Suspect in Nazi trial proud of his SS service
- Thread starter Will E Worm
- Start date
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
GregCentauro
Banned
:1orglaugh Princess Margaret was a brilliant golfer,. She's still three strokes ahead of me.
It's good that he is finally being tried for war crimes. I hope Bush gets tried for war crimes too
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
actually my 2 uncles on my fathers side fought in europe, one of them is seen clear as day in a front page newspaper photo marching into france during the celebration on the day it was liberated.
Myuncle on my mothers side was shot twice, once in the arm, once in the shoulder in the battle of the bulge. I didnt do shit,i wasnt born yet.
again, i'm not saying this guy shouldnt be tried, i wasnt there nor were any of you.
but unlike most of you I don't let the word nazi affect my judgement without knowing what happened.
civillians can be killed when aiding the enemy during war. this might be the case here, we dont know.
And he did say he WAS proud when he got accepted, not that he killed any innocent people.
and by alot of people here's logic, why dont we kill all nazi soldiers who fought during wwii, hell why didnt we do it in 1945?
kill all the japanese also, everybody who was in the republican gaurd under saddam, all the vichy french. koreans,kill all people in the south for losing the civil war., and why not kill those guys in guantanamo bay ect ect ect.
Lets just hope we never lose one.
But I know, I'm a nazi and so was were m
y uncles, hope you feel better now.
Mob mentality, dont know the facts just shout kill kill kill just because of a word.
Myuncle on my mothers side was shot twice, once in the arm, once in the shoulder in the battle of the bulge. I didnt do shit,i wasnt born yet.
again, i'm not saying this guy shouldnt be tried, i wasnt there nor were any of you.
but unlike most of you I don't let the word nazi affect my judgement without knowing what happened.
civillians can be killed when aiding the enemy during war. this might be the case here, we dont know.
And he did say he WAS proud when he got accepted, not that he killed any innocent people.
and by alot of people here's logic, why dont we kill all nazi soldiers who fought during wwii, hell why didnt we do it in 1945?
kill all the japanese also, everybody who was in the republican gaurd under saddam, all the vichy french. koreans,kill all people in the south for losing the civil war., and why not kill those guys in guantanamo bay ect ect ect.
Lets just hope we never lose one.
But I know, I'm a nazi and so was were m
y uncles, hope you feel better now.
Mob mentality, dont know the facts just shout kill kill kill just because of a word.
Mr P you need to click the link.He was convicted decades ago and had admitted the killings.He is a war criminal who just got away from justice.
"Boere admitted the three killings to Dutch authorities when he was in captivity after the war but managed to escape from his POW camp and eventually return to Germany.
He was sentenced to death in the Netherlands in 1949 - later commuted to life imprisonment - but Boere has managed to avoid jail so far."
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091127/D9C7TVFG0.html
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
ok if he was convicted why is there now another trial?
not aimed at you friday butttttt,
I'm big on innocent until proven guilty, the right to trial.
so during the war he was a prisoner in a pow camp the netherlands, where he according to them, admitted killings. the killings of 3 of their people.
he was convicted and sentenced to death.
was there a trial? we dont know
what were the circumstances of the killings which happened during the war? were these people working against the germans? we dont know.
admitting something or being said to admit something while in a pow camp? could it be possible a confession was cohersed or biased based on emotions of the time ? we dont know.
so now he's on trial and we know nothing other than "he was proud when he was chosen for the ss", at 18 years of age.
So its automatically "kill him, he's a nazi"
doesnt that put us in the same mindset of what the germans have been said to have done to the jews?
"kill him he's a jew'?
let the guy have a fair trial and if he killed innocent civillians guilty, if he was following orders or killed people working against the germans during a time of war, not guilty.
emotion or hatred or the fact that he was a german soldier has nothing to do with it.
A little off topic but alot of the same people, most who werent there or know very little about 1930's or 40's germany's real history will defend terrorists rights to trial until their tongues bleed, but when they hear the word nazi they automatically scream "kill him"
whats up with that?
