Suggestion: personal babes blacklist

[gregorykh]

I've come across a problem - it's hard to remember the names of the babes I didn't like. The thumbnails leading to their pages are sometimes delicious. I come across babes I saw once and didn't like - look at the thumb - think "mmm, interesting" - open their pages - start swearing 'cause I ****** my time (i've already seen her but the fuzzy thumbnail worked as a bait).

I think that an anti-fav option should be added - an option to exclude particular babes from all search results. Optionally to exclude them from the suggestions (ads) on the fields of the page. Leave them for new, unrated or favourite babes.
You mark some babe 'ignore' and you never see her on the site. You can unmark her anytime.

The merits are:
1. My Freeones becomes really "My" without those babes I will never want to see.
2. Possibility of creating an anti-rating.
3. Clarifying results of existing ratings. (Many visits to the girls' pages are misclicks - you never know if the user liked her or he just fell for the thumbnail).

 

[Petra]

Interesting idea, but this isn't something we're considering right now. People can just not add them to their favorites.

But out of curiosity, where are you clicking on the thumbnails.

Oh, and ratings aren't based only on clicks. It's part of the equation, but star rating, activity on a girl's babe section, searches and loads of other things go into the rank system. ;-)

 

[gregorykh]

But out of curiosity, where are you clicking on the thumbnails.

I search a keyword, "star" for example. The search engine returns a list with babes having the word "star" in their names.
When I hover my mouse over some name in the list a thumbnail appears. If I like the girl on the thumb I go to her section to study links.

 

[Automate]

I have made a very quick-and-dirty Premium Link Upgrade filter script that does some blacklisting for the models whose content I don't want to see and for some content categories as well. It's not in a stage that I could publish it though, I'd have to clean it up a lot. It's certainly not easy to use either. All maintenance for the content filters has to be done manually by editing the script.

 

[Automate]

Have to ask an additional question: what would the FreeOnes team members think about the possibility of publishing Greasemonkey scripts somewhere that would allow for this kind of functionality (and other sorts of site customization as well)? As the programmers among you know, Greasemonley scripts are JavaScript and thus run strictly on the client side (that is, the browser).

Well, server-side JavaScript does exist, but it's not possible to do within Greasemonley.

 

[gregorykh]

I double the request.

 

[Petra]

Sorry guys, this just isn't something we're considering at the moment.

 

[gregorykh]

A year passed. I still dream of excluding ugly girls (rated 1 star by me) from my search results/babe section.

PS
The dropdown menu on the main page (Babes->Latest Babes) seized to drop down. You have to click Babes and only there the menu starts working i.e. grants access to the Latest Babes button. I'm on Chrome. Dunno if it's alright, but the button was available some time ago.

 

[Petra]

A year passed. I still dream of excluding ugly girls (rated 1 star by me) from my search results/babe section.

PS
The dropdown menu on the main page (Babes->Latest Babes) seized to drop down. You have to click Babes and only there the menu starts working i.e. grants access to the Latest Babes button. I'm on Chrome. Dunno if it's alright, but the button was available some time ago.

What is the domain you're on when the dropdown stops working??

I use chrome and it works for me.

 

[gregorykh]

Start page of freeones.com keeps redirecting me to freeones.ru
When I click "Babes" button (on the ru-domain) I'm redirected back to freeones.com and the dropdown menu works fine.

 

[Petra]

Start page of freeones.com keeps redirecting me to freeones.ru
When I click "Babes" button (on the ru-domain) I'm redirected back to freeones.com and the dropdown menu works fine.

This is a known issue we've been working on and yours has been added to the list. Hopefully it will get solved soon.