Rattrap
Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
Oof. Ooooof. Man, don't start pulling a georges on me.
Did you choose who you are attracted to? I sure as hell didn't.
There is a third explanation, which you talk about and ironically also disagrees with your position of choice:
SO, please please please don't be the type who looks at evidence that directly contradicts their position, ignores it, and continues with their position anyway. That's where this candid discussion ends.
What you think doesn't fit the evidence. This is something I take issue with. When you have a position, but the evidence all points to another one, we call that being wrong.I don't believe 'gay' is a medical anomaly. I think it is a choice...
Absolute bullshit. There's plenty of demand for that evidence, specifically because the conservative right want to blame gays for being gay. If it's a choice, they can do that. If it's not, that's kind of like discriminating one for one's color, isn't it? And again, the evidence shows that homosexuality is natural - scientists are finding genetic consistencies and that many other animals (for we are animals) display homosexuality as well. Do the gay penguins 'choose' to be gay? Gay birds?There is no demand for scientific evidence that being gay is a choice, because then it eliminates excuses. 'It's not my fault' and 'I was born this way' is easier to deal with than 'This is my taste and preference' or 'This is how I choose to live'. It's really nothing more than experience in taste and taste in experience, IMO.
Did you choose who you are attracted to? I sure as hell didn't.
There is a third explanation, which you talk about and ironically also disagrees with your position of choice:
Environmental conditioning. Which just means instead of genetics picking something for you, your environment does instead (think about how beauty has changed in, say, a couple hundred years). With that in mind one could argue that my environment did condition me to be attracted to a certain body-shape - in my case, the standard pornstar. But at no point in my life did I think to myself, 'You know, I'm going to be attracted to that kind of girl now. POW!' If I could, I'd pick less-than-attractive girls and get laid a lot more than I do. Or hell, even one better, I'd pick men and get laid all the time. I'm all for personal responsibility, mind, and I'm glad to see you are to. The definition of responsibility is the ability to respond - the ability to choose. There are a great many things about ourselves we simply do not have that ability with.Even babies make similar decisions. If you begin by feeding a baby strained carrots, that baby will eat it. Then, switch to applesauce. That baby is going to have either a distinct reaction to show preference to either the applesauce or the carrots. I think its the same choice you make to determine your sexual lifestyle. It's not until you have some kind of experience with one or the other that your preference developed.
SO, please please please don't be the type who looks at evidence that directly contradicts their position, ignores it, and continues with their position anyway. That's where this candid discussion ends.