Scoreland

was gonna post this in the review section but figured i might get my ass whooped!

What is it with scoreland?...how the feck do they make women look so godarn ugly (not always the case i will admit) their photographers are awful and jesus some of those background props belong in the 80s

end of rant
 
You ain't kidding, the models are usually plumpers, the pictures grainy, and all these shitty floral outfits and backgrounds beffitting the set of Oprah.
 

Kingfisher

Here Zombie, Zombie, Zombie...
I think it's just thier choice of set design or photographer, they choose to not pay for decent photogs so that's what you get. But I still check it out.
 

member006

Closed Account
was gonna post this in the review section but figured i might get my ass whooped!

What is it with scoreland?...how the feck do they make women look so godarn ugly (not always the case i will admit) their photographers are awful and jesus some of those background props belong in the 80s

end of rant

Two things answer this I think.

1. Amateur all the way. Low budget.

2. If you don't like it don't bitch about it. Simply go somewhere else. duh!

Now was that hard? :dunno:

LL

P.S. If anyone else picks on you call me, I got your back. :D
 
yeah, something about their lighting is horrible. it's like they put oil on a girl, put her in a white room and call it a set.
 
yeah, something about their lighting is horrible. it's like they put oil on a girl, put her in a white room and call it a set.

Exactly. And as we all know, it isn't a set until you have a fluffer, a candy dish full of cocaine, and a creepy 53 year old man calling the shots :thumbsup:
 
i hear you :)...
dont get me wrong accessspecialex....i do like some of it too...but it just made me think....theres people on that site, lets just say for example linsey dawn mckenzie, who are fairly good looking, yet most people wouldnt agree with that comment, least not on here...
However in my opinion, if she was on another site with half decent photographers then i really do believe it would be a different story. Look at it the other way too, compare the first shots of Bea Flora for busty.pl to the score stuff....its good cause shes hot...but its no where near the quality of busty.pl
as for the amateur thing....thats horse crap...plenty of other amateur sites out there and they seem to manage just fine

oh and lady love....its not possible to avoid scoreland...they say the internet is something like 90% porn....well i reckon 80% of that is scoreland!! :>
 
Some people are fans of the big titties, and some aren't. Most of the big tit pornstars are well-aged, so I guess it's just not your thing. =P
 
Fuller women, not just breasts ...

Scoreland caters to fuller women, not just breasts. They have different magazines or sections in magazines that cater to natural or plumpers as well.

I agree they don't always show women in their most glamourous state at all times. Then again, I like their natura approach, without all the airbrushing in many cases.

And sometimes, the women are just very, very full figured but very, very slender and fit! And damn if they don't have perfect hourglass figures and wide, large breasts as well.

My favorite type of lover.
 
I wish Score would do more Interracial. I know they cater to a white male audience, but there are a lot of black men like me that read their mags/view their website.

A lot of their models do IR for other companys.

Peace.
 
I wish Score would do more Interracial. I know they cater to a white male audience, but there are a lot of black men like me that read their mags/view their website.

A lot of their models do IR for other companys.

Peace.


Its good that you brought this up. I'm white, but it wouldn't bother me in the slightest to see IR.
 
I consider my taste in porn fairly diverse but my one go to mag is always score. If people don't like their models they don't have to look. There seems to be a whole lot of models who don't look a day over twelve sucking off some wierdo with a third leg and people seem to really love that. I would say that it is a safe bet that your score fans are not fans of that garbage. Not that there is anything wrong with that, its just a matter of preferance. Score shows full figured women in settings that they might acutually be in so the viewer actually imagine him/herself there. In my opinion it is the best viewing experiance in porn.
 
I like fullfigured women that have big natural breasts and big natural butts. Nonetheless, I do like looking at slim women with breast implants.

As far as Scoreland is concerned, I don't subscribe to their magazine. I tend to look for free porn online over buying porno mags.

A piece of advice my granddad told me:
"If you don't like something, find something else you might like." It's just that simple.
 
ack!...its not the fact of whether i like the women or not!!!
i was just bitching about their lack of photography skills!
i like the full figured women approach and the lack-o-photoshop (even though they probably should in moderation!). I do look at scoreland galleries at times...and have even been a paid member of their site at one point (big mistake..they screwed with my bank card!) i like the women on there.

Bangbros shows their women in natural surroundings (and has the occasional full figured woman), and their 10x the photographers/videographers(is that a word?) that scoreland are!

however if i wanted to look at a hot full figured chick that was taking her clothes off at my grandmas house then i'll go to scoreland :)

this might be insulting but for the folks that like the photography....do your houses look like that?
if i were one of those models i'd feel pretty insulted you think thats the kinda environment i live in! :)
 
Top