And wheres the anger and pursuit of japanese soldiers who did much sicker shit than the germans on a much larger scale?
hell they used to flay people alive, burn groups alive, mostly women, mutilate babies,kill little girls after they cum while raping them, and all kinds of other sick shit, just for fun. and many of the soldiers till this day when speaking about it laugh like it was fuckin funny.......the anger is only towards the nazis, ask yourselves why that is.
double standard? hell yes, but why?
I'm not defend the nazi party, just the right to trial without predjudice and exposing double standards and selective enragement.
not aimed at you friday butttttt,
I'm big on innocent until proven guilty, the right to trial.
so during the war he was a prisoner in a pow camp the netherlands, where he according to them, admitted killings. the killings of 3 of their people.
he was convicted and sentenced to death.
was there a trial? we dont know
what were the circumstances of the killings which happened during the war? were these people working against the germans? we dont know.
admitting something or being said to admit something while in a pow camp? could it be possible a confession was cohersed or biased based on emotions of the time ? we dont know.
so now he's on trial and we know nothing other than "he was proud when he was chosen for the ss", at 18 years of age.
So its automatically "kill him, he's a nazi"
doesnt that put us in the same mindset of what the germans have been said to have done to the jews?
"kill him he's a jew'?
let the guy have a fair trial and if he killed innocent civillians guilty, if he was following orders or killed people working against the germans during a time of war, not guilty.
emotion or hatred or the fact that he was a german soldier has nothing to do with it.
A little off topic but alot of the same people, most who werent there or know very little about 1930's or 40's germany's real history will defend terrorists rights to trial until their tongues bleed, but when they hear the word nazi they automatically scream "kill him"
whats up with that?
And wheres the anger and pursuit of japanese soldiers who did much sicker shit than the germans on a much larger scale?
hell they used to flay people alive, burn groups alive, mostly women, mutilate babies,kill little girls after they cum while raping them, and all kinds of other sick shit, just for fun. and many of the soldiers till this day when speaking about it laugh like it was fuckin funny.......the anger is only towards the nazis, ask yourselves why that is.
double standard? hell yes, but why?
I'm not defend the nazi party, just the right to trial without predjudice and exposing double standards and selective enragement.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
double post damit, excuse me.
but why is the western word so obsessed with nazis and not the japanese for example?
Is it the fact that the victims of the japanese were "just chinese" and the victims of the germans were better people?
Or is it that the germans are white anglos? And the japanese were "an honorable people"? Maybe?
And germans killed alot of different people, poles, gypsys, russians, mongols, slavs, jews, ect.
why is it that its holocaust this and holocaust that.
why is it that every hollywood wwii movie is about the jews?
why are the millions of other victims never mentioned?
Is it that jews were more valuable and better than the other victims of the nazis?
again , whats up with that?
but why is the western word so obsessed with nazis and not the japanese for example?
Is it the fact that the victims of the japanese were "just chinese" and the victims of the germans were better people?
Or is it that the germans are white anglos? And the japanese were "an honorable people"? Maybe?
And germans killed alot of different people, poles, gypsys, russians, mongols, slavs, jews, ect.
why is it that its holocaust this and holocaust that.
why is it that every hollywood wwii movie is about the jews?
why are the millions of other victims never mentioned?
Is it that jews were more valuable and better than the other victims of the nazis?
again , whats up with that?
Supafly
Retired Mod
And how come the USA, UK, France and Soviet Union did not and do net get trialed for putting Ex-Nazis into government jobs after WW 2?
And why doesn't GW Bush and Tony Blair get hanger for making War in Iraq on ters of saying:
Give us all of the weapons of mass destruction which we now do no they know he never had. He could not give them that and they both knew. So it was not about those WoMDs. So it was about wanting to invade and eventually kill thousands of Soldiers AND Civilians in a giant war crime.
So we should trial and hang every US and ohter soldier involved, right?
Follow your own logic and start hanging those criminals, as you formulate it.
And why doesn't GW Bush and Tony Blair get hanger for making War in Iraq on ters of saying:
Give us all of the weapons of mass destruction which we now do no they know he never had. He could not give them that and they both knew. So it was not about those WoMDs. So it was about wanting to invade and eventually kill thousands of Soldiers AND Civilians in a giant war crime.
