I prefer the various forms of sports car racing, SCCA GT/Touring, FIA GT, GTCC (DTM), JGTC, LeMans, Rolex, V-8 Supercar, ect... But NASCAR racing is so much more accessible to watch live, The Chicago Speedway is a 30 minute train ride away. The closest Sports Car track is Elkhart Lake 3 hours away or Indy another three hours away in the opposite direction.
I need to see race cars and NASCAR is the easiest way to see them. Racing is never boring to me, but I'm just a gearhead.
Yes, I think the best stock cars are German. What you buy off the floor is desined to handle well up to 155. If US drivers were more focused on driving than phone talking or coffee drinking we'd be able to cruise at 120. I sure as shit do not want to be on the same road with a soccer mom going 135 in her Toyoya LX470 (luxury editon xport US) while she talks on Bluetooth and does her eye makeup.
As fun as it maybe, I personally see no remotely good reason why someone should ever (short of an emergency) need to be able to cruise at 120 miles per hour.
Forgetting the much worse gas mileage and the extra environmental damage if large numbers of drivers were allowed to cruise at 2 miles per minute. It's dangerous and unnecessary. If you need to get somewhere so quickly, we have planes for that kind of thing.
I have owned some fairly high performance vehicles (including a ZR-1 'Vette and a Lingenfelter engined 440 hp 'Vette) and I have my racing license (though I imagine it has expired). And even I think that top speed should only be for the race track.
As far as I am concerned, every street car should come factory equipped with a device that does not allow speeds in excess of 100 m.p.h..
Other then ego, NOTHING good comes from triple digit speeds on public roads.
Though I am in strong agreement that the masses' driving skills could do with some huge improvements, I just see nothing good coming from 120 m.p.h. speed limits. It does not matter how fuel efficient the engine. If used en masse at those speeds then gasoline consumption would go up hugely. Not to mention enviornmental damage.Why not with a good fuel efficient diesel? Last year when I was on the Bahn we experienced a construction lane closure. Nobody slowed down. Because there were no tailaters, folks just merged and kept the pace, Have you ever been on a US Hwy and had to endure a lane closure? Typically amounts to a two mile slowdown/backup. And how many times did you get cut off if you were trying to maintain a safe distance.
Lingenfelter Performance Engineering. I had a Corvette I used to own modified by them. They told me mine was one of only two convertibles they had worked on up until that point.BTW, what's a Lingenfilter? Hardly sounds stock to me. How would it compare to a Renn Sport Porsche?
Why not with a good fuel efficient diesel? Last year when I was on the Bahn we experienced a construction lane closure. Nobody slowed down. Because there were no tailaters, folks just merged and kept the pace, Have you ever been on a US Hwy and had to endure a lane closure? Typically amounts to a two mile slowdown/backup. And how many times did you get cut off if you were trying to maintain a safe distance.
NASCAR on t.v. is great. They keep you updated on everything and show you things that you can't see in the bleachers. I would never attend a race because i wouldn't know enough of whats going on.
But they can't compete with the NFL... not even close :tongue:. And i really like NASCAR and the concept they have of a playoff system. I first got turned to it when they had a big deal about their new playoff system and i saw Kurt Busch win by about 8/9 points.
They do need to set their rules in stone and stop coming up with shit, I didn't watch the race last week and barely seen the highlights but i've seen them do things like this numerous times.
I wish they had a free channel where you could just get the basics and the racetrack sounds and NO commentators.
I think it has a lot to do with the fact that NASCAR is much less physically demanding on the driver than open wheel racing because of the much slower speeds,less G force and smoother suspension systems.Not to mention that NASCAR has power steering and IRL cars do not.Taking all this into account,a driver can substantially prolong His or Her career by switching to the easier form of racing that NASCAR offers.(Not to suggest that NASCAR does not require skills)--But for the most part,Indy or Formula 1 drivers are much younger drivers and considered an old man at the age of 35,while NASCAR drivers race well into their late 40's and 50's.-Dale Jarrett-50,Ricky Rudd-50,Ward Burton-45,Mark Martin-48,etc.etc.if NASCAR is such a joke, why are so many open wheel champions taking pay cuts to make the jump into the series? And yes, guys like Montoya, Villeneuve, Franchitti, and Hornish Jr. (although his jump to NASCAR is taking a slower path) are taking substantially lower salaries to drive NASCAR.
if NASCAR is such a joke, why are so many open wheel champions taking pay cuts to make the jump into the series? And yes, guys like Montoya, Villeneuve, Franchitti, and Hornish Jr. (although his jump to NASCAR is taking a slower path) are taking substantially lower salaries to drive NASCAR.