Sandra Shine or $3000

Sandra or 3000$


  • Total voters
    123
would you rather have Sandra Shine for 1 Night or $3000 dollars?

if this thread goes good ill do some more lol.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 458
If she, for some reason, genuinely desired me as much as I (superficially anyway) desired her; her.

Otherwise, which would obviously be the reality; the cash.

Though if she is charging $3000 per night as an ****** then I believe she is short changing herself.
But I am no expert.
 
Well then.

I am not trying to be difficult as I think it's a perfectly fine question you pose.

But I actually think I would say no.

If I was spending money like I did a few years ago? Yes.

But now. No.

But if I was worth $10 million dollars? Probably yes.

It's all relative.

Great picture of her though.
 
Its a tricky one for me, because $3000 bucks is £1500, alot of money but not a life changing amount and in the course of time i'd probably forget what i spent it on however If she was really into it then I'm sure a night with her would be very memorable indeed and well worth it.:)

I wouldn't give her that amount of money though to 'buy her wares' for the night .
 
I would take the money. Simply because I have a thing that I will never pay for sex or pay to have chick ****** me anywhere. Plus, I would not want to pay 3000 dollars to be with a girl who has been with TONS of other guys and possibly be paying for myself to get a disease.
Disclaimer: I am not saying she has any diseases. I am simply saying the chances are most likely better.
 
This is an easy one, I'd take the $3000

$3000 is worth way more than a one night stand. I could probably buy a lot of one night stands with $3000 if thats what I was wanting to waist the money on.
 
I would take the money. Simply because I have a thing that I will never pay for sex or pay to have chick ****** me anywhere. Plus, I would not want to pay 3000 dollars to be with a girl who has been with TONS of other guys and possibly be paying for myself to get a disease.
Disclaimer: I am not saying she has any diseases. I am simply saying the chances are most likely better.

You wouldn't be paying for sex would you if you took the Sandra option, you simply just wouldn't recieve the money.

You can't lose what you never had but only gain.
 
You wouldn't be paying for sex would you if you took the Sandra option, you simply just wouldn't recieve the money.

You can't lose what you never had but only gain.

That's a good way to look at it.

You read like a glass-is-half-full kind of person.

:)
 
Be reasonable...if you didnt have the money to begin with, if it was a gift, that you could have one night of Sandra or the 3k, you'd be a fool to take the money. Sandra, you rock, keep up the good work! :crowdgrin
 
$3000 would be long and gone... Sandra for a night would be quite a fond memory..
 
The question is not a well thought out scenario...someone making $3-$10,000 a week wouldn't mind not getting $3000; a night with Sandra would be indeed a special experience.
I make less than $3000 a month now, unlike my better years in the workplace.
So, if ya gonna ask regular folks if they would give up enough to pay the rent, eat, have utilities, and go anywhere in their vehicle that required fuel, I would have to assume that since most "lives of quiet desperation" involve pain, unresolved desires, and lack of pornstar sex the choice wouldn't be as hard to make as some things (like a High Def Widescreen) we have to choose between; ask me if I would give up $1000 or a night with Sandra, and all I'd need would be enough time to grab my digital camera, and some clean clothes for later! ( Sandra, I'm coming...chill the champagne!):D
 
$3000, no doubt. If I'm that desperate for sex, I can get a more for less with that money anyway. No offense to the lady in question.
 
Back
Top