The Do As I Say Not As I Do In Politics

Status
Not open for further replies.

Facetious

Moderated
DE - You can only hope to attract the attention of the many thousands of lurkers out there, as nobody is going to budge here, I'm afraid.

I don't have a problem with your threads . . I enjoy reading them actually.
Lots of reasonable dialog in here, aside from a few flare ups here and there. :D

I still think that you're a ways off (on count) on your Obama threads as compared to the "stupid bitch palin" threads though. You probably have some 40 + or so threads to go in order to catch up. :tongue:
 
DE - You can only hope to attract the attention of the many thousands of lurkers out there, as nobody is going to budge here, I'm afraid.

I don't have a problem with your threads . . I enjoy reading them actually.
Lots of reasonable dialog in here, aside from a few flare ups here and there. :D

He,he,he oh man there are very who can breathe fresh air and actually discuss things in here with passion but respectful, others just don't want to get their heads out of the favorites asses. But I "betcha" that time to discuss the issues will be when they want to and when something goes to shit...

Besides if 100% of the folks in here would be only talking about "how good" "hope" and "change" sooner or later they will get bored, they need the ocassional "asshole" that's is upfront enough to dissent with the 98% that is in here.
 
Last edited:
Besides if 100% of the folks in here would be only talking about "how good" "hope" and "change" sooner or later they will get bored, they need the ocassional "asshole" that's is upfront enough to dissent with the 98% that is in here.


I hope you arent serious. Do you think people who are disagreeing with you are all pro-Obama?

It this very case, in this very topic, i see nothing wrong to scrutinize that deeply into people private life, people who will play roles like Ambassador for your country.

If it wasnt Obama but McCain who did that, i would have seen nothing wrong regardless if they have themselves a cleansheet or something in their closet.

If a president, whoever he is, wasnt doing that it would be a reason to be worried. Not the opposite.

I dont think acting this way is hypocrital or else from Obama - its just his job and responsability to do it like it would be for any President-elect, President or whatever status he had.

I'm not pro anyone - im a foreigner - an outside observer - of US politics.
 
If a president, whoever he is, wasnt doing that it would be a reason to be worried. Not the opposite.

I dont think acting this way his hypocrital or else from Obama - its just his job and responsability to do it like it would be for any President-elect, President or whatever status he had.

:hatsoff:

Obama already endured the vetting process on these baseless accusations about his past associations. It was called the election. He passed with flying colors. It isn't an issue any longer (not that it ever was).

There's nothing wrong with a legitimate background check on a prospective employee....it happens every day. Why anyone would try to make some partisan issue out of this is beyond me. It's pretty evident that those of you on the extreme right are going to be examining everything Obama does under a microscope and this has already been discussed ad nauseum. Much ado about absolutely nothing.

:hatsoff:
 
Im worried Don, it seems you have quite a grudge against the President Elect, if something unforseen happens, im going to be watching the news avidly for the statement:

"......and was an avid poster on the popular pornographic message board FreeOnes, where he spent most of his time creating what are called "threads" on how terrible former President Obama was, and it seems to the police that one day he just snapped" :D J/K



We get it, you dont like Obama but those who do like him are not going to be won over to "your side" with this constant barrage of threads atacking him, yes do as you please, its your right to post as many threads on this as you wish, but enough is enough in my opinion. Like I said we get it, cant you continue to post this stuff in one of the other threads you have started.

:hatsoff:
 
Im worried Don, it seems you have quite a grudge against the President Elect, if something unforseen happens, im going to be watching the news avidly for the statement:

"......and was an avid poster on the popular pornographic message board FreeOnes, where he spent most of his time creating what are called "threads" on how terrible former President Obama was, and it seems to the police that one day he just snapped" :D J/K



We get it, you dont like Obama but those who do like him are not going to be won over to "your side" with this constant barrage of threads atacking him, yes do as you please, its your right to post as many threads on this as you wish, but enough is enough in my opinion. Like I said we get it, cant you continue to post this stuff in one of the other threads you have started.

:hatsoff:


Nonsense, never have anything personal against no one, even people like Chef who lied about all my threads and then misquoted me and only provides the thread to my correct comment.

I'll just settle for streaking naked when he takes over in January...just wait for it, you'll see.

Anyways the title of this thread is pretty open to other NON Obama stories.

Not trying to win no one over, never did, never will.
 
I don't think it is a problem that Obama is carefully screening prospective members of his administration. But I can understand how people have different takes on this.

