technically speaking though, isn't Kim Kardashian a " porn star"?
not a single problemI have a question for some of you who are parents. As a parent would you have a problem with her reading to your kid?
The anti-sex attitudes on this thread are rather revealing and surprising, considering what this site is all about - where the fuck do you people think all those little kids came from anyway? The stork?
The pictures tell the story - she was reading to the kids. She wasn't grooming them for a career in porn. She was reading to them - and seemed to be doing a good job, since they look pretty engaged.
And, yeah, she looks great as well. Good for her!
If people can't see that it isn't just about "A woman reading to the class" then theyre either ignorant or full of shit.
The only reason kids would find out what she did for a living is because people like you and their parents are making a big deal out of it. You're creating a scenario because you want to be upset with something, not surprising by the way. Kids pay attention to what is around them and when their parents are going crazy over a visitor, then they will be curious. There's some simple logic for you and if you can't see that then you are "fucked in the head"!"Ok Students, Today we have a special treat. SashaGray is gonna read DR. suess to you".
"Who's SashaGrey Ms. Chokesondick?".
"Sashagrey is a pornographic actress children. She's famous for deepthroats, gangbangs, double and triple penetration,
ass to mouth, and the dirty sanchez".
"what's ass to mouth Ms. Chokesondick?".
"Its where a woman takes a mans dick in her ass then sucks the shit off it with her mouth Johnny".
Look all you people defending this.
These are little kids, practically babies....they don't even know what sex is let alone be intentionally exposed to it by the school.
And this defense of , " Oh well sex is normal", "Oh so what", "Who cares what she does for a living", "Oh its only DR Suess". is irresponsible as you can get.
THESE ARE VERY YOUNG CHILDREN. THey don't need to be exposed to PORN at such a young age.
purposely putting a well known porn actress, and a very hardcore one at that in a classroom showing her off to the class as if theyre not gonna find out who she is and what she does is a cop out.
This is exposing kids to porn, not actually showing them a video but exposing them to what it is........That's not good.
"Oh well they don't know who she is". Bullshit.
If they weren't already told they will all find out.
Little kids just don't need to be exposed to that.
They shouldn't be exposed to porn at any level and putting SASGAGREY PORNSTAR OF THE YEAR in the class with them is exposing them to it, no matter how you want to twist it it still is.
If anybody can't see the simple logic of that then theyre fucked in the head.
The only reason kids would find out what she did for a living is because people like you and their parents are making a big deal out of it. You're creating a scenario because you want to be upset with something, not surprising by the way. Kids pay attention to what is around them and when their parents are going crazy over a visitor, then they will be curious. There's some simple logic for you and if you can't see that then you are "fucked in the head"!
Another cop out.
"Anti-sex"?
There is no anti-sex being spoken about here, none at all.
Youre right this site is about sex for the most part, and people do fuck.
We are all adults and have made the decision to be here but that's got nothing to do with this topic.
If people can't see that it isn't just about "A woman reading to the class" then theyre either ignorant or full of shit.
My points in my former post are just.
Very young little kids in those pics.
Would you feel the same if it were max hardcore reading to them?
I have a question for some of you who are parents. As a parent would you have a problem with her reading to your kid?
The anti-sex attitudes on this thread are rather revealing and surprising, considering what this site is all about - where the fuck do you people think all those little kids came from anyway? The stork?
I don't see what the big deal is. Its not like she arrived at the school with someones dick in her mouth....she's dressed conservatively and was simply giving storytime to the kids. Because she's fucked on film, it makes her a bad role model, but to who? The kids shouldn't know who the hell she is - if the childrens parents were any kind of parent, the family computer would be monitored. So as far as the kids know, she's just a pretty lady who's good at reading them stories.
If Michael Vick showed up to read to kids, people would probably applaud him for doing a good job - and he's a CRIMINAL. Just because she happens to have an unconventional job, doesn't mean that she shouldn't be allowed to volunteer and give back to the community. She's still a human being.
No, theyre gonna find out because she is A FAMOUS PORN ACTRESS.
Again, I can't see the reason for exposing kids to PORNOGRAPHY on any level.
Think a little harder. Think differently.
None of us is 'anti-sex'. You've totally missed the point.