So we should trial and hang every US and ohter soldier involved, right?
Follow your own logic and start hanging those criminals, as you formulate it.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
^ Oh my god a german!
He must be a nazi, kill him!
back off sudadupfly, i'm american i can handle this on my own.
note: i hope my sarcasm was not lost in translation, i agree with you supadupa, good comparison.
He must be a nazi, kill him!
back off sudadupfly, i'm american i can handle this on my own.
note: i hope my sarcasm was not lost in translation, i agree with you supadupa, good comparison.
Ace Bandage
The one and only.
That's not grammar, genius. That's reading comprehension. Grammar is knowing the difference between a participle or a gerund or determining whether a verb is transitive or intransitive. Comprehension is reading something and ascertaining the main idea. If you're going to claim to be doing something (even though you're actually not) then at least use the right term.
I'm sorry, but it's impossible to take anything that you say seriously. You're further to the right than Limbaugh and all of your arguments look like they were constructed by a group of teenage girls. You're basically an equivalent of Archie Bunker - complete with racial ideology.
PlasmaTwa2
The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
Yes, the true goal of the Iraq War: To invade and kill thousands of soldiers and civilians for the sake of commiting a war crime.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
look here meathead,
is = present tense
was = past tense
that is grammar.
reading comprehension is understanding complete sentences.
so were both right.
the basic teenage girl style , right wing racist argument i made was :
"let the guy have a fair trial and if he killed innocent civillians guilty, if he was following orders or killed people working against the germans during a time of war, not guilty.
emotion or hatred or the fact that he was a german soldier has nothing to do with it."
Oh but you heard the word nazi and that changed everything.
and if you actually read my posts on many topics here you should be able to see that i am not what you say i am, that is if your reading comprehension is ample.
dude, i dont want to fight, i am a peacable chap, i just think i'm seeing this in a bigger scope than you are.
supadupa made a good point, if their were no wmd's in iraq then the invasion was an act of agression, a completely unwarranted takeover of a country.
just like the germans did right?
so shouldn't we now charge every US soldier, every soldier actually who was there and killed someone or even fired their weapon with a crime against humanity or no because no nazis were involved?
is = present tense
was = past tense
that is grammar.
reading comprehension is understanding complete sentences.
so were both right.
the basic teenage girl style , right wing racist argument i made was :
"let the guy have a fair trial and if he killed innocent civillians guilty, if he was following orders or killed people working against the germans during a time of war, not guilty.
emotion or hatred or the fact that he was a german soldier has nothing to do with it."
Oh but you heard the word nazi and that changed everything.
and if you actually read my posts on many topics here you should be able to see that i am not what you say i am, that is if your reading comprehension is ample.
dude, i dont want to fight, i am a peacable chap, i just think i'm seeing this in a bigger scope than you are.
supadupa made a good point, if their were no wmd's in iraq then the invasion was an act of agression, a completely unwarranted takeover of a country.
just like the germans did right?
so shouldn't we now charge every US soldier, every soldier actually who was there and killed someone or even fired their weapon with a crime against humanity or no because no nazis were involved?
Nicely said D-Rock. :hatsoff:
Supafly
Retired Mod
Here's a little documentary, I suppose you watch it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4D8oJYuH4s
The sad - or rather furiating - fact is that it is all about the natural ressources of another country. It is an colonial war.
And the warmongers arr the bad guys. Feel proud of being a part of that?
Why don't you go and try to make your country a force of peace onstead bringing death and terror to other countries you want to exploit?
PlasmaTwa2
The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
Are you still talking to me? Cause I am confused as hell.
If you are referring to me in all that... I'm Canadian, ****. We are not in Iraq, and I doubt you will find a country that is more peaceful then us.
:dunno:
Last edited by a moderator:
Supafly
Retired Mod
Okay.
You want to get insulting. That's showing you are irrational.
When you are not even an US-American, why come you defend their policy? Feel sympathetic to a country that uses their armed forces and their foreign intelligence agencies to still act as a colonial bully?
Similar threads