As for don equis criticizing Obama, I think he does go out of his way to do so, but that is his right. If people don't subscribe to the same views as him, just say something to that effect that you disagree. Taking it personal and starting flaming attacks like our friend, LUVbigboobs, was totally uncalled for. Blindly defending Obama with flaming and attacking other members is much worse than regularly criticizing him. At least don equis puts thought into his posts and I for one can usually see where he is coming from, though I generally disagree.

As for what Chef mentioned, I can see where he is coming from too. But I don't think posting this topic in a general "anti-Obama" thread is necessary. This thread highlighted a particular news story and subject that was new to the board discussion.

In any event, let's not fight. On this board, we often "agree to disagree". In continuing to do that, we'll no doubt have some good discussions.
 

Torre82

Moderator \ Jannie
Staff member
Anyways the title of this thread is pretty open to other NON Obama stories.

Not trying to win no one over, never did, never will.

The title.. the posts... it's all about you sniveling and replying back with the exact opposite.

When you're called whiny, you call us deluded.

Called a repub, you say you're not in any party.

Called out for losing friends, you say that was never the point - you dont care about friends.

Called for bashing Obama, you say the title of the thread is pretty obvious.. we dont have to talk about Obama.

Someone gets passionate, you say dont get personal.

Someone gets personal, you say their head is up Obama's ass.

Do you ever actually answer questions or just deflect them? You dont need a shrink.. you need a nailgun to the head. Repeatedly. Yer shit is tiresome, your opinion has been noted so many times that half the board knows you're an asshole with an attention problem. NEW THREAD! OLD ARGUMENT!

Go steal one of your children's ritalin and leave everyone else alone.
 
The title.. the posts... it's all about you sniveling and replying back with the exact opposite.

When you're called whiny, you call us deluded.

Called a repub, you say you're not in any party.

Called out for losing friends, you say that was never the point - you dont care about friends.

Called for bashing Obama, you say the title of the thread is pretty obvious.. we dont have to talk about Obama.

Someone gets passionate, you say dont get personal.

Someone gets personal, you say their head is up Obama's ass.

Do you ever actually answer questions or just deflect them? You dont need a shrink.. you need a nailgun to the head. Repeatedly. Yer shit is tiresome, your opinion has been noted so many times that half the board knows you're an asshole with an attention problem. NEW THREAD! OLD ARGUMENT!

Go steal one of your children's ritalin and leave everyone else alone.

Dude you are an idiot, that's the answer than folks like you only deserve, don't waste my time with personal attacks, you are angry and spitting your hateful rethoric at your pc screen, so unless you have anything smart to refute any genuine article that I post (with a link so yer lazzy candy ass don't have to look for it) you need to turn around and get the fuck out of this thread, I am done with shit like yours, offer no solution, nothing solid to the discussions, just stupidic imbecile comments. Yeah yer head is so far up Obama's ass that anything you talk is pure shit.. Now going back to the subject:

Audit: Sharpton campaign owes US nearly $500,000

WASHINGTON – Federal auditors have concluded the Rev. Al Sharpton's 2004 campaign owes the government nearly $500,000 for illegal donations and other financial improprieties. Sharpton has been feuding with the Federal Election Commission for years over his accounting in his failed run for president, for which he received $100,000 in so-called government matching funds that authorities later concluded he did not deserve because he hadn't followed campaign laws.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081115/ap_on_go_ot/sharpton_finances;_ylt=Apw83d9fnpXt4hrYQ7quvwoGw_IE

The party that boasted fiscal responsibility and small goverment, kinda ate their own words:

The Grand Old Spending Party: How Republicans Became Big Spenders

President Bush has presided over the largest overall increase in inflation-adjusted federal spending since Lyndon B. Johnson. Even after excluding spending on defense and homeland security, Bush is still the biggest-spending president in 30 years. His 2006 budget doesn’t cut enough spending to change his place in history, either.

Total government spending grew by 33 percent during Bush’s first term. The federal budget as a share of the economy grew from 18.5 percent of GDP on Clinton’s last day in office to 20.3 percent by the end of Bush’s first term.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3750

Republicans Become the Party of Big Government

Even before the release of the new federal budget, President Bush's budget chief Josh Bolten has begun the damage control. On one flank, the president is trying to ward off the increasing despair in his conservative base caused by his huge spending increases and big deficits. On another flank, the mainstream media are beginning to run front-page stories on the administration's fiscal irresponsibility.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=2519
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top