Polanski

The Pianist is an amazing film.

I think there's so much "strangeness" with this case that I honestly don't know what to do. The Victim received a settlement from Polanski. She's moved on with her life and doesn't want to be back in the spotlight. I'm sensitive to her needs/desires over Polanksi's.

Is this a case where it's an old guy who would probably die in prison because he's not going to get 30 years, but he'll get 10-15? Is that what society wants in this case?

Since he has no history of this behavior other than 1 heinous act...I tend to think I'd prefer to use him and his money to the benefit of our society. Why can't we confiscate most of his fortune and put it to use? Isn't that better than putting him in a cell, at this point...?
 

tartanterrier

Is somewhere outhere.
Like all the other paedos that lurk within our society.They should be
exterminated.

I mean they get less punishment,to what they gave to Jesus Christ :dunno:

If I was President.I'd give them all the injection ;)
 
If he were Jimmy-bob Polanski, a street cleaner from nowhereville, you can be damn sure that he would get his comeuppance and nobody would say a word..

So I see no problem with this, whatsoever..
he did something very wrong and he's going to get HIS comeuppance.:2 cents:
 
I think that marines should open guantanamo again to put him there and throw him a couple of punches. If I would meet him I would definetely punch him right in face. Don't get me wrong I am not a violent person but when somebody pick on someone who is weaker than him then I get really violent. :mad:
 
The Pianist is an amazing film.



Since he has no history of this behavior other than 1 heinous act...I tend to think I'd prefer to use him and his money to the benefit of our society. Why can't we confiscate most of his fortune and put it to use? Isn't that better than putting him in a cell, at this point...?

This is lifted from reason magazine.



I've got a copy of RoPo's memoir, Roman by Polanski (get it???), sitting on my desk. Would you like to see an excerpt involving the sexing up of girls not of driver's permit age? Too late! This section describes events from October 1976:

One day a German gossip columnist invited me out on a double date with two girls he wante me to meet. Both were young and, in different ways, strikingly beautiful. One of them was rather dowdily dressed. I asked her name. "My friends call me Nasty," she said. [...] Very late that night, after a long round of discos, the four of us ended up in my suite. Leaving Nasty with the journalist, I took the other girl, a stunning blonde, to bed. By the time I surfaced the journalist had gone. Nasty was half-asleep in an armchair in the sitting room. Taking her by the hand, I led her back into the bedroom.

We never repeated this threesome, though I saw a lotof both girls thereafter. I dated the blonde for several weeks, but it was Nasty who grew on me more and more. [...]

Nastassia introdued me to her mother, who discussed her career with me [...]. That was when I first learned Nastassia's age. She was only fifteen.

We made love more than once during my three months in Munich. [...] On the night we met I'd thought her a couple of years older than her friend, who was, in fact, seventeen.

Charming! Just a couple of months later came The Incident. Yes, he describes it in the book. I'll keep the nauseating excerpt to a minimum:

Then, very gently, I began to kiss and caress her. After this had gone on for some time, I led her over to the couch.

There was no doubt about Sandra's experience and lack of inhibition. She spread herself and I entered her. She wasn't unresponsive.

Polanski was "incredulous" that anyone would consider his actions a crime. And he was indignant that photographs of him yukking it up in Munich on leave from his case became an issue, since the females in the photo were attached to various friends. Of course, at the time, he was still shacking up with Kinski, though in fairness she was a wisened old lady of 16.



And I just couldn't get over the fucking arrogance of this..........................




Today, Martin Scorsese and David Lynch also added their names to those of sixty-odd other cinematic luminaries who've signed a petition calling for Polanski's immediate release. But the award for complete lack of self-awareness has to go to another new signee who placed his moral capital in such matters on the table today as well: Woody Allen.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Ok, Having sex with a 13 year old virgin is depraved enough, but drugging her and sodomizing her is just disgusting.
Funny how these clowns aren't asking for leniency, but a complete pardon.
 

Lust

Lost at Birth
The Pianist is an amazing film.

