Sarah Palin caught with crib notes on her hand

[Crazy4theBrat]

Shhhh Mega.....he was on a roll!

I was waiting for him to go with the ol' reliable "Did we quit when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor" conclusion.....

(Some might argue that Dubya didn't beat Al Gore, either, but was handed the..oh, here it is, from wiki even: The election was noteworthy for a controversy over the awarding of Florida's 25 electoral votes, the subsequent recount process in that state, and the unusual event of the winning candidate having received fewer popular votes than the runner-up.[1] It was the closest election since 1876 and only the fourth election in which the electoral vote did not reflect the popular vote. )

Yeah, yeah, yeah, and Kennedy had his people stuff the ballot boxes in Chicago... They both won. It's ancient history. Both sides need to grow up and get over it.

I respect you titsrock. I know you can come up with something better than that.

 

[Hot Mega]

The point of my post was not so much to take a petty shot at Obama, but rather, to point out that it would be nice if the liberal media could find something a little more substantive to discuss other than Sarah Palin's notes.

The "liberal" media is focusing on this? The same "liberal" media who focuses on Obama's use of teleprompters? Or the same "liberal" media who made Obama's loose affiliation with some college professor who did something 40 years ago a central point of investigation during the election?? I mean I could go on....

The same holds true for us right wingers and President Obama. While I don't think I agree with most of his political ideas, but he is an intelligent man, and he IS the President, and for these reasons he deserves my attention and respectful introspection when he has something to say. George W. Bush certainly never seemed to get much of that from the overwhelming majority of democrats.

Patently untrue. Demos lined up in lock step behind GWB after 9/11. (Would that happen in a similar situation with Obama of GOPers??? Hell no. They would try and impeach the guy if they could. As it stands they're blaming him for the Xmas day attempt.) Even against their own intuition they supported his ill fated designed to invade Iraq. Even after the scheme was found to be without merit they supported his supplements to the budget to fund it time and time again....

The claim against Demos of Bush is totally baseless IMO.

Maybe we could all start a new trend and find out which things we agree on and work from there.

Maybe you should have voted for Obama then since he was the only candidate saying that very thing.:dunno:

 

[power-san]

do you need notes to do your factory job?

No factory job here, but if I did I'd probably need notes to ensure quality inspections are done correctly. :hatsoff:
P.S. I love you

 

[knowone]

Her supporters should be happy the notes didn't say:
Left foot forward
Chew <gum>
Right foot forward
Chew
Repeat

 

[Ravenholm]

Too bad it wasn't my jizz on her hand

DAMMIT! :scream:

You beat me to it. I was going to say this lol.

 

[Crazy4theBrat]

The "liberal" media is focusing on this? The same "liberal" media who focuses on Obama's use of teleprompters? Or the same "liberal" media who made Obama's loose affiliation with some college professor who did something 40 years ago a central point of investigation during the election?? I mean I could go on....

No, that would be the conservative media. There IS a conservative media. It just isn't near as big as the liberal media. It is made up of most talk radio shows and Fox news. I agree with you on their focusing of Obama's use of teleprompters. It's nothing but game playing, and a total waste of time. Nothing but politics as usual. It's as petty as making an issue of Sarah Palin's hand notes. Neither one is even worth talking about, in my opinion.

Patently untrue. Demos lined up in lock step behind GWB after 9/11. (Would that happen in a similar situation with Obama of GOPers??? Hell no. They would try and impeach the guy if they could. As it stands they're blaming him for the Xmas day attempt.) Even against their own intuition they supported his ill fated designed to invade Iraq. Even after the scheme was found to be without merit they supported his supplements to the budget to fund it time and time again....

If our country sustained an attack on the level of 911, and Obama felt that we should respond with military force, I have no reason to believe that the Republicans would be stupid enough NOT to support Obama's decision.

The same held true with the Democrats for Bush. To do so would label them as crooked politicians who put their party interests above what is important for the country. This would hold true for either side in this situation. You almost have to band together and show a united front, no matter who is the Commander in Chief at the moment. There would be too much public sentiment against doing anythig else.

The claim against Demos of Bush is totally baseless IMO.

Actually, in this part of my post, I was talking about the democratic voters, not the elected officials. You have to admit that democrats - yourself included probably, were completely against 99% of everything Bush did almost from the moment he was elected. I agree that the election was a close one, and I probably would have felt the same if it had happened the other way around, but it doesn't change the fact that Bush got very little support from the democratic voters.

Maybe you should have voted for Obama then since he was the only candidate saying that very thing. :dunno:

I agree with Obama on this. My main reason for not voting for him, and for voting repulican, was because I'm a big advocate of having less government interference in our lives. At the time, I got the impression that he was more of a big government guy, which is more the democrat way of thinking. So far, that's what he has turned out to be.

For the record, I do like the tax cuts he just implemented for small businesses. Why any republican can complain about that is beyond my comprehension. The cuts may not have been as deep as they would have liked, but something is better than nothing. I try to give credit where credit is due.

 

[freejames]

Looks like Sarah was caught with something else in her hand...

 

[Hot Mega]

No, that would be the conservative media. There IS a conservative media. It just isn't near as big as the liberal media. It is made up of most talk radio shows and Fox news. I agree with you on their focusing of Obama's use of teleprompters. It's nothing but game playing, and a total waste of time. Nothing but politics as usual. It's as petty as making an issue of Sarah Palin's hand notes. Neither one is even worth talking about, in my opinion.

If our country sustained an attack on the level of 911, and Obama felt that we should respond with military force, I have no reason to believe that the Republicans would be stupid enough NOT to support Obama's decision.

The same held true with the Democrats for Bush. To do so would label them as crooked politicians who put their party interests above what is important for the country. This would hold true for either side in this situation. You almost have to band together and show a united front, no matter who is the Commander in Chief at the moment. There would be too much public sentiment against doing anythig else.

Actually, in this part of my post, I was talking about the democratic voters, not the elected officials. You have to admit that democrats - yourself included probably, were completely against 99% of everything Bush did almost from the moment he was elected. I agree that the election was a close one, and I probably would have felt the same if it had happened the other way around, but it doesn't change the fact that Bush got very little support from the democratic voters.

I agree with Obama on this. My main reason for not voting for him, and for voting repulican, was because I'm a big advocate of having less government interference in our lives. At the time, I got the impression that he was more of a big government guy, which is more the democrat way of thinking. So far, that's what he has turned out to be.

For the record, I do like the tax cuts he just implemented for small businesses. Why any republican can complain about that is beyond my comprehension. The cuts may not have been as deep as they would have liked, but something is better than nothing. I try to give credit where credit is due.

No need for much of a response to this other than to say of course the electorate will be more partisan. But even in that the country and the world was overwhelmingly behind Bush. Again, contrast that with the GOP electorate AND politicians attempting to criticize Obama for the Xmas day attempt.

But frankly, C4TB you have responded on point and quite reasonably. I don't have anything else to add other than bravo for that.:hatsoff:

Again, in spite of the perception....I don't agree or disagree with people. I agree or disagree with opinions and actions. There is a difference.:2 cents: