LMOA! You really are dense. FYI the production date is the 1st thing I noticed, but that has
nothing to do with anything I said. You rudely posted w/o even understanding the point I was making in the 1st place.
The point is: All her scenes with Bangbros have condoms now. Scenes with Brazzers don't. So she didn't have to use condoms with BB in the 1st place since Brazzers proves that she's obviously flexible on this issue. It doesn't matter what the production date is. She did scenes with Brazzers years ago (with production dates years BEFORE that last BB scene) and all with NO condoms and now more Brazzers scenes AFTER that production date - once again w/o condoms. So the "X-factor" is Bangbros. You act as if the fact that she was under contract to BB means there was now some unbreakable Cosmic Law that stated that Rachel Starr must absolutely use condoms. Hell, plenty of contract girls don't use condoms. So either BB chose to (when they obviously didn't have to) make Rachel use condoms
OR (& this is a scarier thought) there's something about BB & the male talent they use that Rachel didn't trust enough to wanna risk going bareback with them. So either way, whether or not Condoms were in the contract, its Bangbros' ineptitude that caused this. The kicker is that all those guys were later doing bareback scenes with other girls in other scenes. So its not like BB has strict condom-only safety issues.
So you bringing up the production date is not only hilarious, but completely misses the point. Rachel probably has even older scenes than this last one, that BB hasn't even released yet and just like clockwork they'll also be with condoms as well. U see, thats the thing about clocks... They're very predictable. U could even say that you could "set your watch to them" (ha ha). So do you understand the term
clockwork now? But hey, maybe next time, if you use more "head beating" emoticons, you'll actually understand what you're debating before making boneheaded posts. So good luck with that, buddy.
Maybe u missed my previous post to the 1 you replied to (since its basically a continuation). Maybe thats why u got so confused. I wonder if you'd be big enough to admit it tho.
PS - Just so we're clear: I'm simply criticizing Bangbros, NOT Rachel.