I think there's so much "strangeness" with this case that I honestly don't know what to do. The Victim received a settlement from Polanski. She's moved on with her life and doesn't want to be back in the spotlight. I'm sensitive to her needs/desires over Polanksi's.

Is this a case where it's an old guy who would probably die in prison because he's not going to get 30 years, but he'll get 10-15? Is that what society wants in this case?

Since he has no history of this behavior other than 1 heinous act...I tend to think I'd prefer to use him and his money to the benefit of our society. Why can't we confiscate most of his fortune and put it to use? Isn't that better than putting him in a cell, at this point...?

i think you're very correct TR, there is "strangeness" to this case....

a child was raped. her testimony, if you havnt read it, is digustingly, disturbingly brutal. she said no repeatedly, she asked to leave repeatedly, he disregarded her wishes repeatedly and penetrated her vagina and anus after he had given her booze and qualude......

when being presented with several different counts of prosecution he pleaded to having sex with a minor, this doesnt mean he was innocent, it means he admits to the fact....the fact that sex occured has never been a question. was it consesual? no, because a 13 year old can not legally consent to having sex...thats the law back then and and it still is now before any rape apologist, get any ideas.

but the thing is her testimony completely disputes consent and if you read it, and listen to her words as a small 13 year old child when she talks about how he rapes her in the vagina and she refers to it as "cuddles", my god its fucking sick, i just can't fucking fathom having to be the one who has to listen to her testimony. cuddles...thats what an innocent will call it when a fucking sick fuck rapes her......how fucking sad. if that alone doesnt make you want to fucking burn every fucking rapist out there then well....fuck it, you're a weak individual and worthless towards protecting the daughters of the world.

because its 30 years later do we just forget? what about nazi war criminals that were discovered back in the 80's, should we think back then, "oh hey guys its been a while we should just let them go? I'm sure they've proven themselves ok by not performing any more wars and war crimes since then."

so.....let me spell it out for you plain and simple.....a thirteen year old girl was drugged by a mid 40's man, he performed oral sex on her to which she told him stop. he penetrated her vagina with his penis to which she told him to stop. he pentrated her anus with his penis to which she told him to stop. she hid in the bathroom after one of the incidents to which he came in, got her naked again...etc.... she asked to go home, he said not yet. she said no, he disregarded. A child was raped....say that over and over to yourself Titsrock...a child was raped. a child was raped. a child was raped.

Here's the strangeness to the this case in case you havent identified what the strangeness is.....people, are still defending polanski. A CHILD WAS RAPED! yes, for the love of everything humanity has to offer us hunt him down, bring him to justice and make him face the consequences. do this to every rapist out there god damnit!

if it was roman the janitor, no one would have defended him, a plea bargain wouldnt have been on the table and hopefully roman the janitor would still be in jail. but since the guy made some decent movies well lets just let him off a bit shall we? i mean he's suffered living a life of luxury in france....a gilded exile, if you will.

taking his money and paying for stuff does not cut it, if thats the case then any rich person is above the law because he essentially has the ability to BUY his way out of prosectution....which is just another step towards the end of civilization as we know it. i'm pretty wealthy but i don't want that option and instead I choose to not behave as a cretin.

do i speak this passionate about bringing to justice every rapist out there....yes, yes i do...someone close to me was raped as a teen and after seeing the terrible destruction it made on their life and still to this day how if effects their decisions, then yes i most whole heartedly donate, volunteer and pursue with every fiber of my being to bring to justice every single perverted sick sleazy slimeball rapist that does this...including roman polanski, regardless of any film he has ever made or will ever make.

the strangeness is.....why wouldnt you do the same? i see you as one thats completely for justice and defending the helpless and reading your previous posts that show a moral backbone, I can't help but be confused why you would NOT be outraged. A child was raped, TR. mr polanski raped that child. 30 years passing means nothing......a child was raped.
 
the strangeness is.....why wouldnt you do the same? i see you as one thats completely for justice and defending the helpless and reading your previous posts that show a moral backbone, I can't help but be confused why you would NOT be outraged. A child was raped, TR. mr polanski raped that child. 30 years passing means nothing......a child was raped.

