skewed the number in favor of Obama and are now skewing them against Trump ?
Anyway, can you prove they skewed the number in favor of Obama and are now skewing them against Trump ?
GodsEmbryo
Closed Account
Irony: using The Heartland Institute as a reliable source while it is sponsored by the tabacco industry to deny the health risks of secondhand smoke, and the oil and gas industry to deny climate change.
Come on man, I'm sure you can find a better source than that.
I’ll stand with my source. Man made climate change is a hoax and second hand smoke is not the danger that has been presented.
I am sure there are better sources than CNN, NBC , WaPo, NYT also.
himperv303
Banned
Stupid and uneducated Trump base can believe in whatever that pleases them. That does not change facts.
You’re projecting, it is obvious you are uneducated and more than likely no older than 19 or 20.
For argument’s sake, we will assume that man made climate change is real and not the hoax that is being perpetrated on civilization.
Since we can affect change, we should be able to consciously do things to change it in any direction we see fit.
So which should be our first experiment? Hotter or colder? Give us your method of achieving it.
himperv303
Banned
President Trump reportedly revives birther claims against Obama a year after denying conspiracy theory he fueled.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...evives-birther-claims-obama-article-1.3664296
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...evives-birther-claims-obama-article-1.3664296
