But has she been active as recently as 2010, isn't that your question? Seems to me you're assuming she has, but you're looking for info on what that activity consists of.
So I guess the real question is why you believe she has been active as recently as 2010, and I'm guessing it's the 'Dates Active' listed on her iafd.com page, or something similar. If that's true, then I believe the answer is that iafd defines a star's "active" years as those with new films are released (otherwise, they would have to update all stars' active years manually every year as new films are released). But if you look at the films released in those years, I think you'll find they're all compilations with re-released scenes.
In other words, the drawback of defining active years this way is that just because a star is listed as having been active in a given year, doesn't mean she was actually shooting in those years. That's how it would be defined in an ideal world, but that information is rarely available.