The strangeness in this case is that Polanski's wife was murdered by Charles Manson's psycho followers. He committed his crime some time afterward, but it's hard not to see some sort of mental fuckup connection. I'm not saying this case should be dropped. All I'm saying is how can we, as a society, gain from this? Simply tossing Polanski in a cell to rot is one solution, but so is taking all his money, and using it for some greater purpose. Have Polanski serve some time, but take away his money, livelyhood. It would be more comforting if Polanski was a repeat offender or if there were "rumors" of continued underage shenanigans in France or wherever. Then I'd have no problem tossing him in the slam. :dunno:
 

Lust

Lost at Birth
The strangeness in this case is that Polanski's wife was murdered by Charles Manson's psycho followers. He committed his crime some time afterward, but it's hard not to see some sort of mental fuckup connection. I'm not saying this case should be dropped. All I'm saying is how can we, as a society, gain from this? Simply tossing Polanski in a cell to rot is one solution, but so is taking all his money, and using it for some greater purpose. Have Polanski serve some time, but take away his money, livelyhood. It would be more comforting if Polanski was a repeat offender or if there were "rumors" of continued underage shenanigans in France or wherever. Then I'd have no problem tossing him in the slam. :dunno:

you're correct, there could definitely be a mental fuck up fromt he manson shit that happened and trust me, i'm pretty adamant about those fucks remaining locked away. but that was one of the basis for the psych evaluation. in a nutshell, the plea was a 90 day psych eval and then go free. now, im not really fond of that deal but there were so many reasons for it. one being the manson connection, but that was minimal. another being the clout of hollywood and backroom pressure.

another reason and this being the real "gotcha" against the courts, was the pressure on the victim and her family. the hollywood types love to point out how Polanski was being villanized by the mainstream papers but what they fail to reveal is that the little girl was being done the same. she was being labled a lolita, a temptress, a little devil...these were actual names being thrown on the 13 year old girl by other members of the press. her mother was being labled a pimp who threw her daughter upon polanski and even some of the little girls friends were no longer allowed to play with her because she was raped

the courts seeing these circumstances went with plea bargain....roman actually got off really easy, its just well, he couldnt seem to stay away from those young girls even when on trial....he was photographed with two young teens, the judge saw the pic and hit the roof....roman found out and ran away.

the trial was pretty much over....we were at the sentencing part...and had the judge reneged on the agreed bargain then the next appeallate court most assuredly would have seen the misconduct and over turn....these are california courts after all. i live in CA, my GF is in law, CA courts dont fuck around when shennanigans are displayed by the lower courts. but roman ran. the little girl stayed though she was being labled the teen age jezebel, she had no luxury of running. even after the crime she was being victimized, her assailant was now on the lam and the media was still depicting her a harlot.

during this time Roman has shown no remorse, in fact, he's been quoted as saying that it wasnt like it was murder, it was fucking a young girl, and everyone likes fucking a young girl...judges, juries, everyone. <<<<< i'm fucking not kidding here, he really said this.

some of his memoirs have shown explicit reading into that fact. heck, jolly even posted something about that in a few posts above. roman has shown no sorrow, no guilt and has painted himself as a victim after he stole the innoncence of a 13 year old girl.

during this time he has snubbed his nose at the justice system by hiding in luxurious exile. he's had his celebrity peers praise him, reward him, defend him.... and and as recently as a couple of years ago he was told, hey there's a new judge, she see's that the previous judge would have potentially broke his word, she see's indescretions on the courts part...come on back, lets iron it out...most likely you'll be set free for "time served". now this is a fucking amazing offer and what does Roman do? he snubs his nose yet again at one of the most compelling compassionate offers ever made by a court to a convicted rapist on the lam.

he mocks the system of law and judicial process from afar and lets his high society friends defend him locally. its a mockery of justice. its a case of the privileged being privileged. and its a case of trampling upon the very basis of a legal effort we as human beings try to live by and ensure some sort of equality amongst each other. he laughs at that from the ivory tower in europe and continues to paint himself and let others paint him as the victim.

