Porn sites with HD Images???

[joesup3rtramp]

I'm looking to get a new membership, but want a site that also has HD imagery to go with their videos. It bothers me that there are still no high res images on some porn sites. Naughty America for example has low res imagery for a lot of there videos even in 2012 which is pretty recent on the technology curve if you ask me. Brazzers does an awesome job of having super high res imagery, even Bangbros that has higher res images than their video...smh. Does anyone know any good sites with super HD images as well as videos?

 

[luis1972]

www.passion-hd.com

 

[zipper_666]

All of the images that I shoot for True Amateur Models are always high resolution images, but consisting of very
amateur models. Many of the models are actually rather good at the modeling too, despite the fact that they have
never modeled before. Here is an example, just to give you an idea. And also. just so you know, True Amateur
Models has a total amount of 143,000 high resolution images in the members area ...and this number is
always climbing higher because the website is always updated regularly with exclusive content that was taken by
myself and added into the members area. So yeah, we are talking about very exclusive and 100% real amateur
stuff here. But again, the models on this website consist of very amateur girls and not professional porn stars.


Name: Amber S.
Age: 21
Employment: Restaurant Hostess
Height: 5' 5
Pictures: 750 High Resolution Pictures
Videos: 1 High Definition Nude Modeling Video

This is a 100% real and very amateur girl that I met at a fast food place the other day and decided to approach her in regards to
speaking with her about my amateur nude modeling shoots ...hoping that she would agree to become one of my models! I really
didn't waste much time with this girl at all, and just went right up to her and started (almost instantly) talking to her about my
modeling shoots! I just absolutely had to see what that tight ass looked like all spread apart with her hands! Oh and I also had
to see that pussy, as I had been wondering how delicious it must look! And boy, was I right about that!

Click the thumb below to go to the gallery!



photo above used from the gallery - http://www.trueamateurmodels.com/big-breasted-amateur.html

 

[Aaliyah Love]

AaliyahLove.com

 

[EggMcMoofin]

I'm looking to get a new membership, but want a site that also has HD imagery to go with their videos. It bothers me that there are still no high res images on some porn sites. Naughty America for example has low res imagery for a lot of there videos even in 2012 which is pretty recent on the technology curve if you ask me. Brazzers does an awesome job of having super high res imagery, even Bangbros that has higher res images than their video...smh. Does anyone know any good sites with super HD images as well as videos?

Most sites won't bother with high-res images and some of the ones that do have them - like Brazzers - have them overly compressed or at 1/3-1/4th the original resolution. PornPros, InTheCrack, Twistys, Creampie, Joymii and a few others have had high-res images for a long time but the quality is all over the place. 4K/5K monitors will be the standard in the next few years, so a lot of sites are way behind in their photo and video content. At minimum, they should be offering 20 megapixel images but it looks like many of them are still using older Nikon kits from 2009 or they use point and shoot cameras with low-resolution and bad lenses.

 

[johnnerd]

www.passion-hd.com

thanks... really nice.

 

[Patrick_S]

Most sites won't bother with high-res images and some of the ones that do have them - like Brazzers - have them overly compressed or at 1/3-1/4th the original resolution.

They also can´t be bothered to pick out the best 100 or so photos in a photoshoot. In stead they simply dump every photo taken in the shoot in a zip file, and you end up with having to download a 1GB file where half of the photos are almost identical, and some are even out of focus. Porn is seems, is all about quantity over quality.

 

[zipper_666]

They also can´t be bothered to pick out the best 100 or so photos in a photoshoot. In stead they simply dump every photo taken in the shoot in a zip file, and you end up with having to download a 1GB file where half of the photos are almost identical, and some are even out of focus. Porn is seems, is all about quantity over quality.

As a membership pay site owner and content producer, I actually agree with you on this 100%. I always go though my photos after I do a shoot and choose the best looking photos. I mean, I do have pictures that resemble some of the others, but the reason why is so that the viewer can see the same position of the model, but from several different angles. That's just my particular style of shooting. But yeah, zip files are convenient, but they can also be a pain in the ass, because as you say, the viewer ends up getting an entire folder of pictures, where many of them were not even desired to be saved ...but came along with the mass download.

