Study concludes that Hillary Clinton received at least 835,000 votes by non citizens
- Thread starter Jack Davenport
- Start date
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Notice that people thought Trump would have dropped the voter fraud thing if he won the election. Now we have the same people saying ego is the motivation. How about Trump making voter fraud an issue of his campaign? Here he is acting on this because it is a real issue. People have been prosecuted over the years but doesn't make the news as an issue. Now he is bringing this thing to light and let the press do due diligence to pursue this. Does this illegal fraud practice swing national elections? No, but it sure as can in local elections. I think this is the point of his issue.
I hope that this is limited to the privileges of legal citizens. The problem is that there is no national registry of voters and I don't want that. It's up to the states to regulate that stuff.
I hope that this is limited to the privileges of legal citizens. The problem is that there is no national registry of voters and I don't want that. It's up to the states to regulate that stuff.
Seems you did not read m last sentence so...
My problem with US voter ID laws is that many US citizens don't have a photo ID and would have to pay for getting one.
If you can make sure that no non-citizens would vote but every single citizens would be able to, without having to pay anything, then go. But if a law designed to prevent non-citizens to vote would also forbid some citizens that right, then you shouldn't, under any circumstances, pass such a law.
Democrats are opposed to a national ID.
Even a free one to anyone that is a citizen.
Because..Nazis
Formed the CIA
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Lets leave Prescott Bush out of this
So, you're accepting that the study that is the subject of this entire thread is bullshit? I assume that's why you stopped talking about it and just tossed all this random irrelevant bullshit here?
"Welp, nothing related to add, I'll just toss out some chaff and hope some of that becomes the topic."
Several of your points are right, your blithering idiot in chief and the republicans are going to do a ton of damage to the USA before the patriots get their shit together. Hopefully it won't be too long, the women's march had about 10 times as many people as the tea party rallies of 09.
But even if they don't, I don't need a blankie. Like I keep telling you, you fucking idiot, I'm out here in the free world, where you and your dear leader are ridiculed.
Also, there's no system republicans won't pervert to their advantage. That's how you end up with bs like in Texas, where a concealed handgun license is acceptable ID to vote with, but not a university issued student ID. Not to mention shutting down or reducing the hours of DMVs in poor (ie "ethnic") neighbourhoods.
Can you have a university issued student ID and not be eligible to vote?
No dumbfuck, I am not accepting that it is bullshit. The professor conducting the study said that Trump grossly misinterpreted the study to conclude that 3-5 million illegals voted for someone other than him.
But, he said that over 800,00O DID.
Well that is a lot of votes for something that doesn't happen as the left keep claiming.
The guy is even a liberal himself.
You suck, your opinions suck, your accuracy sucks. Australia sucks. Eat a bowl of dicks.
Awwww, don't be sad bubba. You know full well Australia is awesome and you're just jealous. We have freedom, and security, and stability, and best of all, no republicans!!!!
artysml:
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Johan. in USA we frown on nationalization. Our constitution limits the power of the federal government. It is up to the states to issue birth certificates. It's not even mandatory to have a social security number. Granted that we are not living in the 1700's anymore and convenience of these documents are necessary for lots of stuff but not federally mandated. And that goes for voting too. Many states only need a form filled out with proof of address. That can be in the form of a simple piece of mail postmarked and sent to your address. Getting a national is more complicated. Even if it costs the applicant nothing, it is intrusive and someone has to pay for the bureaucracy and clerical stuff.
At least, something very valid I agree with you
Awwww, don't be sad bubba. You know full well Australia is awesome and you're just jealous. We have freedom, and security, and stability, and best of all, no republicans!!!!
And some extremely hot ladies!!!!
Similar threads