if roman would at least put forth some sort of effort to show remorse, to show he's interested in justice being served instead of cowardly sniveling as to how he's the victim and letting his rich and powerful friends do the fighting for him.....well, maybe i'd be a bit more leanient.....but he hasnt so I wont.

hell in a civil suite he agreed to pay the vicitim 500 grand. two years later she had to sue cos he had not paid one penny of that. as far as i've heard he still hasnt. the man has absolutley NO respect for courts, law or justice....he's shown no hint of morality whatsoever. he has proven however, to be an arrogant, narcistic prick who raped the innocence out of child and thinks he's pretty much not having to own up to anything. in fact, the closest he's come to saying anything remorseful is thus (verbatim) "I've been tortured by this for a year and that's enough" this is an odd defintion of torture....makes you wonder what he thinks raping a 13 year old girl is.


what can society gain? i dont know, to be honest. but i do think its time for this mr polanski to stop gaining anything else from it, because he has gained more from it than anyone else walking this planet oddly enough. i dont even know what the verdict would be...i think if he showed honest regret over the whole thing he'd find a bit of mercy from the courts, more mercy than he deserves. but he has to be brought to justice...every convicted criminal should be. regardless of time passed because i for one, think justice, equality and truth never go out of style.

it sucks cos i'm a very liberal person, im rather ultra liberal and usually idenitify with you and mega and a few others on this website on most free ones debates. but it just seems as a liberal i stand with a small crowd on this particualr case. however, i stand in very good company...my GF who's an activist lawyer her in SF and i respect very much, Eugene Robinson, Katha Pollit two of the most left leaning and respected political columnist in our camp and even freakin Kevin Smith (Clerks director). I'm rather proud to be with this company and I like Kevin's movies much more than Polanskis...yeah i'm juvenile and a bit immature culturally but thats another story entirely.....

Society gains nothing from a crime, even when the criminal is convicted, we have still been victimized. But that doesnt mean the criminal should be allowed to gain either. Punish him, he admitted to the crime and has laughed at us from a distance ever since at us and our apparently naive belief that justice is worth fighting for.

sorry so long on the response TR, but honestly a couple of years ago i knew nothing about this case and it was my GF who enlightened me, all when the Pianist was up for an oscar. Since then my disgust for mr polanski cant even be measured. but again, i'm like this with every convicted rapist. perhaps its a flaw on my part, but i hope not. thanks for reading.
 
I'm just as disgusted with the Hollywood "big shots" who are demanding he go free. The man had sex with a CHILD! How the fuck can they defend this???:mad:
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
The strangeness in this case is that Polanski's wife was murdered by Charles Manson's psycho followers. He committed his crime some time afterward, but it's hard not to see some sort of mental fuckup connection. I'm not saying this case should be dropped. All I'm saying is how can we, as a society, gain from this? Simply tossing Polanski in a cell to rot is one solution, but so is taking all his money, and using it for some greater purpose. Have Polanski serve some time, but take away his money, livelyhood. It would be more comforting if Polanski was a repeat offender or if there were "rumors" of continued underage shenanigans in France or wherever. Then I'd have no problem tossing him in the slam. :dunno:

maybe we could just tack on 30 years to mansons sentance.

take his money? give it to THE GOV ?
sorry, cant buy your way out of jail, (exception: bill clinton 2000/01 when he was selling pardons and making millions)
hey maybe he could wait until 2012 and by one from barry o on his way out.

tits, he drugged a kid and fucked her in the ass, gotta pay the piper.

I got an idea " roman , sir, pedefile sir, 30 years in jail or we cut off your dick, which will it be?".
 
The motherfucker is a child rapist! Enough said! He had thirty years more than he should have had in terms of freedom. Chop his cock off and land him in prison so the inmates can make him feel like that 13 year old felt.
 
Yes, he did something stupid in Jack Nicholson's house with Angelica Huston apparently asleep in the next room?

He should do time, but our Gov should go after his money. He will lose his rights once he walks into that jail cell. He has a lot of money that we could somehow use for society's benefit in regards to protecting kids from abuse or hell--use the money to root out more pedos....
 
Top