I also agree with EggMcMoofin. Monitors are constantly changing and are getting much larger, but as far as my photos, I have the original photos on my server, and can at anytime convert them over to be MUCH larger, but instead I choose to leave them at reasonable sizes. I remember back in the day, joining a few pay sites (way before I even stated shooting content) - I always hated when when the pictures were SIZED SO HUGE. I would have to scroll over half my screen just to view the entire picture. So yeah, for the time being, I have my pictures sized at 1600x1200. I know that isn't huge, but when you click them on a standard monitor, they fill up the screen just enough so that you do not have to scroll all the way over ...which I think is a pain in the ass for the surfer.

But again, I very well may end up sizing my photos even larger, but just have not done so quite yet.

 

[FreeOnes_Adam]

I admit, I am a snob for HD images on paysites. If they don't zoom the hell in, I am always disappointed.

I like details, I really do.

 

[Patrick_S]

As a membership pay site owner and content producer, I actually agree with you on this 100%. I always go though my photos after I do a shoot and choose the best looking photos. I mean, I do have pictures that resemble some of the others, but the reason why is so that the viewer can see the same position of the model, but from several different angles. That's just my particular style of shooting. But yeah, zip files are convenient, but they can also be a pain in the ass, because as you say, the viewer ends up getting an entire folder of pictures, where many of them were not even desired to be saved ...but came along with the mass download.

I also agree with EggMcMoofin. Monitors are constantly changing and are getting much larger, but as far as my photos, I have the original photos on my server, and can at anytime convert them over to be MUCH larger, but instead I choose to leave them at reasonable sizes. I remember back in the day, joining a few pay sites (way before I even stated shooting content) - I always hated when when the pictures were SIZED SO HUGE. I would have to scroll over half my screen just to view the entire picture. So yeah, for the time being, I have my pictures sized at 1600x1200. I know that isn't huge, but when you click them on a standard monitor, they fill up the screen just enough so that you do not have to scroll all the way over ...which I think is a pain in the ass for the surfer.

But again, I very well may end up sizing my photos even larger, but just have not done so quite yet.

You can use coding to make the images fit the screen. On my site i use a jquery thingy called colorbox to do that (it´s similar to lightbox, but with colorbox you can right-click and save images).

 

[EggMcMoofin]

I plan on buying a 5K display in the next 2-3 years for my photo work and 4K will become the standard display resolution in 2016, so I'm definitely looking forward to high-res photos. The key to great images is high-resolution, proper compression, and minimal noise reduction/sharpening. A high-resolution JPEG file - created by camera or by photo editing program from a RAW file - always has a lot of junk encoded int it and it's always better to strip out the junk data and optimize the encoding than it is to simply jack up the compression and lose visual quality, which is how 99.95% of the photo editing programs work. There are several JPEG optimization programs/plug-ins that you can incorporate into your workflow to get big images without the big file sizes. I use Linux, so I use JPEGOPTIM, which is free and cross-platform but rather difficult to use and hit or miss for optimization due to it being a command-line program. However, many of the site/content folks usually use Mac or Windows, so you have to go with a solution that is easier to integrate into your workflow. The best solution for commercial useon Windows/Mac is JPEGmini, which is used by quite a few companies to optimize their images for mobile and web services, and it definitely gets the job done with a significant drop in file size.

 

[himperv203]

interesting question.... most porn sites have HD images even freeones does.

http://my.freeones.com/cgi-bin/galleriesbrowse.pl

 

[joesup3rtramp]

Wow. These porn sites should really invest in better quality photos. I can deal with downloading the whole set of the shoot but seriously wish sites would address this. There are fans of the photo shoots, most shoots have some really good images.

 

[Anonyne#017]

High resolution starts to return diminished values for eyes to perceive after certain points on depending on screen size and view distance etc anyway. Unless you are watching porn on a movie theatre sized canvas in your home...

How close into the pussy pictures do you guys really want to zoom in actually? :doa82:

 

[ClubSweethearts]

www.elegantraw.com 4k