quality photography sites, sharp VS. blurred

[Connor244]

hey everyone,

i search for photography of beautiful women topless/ naked, but it seems to be difficult to find this in a sharp quality.

most reviews of photography websites just say "the photos have a high resolution".
on sites like met art, mc-nudes, femjoy, aso. i often found photos in a high resolution but they were blurred, out of focus, cloudy.
that way, in my opinion, a high resolution is useless.
i search for photos in a high resolution that are sharp and in focus, where you can see every detail.

do you know where i can find that kind of photography?
i only found hegre-art.com at the moment.
paysites, free sites, individual photographers - whatever you know, preferential softcore.

thanks for every suggestion.

 

[John_8581]

Here's a few:

Network sites:

Mac & Bumble, Premium Link Upgrade
McNudes, Premium Link Upgrade
MetArt, Premium Link Upgrade
Foxes, Premium Link Upgrade
Teaseum, Premium Link Upgrade
Aluring Vixens, Premium Link Upgrade
Penthouse, Premium Link Upgrade

Part of the Manwin/Brazzers network:

Twistys, Premium Link Upgrade
Playboy, Premium Link Upgrade
Babes, Premium Link Upgrade


Individual photographer sites:

The late J. Stephen Hicks' website, Premium Link Upgrade . The site is now being run by Mark Lit.
Suze Randall and her website, Premium Link Upgrade
Holly Randall and her website, Premium Link Upgrade
Filippo Sano and his website, Premium Link Upgrade
Buzz Aziani and his website, Premium Link Upgrade
Tim Jahns and his two websites, Premium Link Upgrade and Premium Link Upgrade
James David and his website, Premium Link Upgrade
Jules Jordan and his website, Premium Link Upgrade
Sotty JX and his website, Premium Link Upgrade

 

[Jeny Smith]

hey we run politic "no brushed" pics so you can visit my site for it if you are ok about solo models. Semi pro high res
jenysmith.net

 

[Connor244]

@ John_8581: why do you mention Met Art & Mc Nudes? I'm not sure whether you understood what i am talking about... I already referred to the sites in my text. or do you think they offer the quality i described? im a member of mc nudes at the moment, and i still think they don't offer this kind of quality. they offer high resolution pictures, but they are not sharp, they are often blurred/ cloudy. but thx for the suggestions.

@ Jeny Smith: thx, ill take a look a the site.

 

[zipper_666]

I shoot amateur models and high resolution photos. They are not super HUGE pictures, but they are crisp and clear, as well as sized at 1600x1200. However, the thing is ...I shoot very amateur photography that consists of very amateur girls. I do not polish up my photos or edit them in any way, so what you see is pretty much the real deal ....but in good detail, as well as many SUPER CLOSEUP shots. What I have found over the years (been shooting models for over 12 years) is that there is a huge market of consumers out there that really enjoy the amateur photography with REAL amateur girls over the polished up and fake looking model sites. I mean, those sites are awesome for what they do, and many of their models are absolutely beautiful, but in my opinion, they do not look amateur nor do they even look real looking with all of the air brushing performed on the photos. But yeah, as far as my site, it is primarily photo based, but I do have (as of today's date) 74 videos. In terms of the photos, there are 163,000 high resolution pictures and 251 models. However, since I regularly update the site with new models, that number frequently changes. If interested, the site URL is Premium Link Upgrade .

So yeah, there are a lot of great sites out there for you to sign up with, but when I read that you are primarily looking for photography based sites, I wanted to reply to the thread. Hope you find a site that fits your needs and thanks for checking out my post. Here is an example of the type of content that I specialize in shooting. But again, keep in mind, this is amateur photography, but I have always been pleased with the skin tones and the quality overall. I don't know, perhaps you will like the quality ...or perhaps, maybe not so much, but just figured I'd share.


Name: Abby
Age: 18
Height: 5' 04
Employment: Restaurant Waitress
Pictures: 2000 High Resolution Pictures
Videos: 1 High Definition Modeling & Ass Spreading Video

Abby is an 18 year old amateur teen that works at a sub sandwich restaurant. I went inside to purchase a sub sandwich and this sexy teen was the person to take my order! I instantly took the opportunity
to speak with her about my amateur nude modeling website, while she continued to prepare my sandwich. Since business was so slow that night, I was actually able to speak with her for about 30 minutes,
with nobody else even around! She had a lot of questions about the modeling, and was even a little hesitant at first about getting naked on the internet for everyone in the world to see, but as we continued
to speak with each other, this amateur teen finally told me that she would be willing to try the amateur nude modeling! Watch this 18 year old amateur teen strip down and model nude for you!

Click the thumb below to go to the gallery!

Premium Link Upgrade

photo above used from the gallery
Premium Link Upgrade

 

[Jeny Smith]

example galleries:
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade

 

[Connor244]

@zipper_666: what you describe sounds really good. i'll have a look at the site, thank you!

@jeny smith: thx for the examples!

so that's the name for the blurred/ out of focus/ cloudy images - airbrushed/ brushed photos? i don't understand why people like this kind of photo editing. maybe it's kind of art.

if someone has more examples for sharp photography like described*, please post them here.
others like me may search for the same in this forum - then they can read through this thread.

thanks for every suggestion.


*sharp, in focus, not airbrushed, not brushed, unedited

 

[Jeny Smith]

@jeny smith: thx for the examples!

so that's the name for the blurred/ out of focus/ cloudy images - airbrushed/ brushed photos? i don't understand why people like this kind of photo editing. maybe it's kind of art.

yeah it's kind of art. Playboy brought it in the industry i guess. They always had brushed models and even blurred pussy lips. Some people like to see ideal girls pictures, some like it raw , that's your tastes :o)

 

[dpantski]

Just remember some sites like METART have been around a long time so the older pictures will probably have been shot with a camera that's not upto today's standards. Also a site like has many photographers so I doubt they all use the same equipment.

 

[John_8581]

Just remember some sites like METART have been around a long time so the older pictures will probably have been shot with a camera that's not upto today's standards. Also a site like has many photographers so I doubt they all use the same equipment.

:clap: Exactly the point.

@ John_8581: why do you mention [nobabe]Met Art[/nobabe] & [nobabe]Mc Nudes[/nobabe]? I'm not sure whether you understood what i am talking about... I already referred to the sites in my text. or do you think they offer the quality i described? im a member of [nobabe]mc nudes[/nobabe] at the moment, and i still think they don't offer this kind of quality. they offer high resolution pictures, but they are not sharp, they are often blurred/ cloudy. but thx for the suggestions.

Oh I understood what you are talking about. I just decided to give you a complete listing. Take it for what it is worth.

Please pay attention to the work of those individual photographers, i.e., J. Stephen Hicks, Mark Lit, Suze Randall, Holly Randall, Filippo Sano, Buzz Aziani, and Tim Jahns. You surely won't be disappointed.

Now, here's five more photographers to look at. These are photographers that I did not mention in my first post: Rich Cutrone, Andy McFarland, Johnny Crosslin, Anton Fury and Jim Maxwell.

 

[maildude]

If you really want to rip your hair out over this, go check out the old Penthouse photo spreads. Most of them look like the photographers did the shoot in the back of a bar somewhere.:hairpull: